{"id":884785,"date":"2015-11-04T13:40:17","date_gmt":"2015-11-04T20:40:17","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/?p=884785"},"modified":"2015-11-04T13:40:17","modified_gmt":"2015-11-04T20:40:17","slug":"ma-appeals-court-ruling-contractor-justified-not-paying-subcontractor-that-refused-to-perform-work","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/ma-appeals-court-ruling-contractor-justified-not-paying-subcontractor-that-refused-to-perform-work\/","title":{"rendered":"MA Appeals Court Ruling: Contractor Justified not Paying Subcontractor that Refused to Perform Work"},"content":{"rendered":"

Murtha Cullina LLP | October 22, 2015<\/p>\n

Summary<\/strong><\/u><\/p>\n

The general contractor on a public demolition project paid nothing to a subcontractor that had performed the majority of its work but refused to perform work that it claimed was outside of its scope of work<\/a>. The subcontractor sued the general contractor and after cross-motions for summary judgment the Superior Court sided with the general contractor, holding that the work in dispute was within the subcontractor\u2019s scope and that the subcontractor breached the subcontract by refusing to perform the work. The Superior Court also held that the subcontractor was not entitled to be paid for the work it did perform because it had not substantially performed its obligations under the subcontract. The subcontractor appealed, and the Massachusetts Appeals Court affirmed the Superior Court\u2019s decision.\u00a0Acme Abatement Contractor, Inc. v. S&R Corporation<\/u>, No. 2014-P-257, 2015 Mass. App. Unpub. LEXIS 855 (Aug. 20, 2015). Click\u00a0here<\/a>\u00a0to view the Appeals Court decision.<\/p>\n

Contracting Background<\/strong><\/u><\/p>\n

S&R Corp. (“S&R”) was awarded a demolition contract by the Town of Weymouth (the “Town”). Part of S&R\u2019s work included the demolition of concrete bleachers adjacent to an athletic field. S&R subcontracted the asbestos abatement work to Acme Abatement Contractor, Inc. (“Acme”). Among other things, Acme was required to remove asbestos containing paint from the bleachers prior to demolition.<\/p>\n

Scope Dispute Arises<\/strong><\/u><\/p>\n

After Acme had commenced work, it informed S&R that it would remove paint only from the side walls of the bleachers but not the risers because Acme believed that paint did not contain asbestos and, therefore, was not within its scope. S&R directed Acme to the project specifications and identified the contract language that it believed clearly required Acme to remove the riser paint. Despite this language, Acme claimed it did not have to remove the riser paint and even went so far as to have the riser paint tested, which test results came back negative for asbestos. Even though tests performed after the subcontract was signed and work had commenced showed that the riser paint did not contain asbestos, the subcontract language included the risers within Acme\u2019s scope and Acme “owned” that work. Nevertheless, Acme refused to remove the riser paint.<\/p>\n

Acme performed the remainder of its obligations and then abandoned the project without removing the riser paint. S&R was forced to engage a substitute contractor to remove the riser paint because the project schedule was in jeopardy and S&R faced the prospect of being assessed liquidated damages by the Town if it did not complete the project on time. S&R did not issue payment for any of Acme\u2019s work, even the two-thirds of the subcontract work that Acme performed, on the ground that Acme had materially breached its subcontract.<\/p>\n

Subcontractor Sues and Contractor Wins Summary Judgment<\/u><\/p>\n

Acme brought suit against S&R seeking $145,000 in damages for breach of contract<\/a> and quantum meruit. Acme also sought treble damages and attorneys\u2019 fees under M.G.L. c. 93A, for a total of damages in excess of $450,000. Both parties eventually moved for summary judgment. The Superior Court granted summary judgment in S&R\u2019s favor finding that: (1) the subcontract required the removal of the riser paint; (2) the subcontract required that Acme perform the disputed work under protest and that Acme\u2019s failure to do so was a material breach of the subcontract; (3) Acme had failed to provide required closeout documents; and, (4) Acme could not recover under quantum meruit for the work it did perform because it did not substantially complete its subcontract obligations.<\/p>\n

Subcontractor Appeals<\/u><\/p>\n

Acme appealed to the Massachusetts Appeals Court, which affirmed the Superior Court\u2019s decision in S&R\u2019s favor. Rather than address whether the removal of the riser paint was within Acme\u2019s scope, the Appeals Court held that Acme breached the subcontract by not performing the disputed work as required by the subcontract. The relevant language provided:<\/p>\n

In the event of a dispute, controversy or claim between Contractor and Subcontractor, Subcontractor agrees to proceed with the Work or extra work without delay and without regard to such dispute, controversy or claim or the tendency (sic) of any proceeding in relation to the same. The failure of Subcontractor to comply with the provisions of this paragraph shall constitute a material breach of this agreement \u2026.<\/p>\n

The Appeals Court found that…<\/p>\n

To finish reading this article<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Murtha Cullina LLP | October 22, 2015 Summary The general contractor on a public demolition project paid nothing to a subcontractor that had performed the majority of its work but refused to perform work that it claimed was outside of its scope of work. The subcontractor sued the general contractor and after cross-motions for summary… Continue reading MA Appeals Court Ruling: Contractor Justified not Paying Subcontractor that Refused to Perform Work<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[9,172],"tags":[158,224,8903],"class_list":["post-884785","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-construction-contracts","category-construction-law-2","tag-breach-of-contract","tag-construction-contract","tag-scope-of-work","entry"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"yoast_head":"\nMA Appeals Court Ruling: Contractor Justified not Paying Subcontractor that Refused to Perform Work - Advise & Consult, Inc.<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"contractor paid nothing to a subcontractor that had performed most of its work but refused to perform work that it claimed outside of its scope of work\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/ma-appeals-court-ruling-contractor-justified-not-paying-subcontractor-that-refused-to-perform-work\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"MA Appeals Court Ruling: Contractor Justified not Paying Subcontractor that Refused to Perform Work - Advise & Consult, Inc.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"contractor paid nothing to a subcontractor that had performed most of its work but refused to perform work that it claimed outside of its scope of work\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/ma-appeals-court-ruling-contractor-justified-not-paying-subcontractor-that-refused-to-perform-work\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Advise & Consult, Inc.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Advise-Consult-Inc-126949043996790\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2015-11-04T20:40:17+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@adviseconsult\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@adviseconsult\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/ma-appeals-court-ruling-contractor-justified-not-paying-subcontractor-that-refused-to-perform-work\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/ma-appeals-court-ruling-contractor-justified-not-paying-subcontractor-that-refused-to-perform-work\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/0a11abe008083d5fb19c2b0feefe7bd7\"},\"headline\":\"MA Appeals Court Ruling: Contractor Justified not Paying Subcontractor that Refused to Perform Work\",\"datePublished\":\"2015-11-04T20:40:17+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/ma-appeals-court-ruling-contractor-justified-not-paying-subcontractor-that-refused-to-perform-work\/\"},\"wordCount\":755,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#organization\"},\"keywords\":[\"Breach of Contract\",\"Construction Contract\",\"Scope of Work\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Construction Contracts\",\"Construction Law\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/ma-appeals-court-ruling-contractor-justified-not-paying-subcontractor-that-refused-to-perform-work\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/ma-appeals-court-ruling-contractor-justified-not-paying-subcontractor-that-refused-to-perform-work\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/ma-appeals-court-ruling-contractor-justified-not-paying-subcontractor-that-refused-to-perform-work\/\",\"name\":\"MA Appeals Court Ruling: Contractor Justified not Paying Subcontractor that Refused to Perform Work - Advise & Consult, Inc.\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2015-11-04T20:40:17+00:00\",\"description\":\"contractor paid nothing to a subcontractor that had performed most of its work but refused to perform work that it claimed outside of its scope of work\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/ma-appeals-court-ruling-contractor-justified-not-paying-subcontractor-that-refused-to-perform-work\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"Advise & Consult, Inc.\",\"description\":\"Construction Expert Witnesses\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Advise & Consult\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/AC-Red-Logo.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/AC-Red-Logo.png\",\"width\":162,\"height\":75,\"caption\":\"Advise & Consult\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Advise-Consult-Inc-126949043996790\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/adviseconsult\",\"https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company-beta\/204526\/\",\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/user\/MrConstructionExpert\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/0a11abe008083d5fb19c2b0feefe7bd7\",\"name\":\"admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/b01e71b7acadd7657af782b7ad1a30cc?s=96&d=mm&r=pg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/b01e71b7acadd7657af782b7ad1a30cc?s=96&d=mm&r=pg\",\"caption\":\"admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"http:\/\/www.expertwitnessinconstruction.com\"]}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"MA Appeals Court Ruling: Contractor Justified not Paying Subcontractor that Refused to Perform Work - Advise & Consult, Inc.","description":"contractor paid nothing to a subcontractor that had performed most of its work but refused to perform work that it claimed outside of its scope of work","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/ma-appeals-court-ruling-contractor-justified-not-paying-subcontractor-that-refused-to-perform-work\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"MA Appeals Court Ruling: Contractor Justified not Paying Subcontractor that Refused to Perform Work - Advise & Consult, Inc.","og_description":"contractor paid nothing to a subcontractor that had performed most of its work but refused to perform work that it claimed outside of its scope of work","og_url":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/ma-appeals-court-ruling-contractor-justified-not-paying-subcontractor-that-refused-to-perform-work\/","og_site_name":"Advise & Consult, Inc.","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Advise-Consult-Inc-126949043996790\/","article_published_time":"2015-11-04T20:40:17+00:00","author":"admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@adviseconsult","twitter_site":"@adviseconsult","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/ma-appeals-court-ruling-contractor-justified-not-paying-subcontractor-that-refused-to-perform-work\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/ma-appeals-court-ruling-contractor-justified-not-paying-subcontractor-that-refused-to-perform-work\/"},"author":{"name":"admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/0a11abe008083d5fb19c2b0feefe7bd7"},"headline":"MA Appeals Court Ruling: Contractor Justified not Paying Subcontractor that Refused to Perform Work","datePublished":"2015-11-04T20:40:17+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/ma-appeals-court-ruling-contractor-justified-not-paying-subcontractor-that-refused-to-perform-work\/"},"wordCount":755,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#organization"},"keywords":["Breach of Contract","Construction Contract","Scope of Work"],"articleSection":["Construction Contracts","Construction Law"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/ma-appeals-court-ruling-contractor-justified-not-paying-subcontractor-that-refused-to-perform-work\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/ma-appeals-court-ruling-contractor-justified-not-paying-subcontractor-that-refused-to-perform-work\/","url":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/ma-appeals-court-ruling-contractor-justified-not-paying-subcontractor-that-refused-to-perform-work\/","name":"MA Appeals Court Ruling: Contractor Justified not Paying Subcontractor that Refused to Perform Work - Advise & Consult, Inc.","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2015-11-04T20:40:17+00:00","description":"contractor paid nothing to a subcontractor that had performed most of its work but refused to perform work that it claimed outside of its scope of work","inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/ma-appeals-court-ruling-contractor-justified-not-paying-subcontractor-that-refused-to-perform-work\/"]}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/","name":"Advise & Consult, Inc.","description":"Construction Expert Witnesses","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#organization","name":"Advise & Consult","url":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/AC-Red-Logo.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/AC-Red-Logo.png","width":162,"height":75,"caption":"Advise & Consult"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Advise-Consult-Inc-126949043996790\/","https:\/\/x.com\/adviseconsult","https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company-beta\/204526\/","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/user\/MrConstructionExpert"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/0a11abe008083d5fb19c2b0feefe7bd7","name":"admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/b01e71b7acadd7657af782b7ad1a30cc?s=96&d=mm&r=pg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/b01e71b7acadd7657af782b7ad1a30cc?s=96&d=mm&r=pg","caption":"admin"},"sameAs":["http:\/\/www.expertwitnessinconstruction.com"]}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p2ztG6-3IaJ","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/884785","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=884785"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/884785\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":884786,"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/884785\/revisions\/884786"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=884785"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=884785"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=884785"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}