{"id":1583,"date":"2013-05-02T06:18:34","date_gmt":"2013-05-02T12:18:34","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/?p=1583"},"modified":"2013-04-30T16:18:56","modified_gmt":"2013-04-30T22:18:56","slug":"sixth-circuit-holds-that-insurer-is-required-to-defend-contractor-in-claim-by-customer-as-your-work-exclusion-in-cgl-policy-is-inapplicable","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/sixth-circuit-holds-that-insurer-is-required-to-defend-contractor-in-claim-by-customer-as-your-work-exclusion-in-cgl-policy-is-inapplicable\/","title":{"rendered":"Sixth Circuit Holds That Insurer Is Required to Defend Contractor in Claim by Customer, as &#8220;Your Work&#8221; Exclusion in CGL Policy Is Inapplicable"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Peter Georgiton &#8211; April 25, 2013<\/p>\n<p>In Forrest Construction, Inc. v. The Cincinnati Insurance Co., No. 11-6262, 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 722 (6th Cir.), the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit held that an insurer breached its policy with an insured contractor when it declined to defend the contractor from a counterclaim for defective workmanship asserted by the contractor\u2019s former customer. The case arose out of the contractor\u2019s construction of a house for the customer. The contractor filed suit against the customer, following a dispute over the amount owed for the house. The customer counterclaimed, alleging there were defects in the workmanship of the house. In particular, the customer alleged there was a substantial amount of cracking in the foundation, which caused \u201ca potentially deadly collapse of the residence.\u201d Though the customer did not specifically allege that any particular subcontractors were responsible for the defective workmanship, the counterclaim broadly alleged that the contractor \u201crecklessly performed, or caused to be performed\u201d the defective work.<\/p>\n<p>The contractor maintained a CGL insurance policy and tendered the counterclaim to its insurer for a defense. The insurer, however, declined to provide a defense, taking the position that, though the policy provides coverage for \u201cproperty damage,\u201d coverage is excluded for damage to \u201cyour work.\u201d Though the policy\u2019s &#8220;your work&#8221; exclusion did not apply \u201cif the damaged work or the work out of which the damage arises was performed on your behalf by a subcontractor,\u201d the insurer contended that the counterclaim did not specifically allege damage caused by a subcontractor and that this exception was therefore inapplicable.<\/p>\n<p>The contractor subsequently sued the insurer for breach of contract, declaratory judgment, bad faith, and violation of the Tennessee Consumer Protection Act. Applying Tennessee law, the Sixth Circuit held that the insurer had a duty to defend the contractor. The court noted that, \u201c[f]or a duty to defend to arise, the underlying complaint must make sufficient allegations concerning the nature of the damages sought to trigger the duty to defend, or, keeping in mind that ambiguity is construed in favor of the insured, to alert [the insurer] to further inquire if the allegations are not clear.\u201d The court found that the allegations in the counterclaim put the insurer on notice that there was an \u201coccurrence\u201d resulting in \u201cproperty damage.\u201d Moreover, the allegations put the insurer on notice that the work was possibly done by an entity other than the contractor, as the counterclaim alleged that the work was not only performed by the contractor, but was alternatively \u201ccaused to be performed\u201d by that contractor. The court noted that the only way work could be \u201ccaused to be performed\u201d to the house would be through the use of a subcontractor. Accordingly, the counterclaim sufficiently alleged facts indicating that the \u201cyour work\u201d exclusion did not apply, and the insurer owed the contractor a duty to defend.<\/p>\n<p>The insurer alternatively pointed to the Tennessee Supreme Court\u2019s decision in Travelers Indemnity Co. v. Moore &amp; Associates, Inc., 216 SW.3d 302 (Tenn. 2007), claiming that, to constitute \u201cproperty damage\u201d under a policy, the damage at issue must go beyond the mere replacement of a defective component or correction of a faulty installation. The court found that Travelers was not an impediment to a finding of a duty to defend, interpreting that case as only clarifying existing law to provide that \u201c\u2018property damage\u2019 occurs when one component (here, the faulty foundation) of a finished projected (the house) damages another component.\u201d Though the counterclaim\u2019s allegations as to the extent of damage were admittedly \u201cambiguous,\u201d the allegations clearly implied that the faulty foundation caused damage to other parts of the house, triggering a duty to defend.<\/p>\n<p>via <a href=\"http:\/\/www.jdsupra.com\/legalnews\/sixth-circuit-holds-that-insurer-is-requ-92364\/\">Sixth Circuit Holds That Insurer Is Required to Defend Contractor in Claim by Customer, as &#8220;Your Work&#8221; Exclusion in CGL Policy Is Inapplicable | Dinsmore &amp; Shohl LLP &#8211; JDSupra<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Peter Georgiton &#8211; April 25, 2013 In Forrest Construction, Inc. v. The Cincinnati Insurance Co., No. 11-6262, 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 722 (6th Cir.), the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit held that an insurer breached its policy with an insured contractor when it declined to defend the contractor from a counterclaim&hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/sixth-circuit-holds-that-insurer-is-required-to-defend-contractor-in-claim-by-customer-as-your-work-exclusion-in-cgl-policy-is-inapplicable\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Sixth Circuit Holds That Insurer Is Required to Defend Contractor in Claim by Customer, as &#8220;Your Work&#8221; Exclusion in CGL Policy Is Inapplicable<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[30,3],"tags":[270,19,57,56],"class_list":["post-1583","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-general-liability-policy","category-insurance-claims","tag-cgl-insurance-policy","tag-construction-defects-2","tag-duty-to-defend-2","tag-property-damage","entry"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v25.0 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Sixth Circuit Holds That Insurer Is Required to Defend Contractor in Claim by Customer, as &quot;Your Work&quot; Exclusion in CGL Policy Is Inapplicable - Advise &amp; Consult, Inc.<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/sixth-circuit-holds-that-insurer-is-required-to-defend-contractor-in-claim-by-customer-as-your-work-exclusion-in-cgl-policy-is-inapplicable\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Sixth Circuit Holds That Insurer Is Required to Defend Contractor in Claim by Customer, as &quot;Your Work&quot; Exclusion in CGL Policy Is Inapplicable - Advise &amp; Consult, Inc.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Peter Georgiton &#8211; April 25, 2013 In Forrest Construction, Inc. v. The Cincinnati Insurance Co., No. 11-6262, 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 722 (6th Cir.), the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit held that an insurer breached its policy with an insured contractor when it declined to defend the contractor from a counterclaim&hellip; Continue reading Sixth Circuit Holds That Insurer Is Required to Defend Contractor in Claim by Customer, as &#8220;Your Work&#8221; Exclusion in CGL Policy Is Inapplicable\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/sixth-circuit-holds-that-insurer-is-required-to-defend-contractor-in-claim-by-customer-as-your-work-exclusion-in-cgl-policy-is-inapplicable\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Advise &amp; Consult, Inc.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Advise-Consult-Inc-126949043996790\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2013-05-02T12:18:34+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@adviseconsult\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@adviseconsult\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/sixth-circuit-holds-that-insurer-is-required-to-defend-contractor-in-claim-by-customer-as-your-work-exclusion-in-cgl-policy-is-inapplicable\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/sixth-circuit-holds-that-insurer-is-required-to-defend-contractor-in-claim-by-customer-as-your-work-exclusion-in-cgl-policy-is-inapplicable\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/0a11abe008083d5fb19c2b0feefe7bd7\"},\"headline\":\"Sixth Circuit Holds That Insurer Is Required to Defend Contractor in Claim by Customer, as &#8220;Your Work&#8221; Exclusion in CGL Policy Is Inapplicable\",\"datePublished\":\"2013-05-02T12:18:34+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/sixth-circuit-holds-that-insurer-is-required-to-defend-contractor-in-claim-by-customer-as-your-work-exclusion-in-cgl-policy-is-inapplicable\/\"},\"wordCount\":665,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#organization\"},\"keywords\":[\"CGL Insurance Policy\",\"construction defects\",\"duty to defend\",\"property damage\"],\"articleSection\":[\"General Liability Policy\",\"Insurance Claims\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/sixth-circuit-holds-that-insurer-is-required-to-defend-contractor-in-claim-by-customer-as-your-work-exclusion-in-cgl-policy-is-inapplicable\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/sixth-circuit-holds-that-insurer-is-required-to-defend-contractor-in-claim-by-customer-as-your-work-exclusion-in-cgl-policy-is-inapplicable\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/sixth-circuit-holds-that-insurer-is-required-to-defend-contractor-in-claim-by-customer-as-your-work-exclusion-in-cgl-policy-is-inapplicable\/\",\"name\":\"Sixth Circuit Holds That Insurer Is Required to Defend Contractor in Claim by Customer, as \\\"Your Work\\\" Exclusion in CGL Policy Is Inapplicable - Advise &amp; Consult, Inc.\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2013-05-02T12:18:34+00:00\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/sixth-circuit-holds-that-insurer-is-required-to-defend-contractor-in-claim-by-customer-as-your-work-exclusion-in-cgl-policy-is-inapplicable\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"Advise &amp; Consult, Inc.\",\"description\":\"Construction Expert Witnesses\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Advise & Consult\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/AC-Red-Logo.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/AC-Red-Logo.png\",\"width\":162,\"height\":75,\"caption\":\"Advise & Consult\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Advise-Consult-Inc-126949043996790\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/adviseconsult\",\"https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company-beta\/204526\/\",\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/user\/MrConstructionExpert\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/0a11abe008083d5fb19c2b0feefe7bd7\",\"name\":\"admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/b01e71b7acadd7657af782b7ad1a30cc?s=96&d=mm&r=pg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/b01e71b7acadd7657af782b7ad1a30cc?s=96&d=mm&r=pg\",\"caption\":\"admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"http:\/\/www.expertwitnessinconstruction.com\"]}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Sixth Circuit Holds That Insurer Is Required to Defend Contractor in Claim by Customer, as \"Your Work\" Exclusion in CGL Policy Is Inapplicable - Advise &amp; Consult, Inc.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/sixth-circuit-holds-that-insurer-is-required-to-defend-contractor-in-claim-by-customer-as-your-work-exclusion-in-cgl-policy-is-inapplicable\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Sixth Circuit Holds That Insurer Is Required to Defend Contractor in Claim by Customer, as \"Your Work\" Exclusion in CGL Policy Is Inapplicable - Advise &amp; Consult, Inc.","og_description":"Peter Georgiton &#8211; April 25, 2013 In Forrest Construction, Inc. v. The Cincinnati Insurance Co., No. 11-6262, 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 722 (6th Cir.), the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit held that an insurer breached its policy with an insured contractor when it declined to defend the contractor from a counterclaim&hellip; Continue reading Sixth Circuit Holds That Insurer Is Required to Defend Contractor in Claim by Customer, as &#8220;Your Work&#8221; Exclusion in CGL Policy Is Inapplicable","og_url":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/sixth-circuit-holds-that-insurer-is-required-to-defend-contractor-in-claim-by-customer-as-your-work-exclusion-in-cgl-policy-is-inapplicable\/","og_site_name":"Advise &amp; Consult, Inc.","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Advise-Consult-Inc-126949043996790\/","article_published_time":"2013-05-02T12:18:34+00:00","author":"admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@adviseconsult","twitter_site":"@adviseconsult","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"admin","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/sixth-circuit-holds-that-insurer-is-required-to-defend-contractor-in-claim-by-customer-as-your-work-exclusion-in-cgl-policy-is-inapplicable\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/sixth-circuit-holds-that-insurer-is-required-to-defend-contractor-in-claim-by-customer-as-your-work-exclusion-in-cgl-policy-is-inapplicable\/"},"author":{"name":"admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/0a11abe008083d5fb19c2b0feefe7bd7"},"headline":"Sixth Circuit Holds That Insurer Is Required to Defend Contractor in Claim by Customer, as &#8220;Your Work&#8221; Exclusion in CGL Policy Is Inapplicable","datePublished":"2013-05-02T12:18:34+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/sixth-circuit-holds-that-insurer-is-required-to-defend-contractor-in-claim-by-customer-as-your-work-exclusion-in-cgl-policy-is-inapplicable\/"},"wordCount":665,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#organization"},"keywords":["CGL Insurance Policy","construction defects","duty to defend","property damage"],"articleSection":["General Liability Policy","Insurance Claims"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/sixth-circuit-holds-that-insurer-is-required-to-defend-contractor-in-claim-by-customer-as-your-work-exclusion-in-cgl-policy-is-inapplicable\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/sixth-circuit-holds-that-insurer-is-required-to-defend-contractor-in-claim-by-customer-as-your-work-exclusion-in-cgl-policy-is-inapplicable\/","url":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/sixth-circuit-holds-that-insurer-is-required-to-defend-contractor-in-claim-by-customer-as-your-work-exclusion-in-cgl-policy-is-inapplicable\/","name":"Sixth Circuit Holds That Insurer Is Required to Defend Contractor in Claim by Customer, as \"Your Work\" Exclusion in CGL Policy Is Inapplicable - Advise &amp; Consult, Inc.","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2013-05-02T12:18:34+00:00","inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/sixth-circuit-holds-that-insurer-is-required-to-defend-contractor-in-claim-by-customer-as-your-work-exclusion-in-cgl-policy-is-inapplicable\/"]}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/","name":"Advise &amp; Consult, Inc.","description":"Construction Expert Witnesses","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#organization","name":"Advise & Consult","url":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/AC-Red-Logo.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/AC-Red-Logo.png","width":162,"height":75,"caption":"Advise & Consult"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Advise-Consult-Inc-126949043996790\/","https:\/\/x.com\/adviseconsult","https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company-beta\/204526\/","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/user\/MrConstructionExpert"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/0a11abe008083d5fb19c2b0feefe7bd7","name":"admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/b01e71b7acadd7657af782b7ad1a30cc?s=96&d=mm&r=pg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/b01e71b7acadd7657af782b7ad1a30cc?s=96&d=mm&r=pg","caption":"admin"},"sameAs":["http:\/\/www.expertwitnessinconstruction.com"]}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p2ztG6-px","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1583","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1583"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1583\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1583"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1583"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1583"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}