{"id":883981,"date":"2015-10-07T10:10:49","date_gmt":"2015-10-07T16:10:49","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/?p=883981"},"modified":"2015-10-07T10:55:46","modified_gmt":"2015-10-07T16:55:46","slug":"expert-witness-code-of-conduct","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/expert-witness-code-of-conduct\/","title":{"rendered":"Expert Witness Code of Conduct"},"content":{"rendered":"

Eugene Peterson | Advise & Consult, Inc. | October 7, 2015<\/p>\n

While traveling in Great Britain this past week I had the opportunity to do a little firsthand observation and research regarding conduct and ethics of testifying expert witnesses in England as compared to the United States.<\/p>\n

Expert witnesses in Great Britain\u00a0are surrounded by a suspicion of trickery based upon the cynical understanding that experts are paid by attorneys to help them win their cases.\u00a0 And further that their fees can be based in whole or part upon whether or not they win the case.<\/p>\n

Therefore the way the case is presented has a great impact upon the truth and the outcome of the case.\u00a0 Reckless delivery of evidence is a significant cause for concern in the United Kingdom.\u00a0 Their Academy of Experts has produced a set of rules and a code setting the standards for expert witnesses.\u00a0 I know of no formal Code of Conduct in the United States.<\/p>\n

As a practicing Construction Defects Expert Witness I now list the guidelines and rules of our British counterparts with the hope that it can be a reminder of what represents a standard of good conduct.<\/p>\n

\u201cExpert witnesses shall not do anything in the course of practicing as an expert, in any manner which compromises or impairs or is likely to compromise or impair any of the following:<\/p>\n

    \n
  1. The expert\u2019s independence, impartiality, objectivity and integrity;<\/li>\n
  2. The expert\u2019s duty to the Court or tribunal;<\/li>\n
  3. The good reputation of the expert or of experts generally;<\/li>\n
  4. The expert\u2019s proper standard of work; and<\/li>\n
  5. The expert\u2019s duty to maintain confidentiality.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    An expert who is retained or employed in any contentious proceeding shall not enter into any arrangement which could compromise his impartiality or make his fee dependent on the outcome of the case nor should he accept any benefits other than his fee and expenses.<\/p>\n

    An expert should not accept instructions in any matter where there is an actual or potential conflict of interest.\u00a0 Notwithstanding this rule, if full disclosure is made to the judge or to those appointing him, the expert may in appropriate cases accept instructions when those concerned specifically acknowledge the disclosure.\u00a0 Should an actual or potential conflict occur after instructions have been accepted, the expert witness shall immediately notify all concerned and in appropriate cases resign his appointment.<\/p>\n

    An expert shall for the protection of his client maintain with a reputable insurer proper insurance for an adequate indemnity.<\/p>\n

    Experts shall not publicize their practices in any manner which may reasonably be regarded as being in bad taste.\u00a0 Publicity must not be inaccurate or misleading in any way.<\/p>\n

    An expert shall comply with all appropriate Codes of Practice and Guidelines.\u201d<\/p>\n

    The rules from the United Kingdom make a reasonable degree of common sense and for the most part are demonstrated in the actions of most honorable experts we encounter here in the United States.\u00a0 However we have stumbled upon a few expert witnesses that are not transparent, that misbehave and do not represent their clients properly.\u00a0 Here are a few examples:<\/p>\n