{"id":885105,"date":"2015-11-11T12:13:37","date_gmt":"2015-11-11T19:13:37","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/?p=885105"},"modified":"2015-11-11T12:13:37","modified_gmt":"2015-11-11T19:13:37","slug":"california-appeals-court-rejects-insurers-escape-clause-and-confirms-tolling-of-statute-of-limitations-for-equitable-contribution-claims","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/california-appeals-court-rejects-insurers-escape-clause-and-confirms-tolling-of-statute-of-limitations-for-equitable-contribution-claims\/","title":{"rendered":"California Appeals Court Rejects Insurer\u2019s \u201cEscape\u201d Clause and Confirms Tolling of Statute of Limitations for Equitable Contribution Claims"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Timothy P. Lindell | Gordon &amp; Rees LLP | November 5, 2015<\/p>\n<p>In\u00a0<em>Underwriters of Interest v Probuilders Specialty Ins. Co.<\/em>\u00a0(Case No. D066615, filed 10\/23\/15), the California Court of Appeal for the Fourth District, Division One, rejected an insurer\u2019s \u201cescape\u201d clause, ruled that a Contractors Special Conditions endorsement was inapplicable, and confirmed that the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/construction-and-design-claims-beware-of-the-statute-of-limitations-and-repose\/\" target=\"_blank\">statute of limitation<\/a> for an insurer\u2019s claim for equitable contribution against a co-carrier is tolled until it makes its last defense payment.<\/p>\n<p>Underwriters insured Pacific Trades Construction &amp; Development (\u201cPTCD\u201d) from 2001 to 2003. Probuilders insured PTCD from 2002 to 2004. Pursuant to its policies, Underwriters agreed to defend PTCD in a <a href=\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/requirements-tighten-for-construction-defect-claims\/\" target=\"_blank\">construction defect<\/a> action arising out of the construction of single family homes. In contrast, Probuilders denied PTCD\u2019s tender arguing that its policies only provided a duty to defend when \u201cno other insurance affording a defense against such a suit is available to [the insured].\u201d In addition, Probuilders argued its policy included a Contractors Special Conditions (\u201cCSC\u201d) endorsement which provided that as a \u201ccondition precedent to this policy applying to any claim in whole or in part based upon work performed by independent contractors,\u201d PTCD must have: (1) written indemnity agreements with each subcontractor hired; (2) certificates of insurance from each subcontractor\u2019s insurer showing PTCD as an additional insured; and (3) maintained records evidencing PTCD\u2019s compliance with these obligations.<\/p>\n<p>Turning first to Probuilders\u2019 defense obligation, the Appellate Court, citing\u00a0<em>Edmondson Property Management v. Kwock<\/em>\u00a0(2007) 156 Cal.App.4th 197, 203-204, held that Probuilders\u2019 other insurance clause was an \u201cescape\u201d clause disfavored under the law.<\/p>\n<p>[C]ourts have considered this type of \u201cother insurance\u201d clause as an \u201cescape\u201d clause, a clause which attempts to have coverage, paid for with the insured\u2019s premiums, evaporate in the presence of other insurance\u2026.Escape clauses are discouraged and generally not given effect in actions where the insurance company who paid the liability is seeking equitable contribution from the carrier who is seeking to avoid the risk it was paid to cover.<\/p>\n<p>Reasoning the policies issued by Underwriters and Probuilders were not completely overlapping and provided coverage for at least different periods of time, the Appellate Court refused to enforce Probuilders\u2019 other insurance clause.<\/p>\n<p>The appeals court also rejected Probuilders\u2019 argument that its CSC endorsement obviated a duty to defend because PTCD had failed to secure indemnity and\/or additional insured coverage from all of its subcontractors. Noting Probuilders had not conclusively established that all of the claims against PTCD were limited to work performed by subcontractors and that while there was evidence of incomplete compliance with the CSC endorsement at least one subcontract had complied, the court found there was a question of fact precluding summary judgment in Probuilders\u2019 favor.<\/p>\n<p>Next, the appeals court found Underwriter\u2019s equitable contribution claim was timely because&#8230;<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.lexology.com\/library\/detail.aspx?g=f7aeeef5-4d28-426f-b263-a75135bc9077&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+General+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2015-11-06&amp;utm_term=\" target=\"_blank\">To finish reading this article<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Timothy P. Lindell | Gordon &amp; Rees LLP | November 5, 2015 In\u00a0Underwriters of Interest v Probuilders Specialty Ins. Co.\u00a0(Case No. D066615, filed 10\/23\/15), the California Court of Appeal for the Fourth District, Division One, rejected an insurer\u2019s \u201cescape\u201d clause, ruled that a Contractors Special Conditions endorsement was inapplicable, and confirmed that the statute of&hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/california-appeals-court-rejects-insurers-escape-clause-and-confirms-tolling-of-statute-of-limitations-for-equitable-contribution-claims\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">California Appeals Court Rejects Insurer\u2019s \u201cEscape\u201d Clause and Confirms Tolling of Statute of Limitations for Equitable Contribution Claims<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[4,3],"tags":[19,187],"class_list":["post-885105","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-construction-defects","category-insurance-claims","tag-construction-defects-2","tag-statute-of-limitations","entry"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v25.0 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>California Appeals Court Rejects Insurer\u2019s \u201cEscape\u201d Clause and Confirms Tolling of Statute of Limitations for Equitable Contribution Claims - Advise &amp; Consult, Inc.<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Contractors Special Conditions endorsement was inapplicable, and confirmed that the statute of limitation for an insurer\u2019s claim for equitable contribution\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/california-appeals-court-rejects-insurers-escape-clause-and-confirms-tolling-of-statute-of-limitations-for-equitable-contribution-claims\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"California Appeals Court Rejects Insurer\u2019s \u201cEscape\u201d Clause and Confirms Tolling of Statute of Limitations for Equitable Contribution Claims - Advise &amp; Consult, Inc.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Contractors Special Conditions endorsement was inapplicable, and confirmed that the statute of limitation for an insurer\u2019s claim for equitable contribution\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/california-appeals-court-rejects-insurers-escape-clause-and-confirms-tolling-of-statute-of-limitations-for-equitable-contribution-claims\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Advise &amp; Consult, Inc.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Advise-Consult-Inc-126949043996790\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2015-11-11T19:13:37+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@adviseconsult\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@adviseconsult\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/california-appeals-court-rejects-insurers-escape-clause-and-confirms-tolling-of-statute-of-limitations-for-equitable-contribution-claims\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/california-appeals-court-rejects-insurers-escape-clause-and-confirms-tolling-of-statute-of-limitations-for-equitable-contribution-claims\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/0a11abe008083d5fb19c2b0feefe7bd7\"},\"headline\":\"California Appeals Court Rejects Insurer\u2019s \u201cEscape\u201d Clause and Confirms Tolling of Statute of Limitations for Equitable Contribution Claims\",\"datePublished\":\"2015-11-11T19:13:37+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/california-appeals-court-rejects-insurers-escape-clause-and-confirms-tolling-of-statute-of-limitations-for-equitable-contribution-claims\/\"},\"wordCount\":480,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#organization\"},\"keywords\":[\"construction defects\",\"Statute of Limitations\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Construction Defects\",\"Insurance Claims\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/california-appeals-court-rejects-insurers-escape-clause-and-confirms-tolling-of-statute-of-limitations-for-equitable-contribution-claims\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/california-appeals-court-rejects-insurers-escape-clause-and-confirms-tolling-of-statute-of-limitations-for-equitable-contribution-claims\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/california-appeals-court-rejects-insurers-escape-clause-and-confirms-tolling-of-statute-of-limitations-for-equitable-contribution-claims\/\",\"name\":\"California Appeals Court Rejects Insurer\u2019s \u201cEscape\u201d Clause and Confirms Tolling of Statute of Limitations for Equitable Contribution Claims - Advise &amp; Consult, Inc.\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2015-11-11T19:13:37+00:00\",\"description\":\"Contractors Special Conditions endorsement was inapplicable, and confirmed that the statute of limitation for an insurer\u2019s claim for equitable contribution\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/california-appeals-court-rejects-insurers-escape-clause-and-confirms-tolling-of-statute-of-limitations-for-equitable-contribution-claims\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"Advise &amp; Consult, Inc.\",\"description\":\"Construction Expert Witnesses\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Advise & Consult\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/AC-Red-Logo.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/AC-Red-Logo.png\",\"width\":162,\"height\":75,\"caption\":\"Advise & Consult\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Advise-Consult-Inc-126949043996790\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/adviseconsult\",\"https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company-beta\/204526\/\",\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/user\/MrConstructionExpert\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/0a11abe008083d5fb19c2b0feefe7bd7\",\"name\":\"admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/b01e71b7acadd7657af782b7ad1a30cc?s=96&d=mm&r=pg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/b01e71b7acadd7657af782b7ad1a30cc?s=96&d=mm&r=pg\",\"caption\":\"admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"http:\/\/www.expertwitnessinconstruction.com\"]}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"California Appeals Court Rejects Insurer\u2019s \u201cEscape\u201d Clause and Confirms Tolling of Statute of Limitations for Equitable Contribution Claims - Advise &amp; Consult, Inc.","description":"Contractors Special Conditions endorsement was inapplicable, and confirmed that the statute of limitation for an insurer\u2019s claim for equitable contribution","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/california-appeals-court-rejects-insurers-escape-clause-and-confirms-tolling-of-statute-of-limitations-for-equitable-contribution-claims\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"California Appeals Court Rejects Insurer\u2019s \u201cEscape\u201d Clause and Confirms Tolling of Statute of Limitations for Equitable Contribution Claims - Advise &amp; Consult, Inc.","og_description":"Contractors Special Conditions endorsement was inapplicable, and confirmed that the statute of limitation for an insurer\u2019s claim for equitable contribution","og_url":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/california-appeals-court-rejects-insurers-escape-clause-and-confirms-tolling-of-statute-of-limitations-for-equitable-contribution-claims\/","og_site_name":"Advise &amp; Consult, Inc.","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Advise-Consult-Inc-126949043996790\/","article_published_time":"2015-11-11T19:13:37+00:00","author":"admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@adviseconsult","twitter_site":"@adviseconsult","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"admin","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/california-appeals-court-rejects-insurers-escape-clause-and-confirms-tolling-of-statute-of-limitations-for-equitable-contribution-claims\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/california-appeals-court-rejects-insurers-escape-clause-and-confirms-tolling-of-statute-of-limitations-for-equitable-contribution-claims\/"},"author":{"name":"admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/0a11abe008083d5fb19c2b0feefe7bd7"},"headline":"California Appeals Court Rejects Insurer\u2019s \u201cEscape\u201d Clause and Confirms Tolling of Statute of Limitations for Equitable Contribution Claims","datePublished":"2015-11-11T19:13:37+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/california-appeals-court-rejects-insurers-escape-clause-and-confirms-tolling-of-statute-of-limitations-for-equitable-contribution-claims\/"},"wordCount":480,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#organization"},"keywords":["construction defects","Statute of Limitations"],"articleSection":["Construction Defects","Insurance Claims"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/california-appeals-court-rejects-insurers-escape-clause-and-confirms-tolling-of-statute-of-limitations-for-equitable-contribution-claims\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/california-appeals-court-rejects-insurers-escape-clause-and-confirms-tolling-of-statute-of-limitations-for-equitable-contribution-claims\/","url":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/california-appeals-court-rejects-insurers-escape-clause-and-confirms-tolling-of-statute-of-limitations-for-equitable-contribution-claims\/","name":"California Appeals Court Rejects Insurer\u2019s \u201cEscape\u201d Clause and Confirms Tolling of Statute of Limitations for Equitable Contribution Claims - Advise &amp; Consult, Inc.","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2015-11-11T19:13:37+00:00","description":"Contractors Special Conditions endorsement was inapplicable, and confirmed that the statute of limitation for an insurer\u2019s claim for equitable contribution","inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/california-appeals-court-rejects-insurers-escape-clause-and-confirms-tolling-of-statute-of-limitations-for-equitable-contribution-claims\/"]}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/","name":"Advise &amp; Consult, Inc.","description":"Construction Expert Witnesses","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#organization","name":"Advise & Consult","url":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/AC-Red-Logo.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/AC-Red-Logo.png","width":162,"height":75,"caption":"Advise & Consult"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Advise-Consult-Inc-126949043996790\/","https:\/\/x.com\/adviseconsult","https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company-beta\/204526\/","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/user\/MrConstructionExpert"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/0a11abe008083d5fb19c2b0feefe7bd7","name":"admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/b01e71b7acadd7657af782b7ad1a30cc?s=96&d=mm&r=pg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/b01e71b7acadd7657af782b7ad1a30cc?s=96&d=mm&r=pg","caption":"admin"},"sameAs":["http:\/\/www.expertwitnessinconstruction.com"]}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p2ztG6-3IfT","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/885105","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=885105"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/885105\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":885110,"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/885105\/revisions\/885110"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=885105"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=885105"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=885105"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}