{"id":2876,"date":"2014-04-17T06:38:39","date_gmt":"2014-04-17T12:38:39","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/?p=2876"},"modified":"2014-04-15T16:39:22","modified_gmt":"2014-04-15T22:39:22","slug":"daubert-testimony-based-experience","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/daubert-testimony-based-experience\/","title":{"rendered":"Daubert: Testimony Based on Experience"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Joshua Fruchter, Esq. &#8211; April 15, 2014<\/p>\n<p>The Supreme Court\u2019s decision in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, 509 U.S. 579 (1993) requires trial courts to ensure that expert testimony admitted is reliable. Perhaps one of the trickier contexts in which courts must apply this standard is expert testimony based on experience.\u00a0 To be sure, the Advisory Committee Notes to Rule 702 of the Federal Rules of Evidence recognize that \u201c[s]ome types of expert testimony will not rely on anything like a scientific method [and] . . . [i]n certain fields, experience is the predominant, if not sole, basis for a great deal of reliable expert testimony.\u201d Nevertheless, because expert testimony based on experience poses a higher risk of conclusory opinions, an expert relying on experience must \u201cexplain how that experience leads to the conclusions reached, why that experience is a sufficient basis for the opinion, and how that experience is reliably applied to the facts.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>With these principles in mind, the District Court for the Southern District of New York, in Reach Music Publishing, Inc. v. Warner Chappell Music, Inc., 2013 WL 6767806 (S.D.N.Y., December 23, 2013), recently evaluated the admissibility of a report authored by an attorney concerning custom and practice in the music publishing industry based on his extensive experience negotiating songwriter and similar agreements.<\/p>\n<p>The facts in Reach Music were fairly straightforward. David Reeves was a songwriter who co-wrote compositions for the musical group Run-D.M.C. In May 1988, Reeves signed a \u201csongwriter agreement\u201d (the \u201c1988 Agreement\u201d) that, unbeknownst to him, transferred his rights in certain compositions to an entity called Protoons. Reeves did not retain a copy of the 1988 Agreement.<\/p>\n<p>Nearly twenty years later, in July 2007, Reeves assigned his rights in these same compositions to an entity called Reach Global. Extensive due diligence by Reach Global did not turn up the 1988 Agreement or any other evidence of Protoons\u2019 prior interest in the compositions, and accordingly Reach Global paid $55,000 to Reeves for the assignment.<\/p>\n<p>They\u2019re Playing Our Song<\/p>\n<p>Subsequently, the CEO of Reach Global, Michael Closter, communicated with one of Protoons\u2019 attorneys, Mark Levinsohn, after Reach Global learned that an affiliate of Protoons was using the compositions that Reeves had assigned.\u00a0 Levinsohn advised Closter that Reeves had signed away all of his rights in the compositions to Protoons, but repeatedly refused to provide any documentation or other evidence of this fact, or even to confirm whether a written agreement with Reeves existed.<\/p>\n<p>Reeves and Reach Global ultimately sued Protoons, and Protoons \u00a0thereafter produced the 1988 Agreement during discovery. After Reach Global\u2019s suit was dismissed, Protoons filed a counterclaim against Reach Global and its affiliates for tortious interference with the 1988 Agreement for inducing Reeves to sue Protoons in violation of a covenant not to sue in the 1988 Agreement.<\/p>\n<p>To defeat the tortious interference claim under New York state law, Reach Global needed to prove that it did not have \u201cactual knowledge\u201d of the 1988 Agreement at the time when it induced Reeves to sue Protoons. To that end, Reach Global presented the testimony of Robert Allen, a lawyer with more than 18 years of contracting experience in the music publishing industry.\u00a0 In a written report, Allen stated that, based on his professional experience, Levinsohn\u2019s statements and conduct in response to Reach Global\u2019s inquiries about Protoons\u2019 rights in Reeves\u2019 compositions were contrary to the custom and practice in the music publishing industry. Specifically, Allen stated that he had \u201cnever\u201d encountered an attorney who behaved as Levinsohn had in asserting a client\u2019s ownership in a composition, while withholding the documentation evidencing such ownership until compelled to produce it during discovery after a lawsuit was filed. Indeed, Allen opined that Levinsohn\u2019s statements and conduct were more consistent with that of a music publisher who does not actually own the copyright he claims to own.<\/p>\n<p>Protoons moved to strike Allen\u2019s report, but the Court denied the motion. It found Allen\u2019s report relevant insofar as if it were the custom and practice in the music publishing industry to provide copies of a contract upon inquiry by a party such as Reach Global, then Levinsohn\u2019s failure to provide a copy of the 1988 Agreement to Closter likely led Closter to conclude that no such agreement actually existed. In which case, Protoons would be unable to establish the \u201cactual knowledge\u201d element of its tortious interference claim.<\/p>\n<p>The Court also found Allen\u2019s expert testimony reliable considering the report explained how Allen\u2019s experience led to his conclusion that it is the custom and practice in the music publishing industry to provide documentation to demonstrate a copyright holder\u2019s rights under the circumstances involving Closter and Levinsohn.<\/p>\n<p>Please share your thoughts. Have you ever been involved with either opposing, or moving for the admission of expert testimony based on experience? What was the outcome?<\/p>\n<p>via <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ims-expertservices.com\/bullseye-blog\/april-2014\/daubert-testimony-based-on-experience\/?feed=BullsEye-Blog&amp;utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=email&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+BullsEyeBlog+%28BullsEye+Blog%29\">Daubert: Testimony Based on Experience<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Joshua Fruchter, Esq. &#8211; April 15, 2014 The Supreme Court\u2019s decision in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, 509 U.S. 579 (1993) requires trial courts to ensure that expert testimony admitted is reliable. Perhaps one of the trickier contexts in which courts must apply this standard is expert testimony based on experience.\u00a0 To be sure, the&hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/daubert-testimony-based-experience\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Daubert: Testimony Based on Experience<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[436,7],"tags":[518,17],"class_list":["post-2876","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-dispute-resolution-2","category-expert-witness","tag-daubert-testimony","tag-expert-witness-2","entry"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v25.0 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Daubert: Testimony Based on Experience - Advise &amp; Consult, Inc.<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/daubert-testimony-based-experience\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Daubert: Testimony Based on Experience - Advise &amp; Consult, Inc.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Joshua Fruchter, Esq. &#8211; April 15, 2014 The Supreme Court\u2019s decision in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, 509 U.S. 579 (1993) requires trial courts to ensure that expert testimony admitted is reliable. Perhaps one of the trickier contexts in which courts must apply this standard is expert testimony based on experience.\u00a0 To be sure, the&hellip; Continue reading Daubert: Testimony Based on Experience\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/daubert-testimony-based-experience\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Advise &amp; Consult, Inc.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Advise-Consult-Inc-126949043996790\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2014-04-17T12:38:39+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@adviseconsult\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@adviseconsult\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/daubert-testimony-based-experience\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/daubert-testimony-based-experience\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/0a11abe008083d5fb19c2b0feefe7bd7\"},\"headline\":\"Daubert: Testimony Based on Experience\",\"datePublished\":\"2014-04-17T12:38:39+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/daubert-testimony-based-experience\/\"},\"wordCount\":807,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#organization\"},\"keywords\":[\"Daubert Testimony\",\"expert witness\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Dispute Resolution\",\"Expert Witness\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/daubert-testimony-based-experience\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/daubert-testimony-based-experience\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/daubert-testimony-based-experience\/\",\"name\":\"Daubert: Testimony Based on Experience - Advise &amp; Consult, Inc.\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2014-04-17T12:38:39+00:00\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/daubert-testimony-based-experience\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"Advise &amp; Consult, Inc.\",\"description\":\"Construction Expert Witnesses\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Advise & Consult\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/AC-Red-Logo.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/AC-Red-Logo.png\",\"width\":162,\"height\":75,\"caption\":\"Advise & Consult\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Advise-Consult-Inc-126949043996790\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/adviseconsult\",\"https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company-beta\/204526\/\",\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/user\/MrConstructionExpert\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/0a11abe008083d5fb19c2b0feefe7bd7\",\"name\":\"admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/b01e71b7acadd7657af782b7ad1a30cc?s=96&d=mm&r=pg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/b01e71b7acadd7657af782b7ad1a30cc?s=96&d=mm&r=pg\",\"caption\":\"admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"http:\/\/www.expertwitnessinconstruction.com\"]}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Daubert: Testimony Based on Experience - Advise &amp; Consult, Inc.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/daubert-testimony-based-experience\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Daubert: Testimony Based on Experience - Advise &amp; Consult, Inc.","og_description":"Joshua Fruchter, Esq. &#8211; April 15, 2014 The Supreme Court\u2019s decision in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, 509 U.S. 579 (1993) requires trial courts to ensure that expert testimony admitted is reliable. Perhaps one of the trickier contexts in which courts must apply this standard is expert testimony based on experience.\u00a0 To be sure, the&hellip; Continue reading Daubert: Testimony Based on Experience","og_url":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/daubert-testimony-based-experience\/","og_site_name":"Advise &amp; Consult, Inc.","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Advise-Consult-Inc-126949043996790\/","article_published_time":"2014-04-17T12:38:39+00:00","author":"admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@adviseconsult","twitter_site":"@adviseconsult","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/daubert-testimony-based-experience\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/daubert-testimony-based-experience\/"},"author":{"name":"admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/0a11abe008083d5fb19c2b0feefe7bd7"},"headline":"Daubert: Testimony Based on Experience","datePublished":"2014-04-17T12:38:39+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/daubert-testimony-based-experience\/"},"wordCount":807,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#organization"},"keywords":["Daubert Testimony","expert witness"],"articleSection":["Dispute Resolution","Expert Witness"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/daubert-testimony-based-experience\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/daubert-testimony-based-experience\/","url":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/daubert-testimony-based-experience\/","name":"Daubert: Testimony Based on Experience - Advise &amp; Consult, Inc.","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2014-04-17T12:38:39+00:00","inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/daubert-testimony-based-experience\/"]}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/","name":"Advise &amp; Consult, Inc.","description":"Construction Expert Witnesses","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#organization","name":"Advise & Consult","url":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/AC-Red-Logo.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/AC-Red-Logo.png","width":162,"height":75,"caption":"Advise & Consult"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Advise-Consult-Inc-126949043996790\/","https:\/\/x.com\/adviseconsult","https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company-beta\/204526\/","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/user\/MrConstructionExpert"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/0a11abe008083d5fb19c2b0feefe7bd7","name":"admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/b01e71b7acadd7657af782b7ad1a30cc?s=96&d=mm&r=pg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/b01e71b7acadd7657af782b7ad1a30cc?s=96&d=mm&r=pg","caption":"admin"},"sameAs":["http:\/\/www.expertwitnessinconstruction.com"]}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p2ztG6-Ko","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2876","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2876"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2876\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2876"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2876"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2876"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}