{"id":1203,"date":"2013-01-16T08:18:54","date_gmt":"2013-01-16T15:18:54","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/?p=1203"},"modified":"2013-01-16T08:21:16","modified_gmt":"2013-01-16T15:21:16","slug":"december-2012-bad-faith-cases-court-grants-insureds-motion-to-amend-complaint-with-bad-faith-count-but-grants-partial-protective-order-to-carrier-shielding-it-from-discovery-on-related-bad","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/december-2012-bad-faith-cases-court-grants-insureds-motion-to-amend-complaint-with-bad-faith-count-but-grants-partial-protective-order-to-carrier-shielding-it-from-discovery-on-related-bad\/","title":{"rendered":"DECEMBER 2012 BAD FAITH CASES: COURT GRANTS INSURED\u2019S MOTION TO AMEND COMPLAINT WITH BAD FAITH COUNT, BUT GRANTS PARTIAL PROTECTIVE ORDER TO CARRIER, SHIELDING IT FROM DISCOVERY ON RELATED BAD FAITH CLAIMS"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>December 29, 2012<\/p>\n<p>In Raritan Bay Fed. Credit Union v. CUMIS Ins. Soc\u2019y, Inc., the insured sought discovery and to amend its complaint after its bad faith claims were initially dismissed without prejudice in 2009. (See this case). The carrier objected on several grounds, seeking to: (1) preclude the insured from conducting discovery on the sales and marketing of the bond it purchased, along with \u201cbest practices\u201d advice offered by the carrier to its customers; (2) preclude depositions of present and former employees of the carrier; (3) limit depositions and quash subpoenas seeking information from the carrier\u2019s investigator.<\/p>\n<p>First, the court found that the insured should be entitled to amend its complaint with respect to claims that the carrier engaged in a sham investigation after deciding to deny coverage, for the sole purpose of obtaining information against the insured for future litigation. The court also permitted the insured to amend its complaint with a claim that the carrier failed, in bad faith, to advise the insured as to the basis for its denial. However, the court found that the carrier did not act in bad faith by citing vagueness in the insured\u2019s loan policies as a reason to deny coverage.<\/p>\n<p>Second, the court refused to permit discovery on the carrier\u2019s marketing of its bonds and its \u201cbest practices\u201d advice because this information was outside the scope of the insured\u2019s amended claims. The court also denied the insured\u2019s request to depose the carrier\u2019s present and former employees, as well as the subpoenas sought by the insured. The court did permit the insured to seek information relating to the carrier\u2019s investigators, finding that such information was not privileged or attorney work product.<\/p>\n<p>via <a href=\"http:\/\/www.pabadfaithlaw.com\/index.php\/december-2012-bad-faith-cases-court-grants-insureds-motion-to-amend-complaint-with-bad-faith-count-but-grants-partial-protective-order-to-carrier-shielding-it-from-discovery-on-related-bad\/\">DECEMBER 2012 BAD FAITH CASES: COURT GRANTS INSURED\u2019S MOTION TO AMEND COMPLAINT WITH BAD FAITH COUNT, BUT GRANTS PARTIAL PROTECTIVE ORDER TO CARRIER, SHIELDING IT FROM DISCOVERY ON RELATED BAD FAITH CLAIMS (New Jersey Federal) \u00ab PENNSYLVANIA AND NEW JERSEY INSURANCE BAD FAITH CASE LAW BLOG<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>December 29, 2012 In Raritan Bay Fed. Credit Union v. CUMIS Ins. Soc\u2019y, Inc., the insured sought discovery and to amend its complaint after its bad faith claims were initially dismissed without prejudice in 2009. (See this case). The carrier objected on several grounds, seeking to: (1) preclude the insured from conducting discovery on the&hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/december-2012-bad-faith-cases-court-grants-insureds-motion-to-amend-complaint-with-bad-faith-count-but-grants-partial-protective-order-to-carrier-shielding-it-from-discovery-on-related-bad\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">DECEMBER 2012 BAD FAITH CASES: COURT GRANTS INSURED\u2019S MOTION TO AMEND COMPLAINT WITH BAD FAITH COUNT, BUT GRANTS PARTIAL PROTECTIVE ORDER TO CARRIER, SHIELDING IT FROM DISCOVERY ON RELATED BAD FAITH CLAIMS<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[3],"tags":[257],"class_list":["post-1203","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-insurance-claims","tag-bad-faith-insurance-claim","entry"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v25.0 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>DECEMBER 2012 BAD FAITH CASES: COURT GRANTS INSURED\u2019S MOTION TO AMEND COMPLAINT WITH BAD FAITH COUNT, BUT GRANTS PARTIAL PROTECTIVE ORDER TO CARRIER, SHIELDING IT FROM DISCOVERY ON RELATED BAD FAITH CLAIMS - Advise &amp; Consult, Inc.<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/december-2012-bad-faith-cases-court-grants-insureds-motion-to-amend-complaint-with-bad-faith-count-but-grants-partial-protective-order-to-carrier-shielding-it-from-discovery-on-related-bad\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"DECEMBER 2012 BAD FAITH CASES: COURT GRANTS INSURED\u2019S MOTION TO AMEND COMPLAINT WITH BAD FAITH COUNT, BUT GRANTS PARTIAL PROTECTIVE ORDER TO CARRIER, SHIELDING IT FROM DISCOVERY ON RELATED BAD FAITH CLAIMS - Advise &amp; Consult, Inc.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"December 29, 2012 In Raritan Bay Fed. Credit Union v. CUMIS Ins. Soc\u2019y, Inc., the insured sought discovery and to amend its complaint after its bad faith claims were initially dismissed without prejudice in 2009. (See this case). The carrier objected on several grounds, seeking to: (1) preclude the insured from conducting discovery on the&hellip; Continue reading DECEMBER 2012 BAD FAITH CASES: COURT GRANTS INSURED\u2019S MOTION TO AMEND COMPLAINT WITH BAD FAITH COUNT, BUT GRANTS PARTIAL PROTECTIVE ORDER TO CARRIER, SHIELDING IT FROM DISCOVERY ON RELATED BAD FAITH CLAIMS\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/december-2012-bad-faith-cases-court-grants-insureds-motion-to-amend-complaint-with-bad-faith-count-but-grants-partial-protective-order-to-carrier-shielding-it-from-discovery-on-related-bad\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Advise &amp; Consult, Inc.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Advise-Consult-Inc-126949043996790\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2013-01-16T15:18:54+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2013-01-16T15:21:16+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@adviseconsult\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@adviseconsult\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/december-2012-bad-faith-cases-court-grants-insureds-motion-to-amend-complaint-with-bad-faith-count-but-grants-partial-protective-order-to-carrier-shielding-it-from-discovery-on-related-bad\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/december-2012-bad-faith-cases-court-grants-insureds-motion-to-amend-complaint-with-bad-faith-count-but-grants-partial-protective-order-to-carrier-shielding-it-from-discovery-on-related-bad\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/0a11abe008083d5fb19c2b0feefe7bd7\"},\"headline\":\"DECEMBER 2012 BAD FAITH CASES: COURT GRANTS INSURED\u2019S MOTION TO AMEND COMPLAINT WITH BAD FAITH COUNT, BUT GRANTS PARTIAL PROTECTIVE ORDER TO CARRIER, SHIELDING IT FROM DISCOVERY ON RELATED BAD FAITH CLAIMS\",\"datePublished\":\"2013-01-16T15:18:54+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2013-01-16T15:21:16+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/december-2012-bad-faith-cases-court-grants-insureds-motion-to-amend-complaint-with-bad-faith-count-but-grants-partial-protective-order-to-carrier-shielding-it-from-discovery-on-related-bad\/\"},\"wordCount\":360,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#organization\"},\"keywords\":[\"Bad Faith Insurance Claim\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Insurance Claims\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/december-2012-bad-faith-cases-court-grants-insureds-motion-to-amend-complaint-with-bad-faith-count-but-grants-partial-protective-order-to-carrier-shielding-it-from-discovery-on-related-bad\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/december-2012-bad-faith-cases-court-grants-insureds-motion-to-amend-complaint-with-bad-faith-count-but-grants-partial-protective-order-to-carrier-shielding-it-from-discovery-on-related-bad\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/december-2012-bad-faith-cases-court-grants-insureds-motion-to-amend-complaint-with-bad-faith-count-but-grants-partial-protective-order-to-carrier-shielding-it-from-discovery-on-related-bad\/\",\"name\":\"DECEMBER 2012 BAD FAITH CASES: COURT GRANTS INSURED\u2019S MOTION TO AMEND COMPLAINT WITH BAD FAITH COUNT, BUT GRANTS PARTIAL PROTECTIVE ORDER TO CARRIER, SHIELDING IT FROM DISCOVERY ON RELATED BAD FAITH CLAIMS - Advise &amp; Consult, Inc.\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2013-01-16T15:18:54+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2013-01-16T15:21:16+00:00\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/december-2012-bad-faith-cases-court-grants-insureds-motion-to-amend-complaint-with-bad-faith-count-but-grants-partial-protective-order-to-carrier-shielding-it-from-discovery-on-related-bad\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"Advise &amp; Consult, Inc.\",\"description\":\"Construction Expert Witnesses\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Advise & Consult\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/AC-Red-Logo.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/AC-Red-Logo.png\",\"width\":162,\"height\":75,\"caption\":\"Advise & Consult\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Advise-Consult-Inc-126949043996790\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/adviseconsult\",\"https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company-beta\/204526\/\",\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/user\/MrConstructionExpert\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/0a11abe008083d5fb19c2b0feefe7bd7\",\"name\":\"admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/b01e71b7acadd7657af782b7ad1a30cc?s=96&d=mm&r=pg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/b01e71b7acadd7657af782b7ad1a30cc?s=96&d=mm&r=pg\",\"caption\":\"admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"http:\/\/www.expertwitnessinconstruction.com\"]}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"DECEMBER 2012 BAD FAITH CASES: COURT GRANTS INSURED\u2019S MOTION TO AMEND COMPLAINT WITH BAD FAITH COUNT, BUT GRANTS PARTIAL PROTECTIVE ORDER TO CARRIER, SHIELDING IT FROM DISCOVERY ON RELATED BAD FAITH CLAIMS - Advise &amp; Consult, Inc.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/december-2012-bad-faith-cases-court-grants-insureds-motion-to-amend-complaint-with-bad-faith-count-but-grants-partial-protective-order-to-carrier-shielding-it-from-discovery-on-related-bad\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"DECEMBER 2012 BAD FAITH CASES: COURT GRANTS INSURED\u2019S MOTION TO AMEND COMPLAINT WITH BAD FAITH COUNT, BUT GRANTS PARTIAL PROTECTIVE ORDER TO CARRIER, SHIELDING IT FROM DISCOVERY ON RELATED BAD FAITH CLAIMS - Advise &amp; Consult, Inc.","og_description":"December 29, 2012 In Raritan Bay Fed. Credit Union v. CUMIS Ins. Soc\u2019y, Inc., the insured sought discovery and to amend its complaint after its bad faith claims were initially dismissed without prejudice in 2009. (See this case). The carrier objected on several grounds, seeking to: (1) preclude the insured from conducting discovery on the&hellip; Continue reading DECEMBER 2012 BAD FAITH CASES: COURT GRANTS INSURED\u2019S MOTION TO AMEND COMPLAINT WITH BAD FAITH COUNT, BUT GRANTS PARTIAL PROTECTIVE ORDER TO CARRIER, SHIELDING IT FROM DISCOVERY ON RELATED BAD FAITH CLAIMS","og_url":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/december-2012-bad-faith-cases-court-grants-insureds-motion-to-amend-complaint-with-bad-faith-count-but-grants-partial-protective-order-to-carrier-shielding-it-from-discovery-on-related-bad\/","og_site_name":"Advise &amp; Consult, Inc.","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Advise-Consult-Inc-126949043996790\/","article_published_time":"2013-01-16T15:18:54+00:00","article_modified_time":"2013-01-16T15:21:16+00:00","author":"admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@adviseconsult","twitter_site":"@adviseconsult","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"admin","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/december-2012-bad-faith-cases-court-grants-insureds-motion-to-amend-complaint-with-bad-faith-count-but-grants-partial-protective-order-to-carrier-shielding-it-from-discovery-on-related-bad\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/december-2012-bad-faith-cases-court-grants-insureds-motion-to-amend-complaint-with-bad-faith-count-but-grants-partial-protective-order-to-carrier-shielding-it-from-discovery-on-related-bad\/"},"author":{"name":"admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/0a11abe008083d5fb19c2b0feefe7bd7"},"headline":"DECEMBER 2012 BAD FAITH CASES: COURT GRANTS INSURED\u2019S MOTION TO AMEND COMPLAINT WITH BAD FAITH COUNT, BUT GRANTS PARTIAL PROTECTIVE ORDER TO CARRIER, SHIELDING IT FROM DISCOVERY ON RELATED BAD FAITH CLAIMS","datePublished":"2013-01-16T15:18:54+00:00","dateModified":"2013-01-16T15:21:16+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/december-2012-bad-faith-cases-court-grants-insureds-motion-to-amend-complaint-with-bad-faith-count-but-grants-partial-protective-order-to-carrier-shielding-it-from-discovery-on-related-bad\/"},"wordCount":360,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#organization"},"keywords":["Bad Faith Insurance Claim"],"articleSection":["Insurance Claims"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/december-2012-bad-faith-cases-court-grants-insureds-motion-to-amend-complaint-with-bad-faith-count-but-grants-partial-protective-order-to-carrier-shielding-it-from-discovery-on-related-bad\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/december-2012-bad-faith-cases-court-grants-insureds-motion-to-amend-complaint-with-bad-faith-count-but-grants-partial-protective-order-to-carrier-shielding-it-from-discovery-on-related-bad\/","url":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/december-2012-bad-faith-cases-court-grants-insureds-motion-to-amend-complaint-with-bad-faith-count-but-grants-partial-protective-order-to-carrier-shielding-it-from-discovery-on-related-bad\/","name":"DECEMBER 2012 BAD FAITH CASES: COURT GRANTS INSURED\u2019S MOTION TO AMEND COMPLAINT WITH BAD FAITH COUNT, BUT GRANTS PARTIAL PROTECTIVE ORDER TO CARRIER, SHIELDING IT FROM DISCOVERY ON RELATED BAD FAITH CLAIMS - Advise &amp; Consult, Inc.","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2013-01-16T15:18:54+00:00","dateModified":"2013-01-16T15:21:16+00:00","inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/december-2012-bad-faith-cases-court-grants-insureds-motion-to-amend-complaint-with-bad-faith-count-but-grants-partial-protective-order-to-carrier-shielding-it-from-discovery-on-related-bad\/"]}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/","name":"Advise &amp; Consult, Inc.","description":"Construction Expert Witnesses","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#organization","name":"Advise & Consult","url":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/AC-Red-Logo.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/AC-Red-Logo.png","width":162,"height":75,"caption":"Advise & Consult"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Advise-Consult-Inc-126949043996790\/","https:\/\/x.com\/adviseconsult","https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company-beta\/204526\/","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/user\/MrConstructionExpert"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/0a11abe008083d5fb19c2b0feefe7bd7","name":"admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/b01e71b7acadd7657af782b7ad1a30cc?s=96&d=mm&r=pg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/b01e71b7acadd7657af782b7ad1a30cc?s=96&d=mm&r=pg","caption":"admin"},"sameAs":["http:\/\/www.expertwitnessinconstruction.com"]}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p2ztG6-jp","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1203","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1203"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1203\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1203"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1203"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1203"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}