{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Advise &amp; Consult, Inc.","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog","author_name":"admin","author_url":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/author\/admin\/","title":"Analysis of \u201cOccurrence\u201d in Defect Coverage Actions - Advise &amp; Consult, Inc.","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"Tv9Y7FEEVU\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/analysis-of-occurrence-in-defect-coverage-actions\/\">Analysis of \u201cOccurrence\u201d in Defect Coverage Actions<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/analysis-of-occurrence-in-defect-coverage-actions\/embed\/#?secret=Tv9Y7FEEVU\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"&#8220;Analysis of \u201cOccurrence\u201d in Defect Coverage Actions&#8221; &#8212; Advise &amp; Consult, Inc.\" data-secret=\"Tv9Y7FEEVU\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"Aaron Mandel and Stevi Raab &#8211; February 8, 2013 Through its recent opinion in Westfield Ins. Co. v. Custom Agri Systems, Inc., 2012 WL 4944305 (Ohio Oct. 16, 2012) (\u201cWestfield\u201d), the Ohio Supreme Court joined the majority of states in holding that faulty construction work does not qualify as an \u201coccurrence\u201d within the meaning of&hellip; Continue reading Untitled"}