{"id":886372,"date":"2016-01-12T11:50:29","date_gmt":"2016-01-12T18:50:29","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/?p=886372"},"modified":"2016-01-12T11:50:29","modified_gmt":"2016-01-12T18:50:29","slug":"differing-site-conditions-claim-fails-in-washington-state","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/differing-site-conditions-claim-fails-in-washington-state\/","title":{"rendered":"Differing Site Conditions Claim Fails in Washington State"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Meredith C. Eilers | Bernstein Shur Sawyer &amp; Nelson PA | December 29, 2015<\/p>\n<p>A recent decision from an appeals court in Washington State is a reminder of the difficulties in proving a <a href=\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/skip-the-site-visit-lose-a-differing-site-conditions-claim\/\" target=\"_blank\">differing site conditions claim<\/a>, and\u00a0the importance of contract documents in asserting that claim.<\/p>\n<p>In\u00a0<em>King County v. Vinci Construction Grands Projets<\/em>, \u2014 P.3d \u2014, No. 70432-01, 2015 WL 6865706 (Wash. App. Nov. 9, 2015), the Court of Appeals of Washington affirmed the trial court\u2019s conclusion that the contractor had not proven its <a href=\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/differing-site-condition-defense-rejected\/\" target=\"_blank\">differing site conditions claim<\/a>. Vinci Construction Grands Projets (\u201cVPFK\u201d) was hired by King County to construct portions of the tunneling work for a major expansion of the County\u2019s wastewater treatment system. While tunneling, VPFK encountered a number of problems that resulted in significant delays in completion of the project,\u00a0\u00a0asserting that it encountered soil conditions materially different from what was anticipated. Specifically, VPFK claimed that the frequency of transitions between one soil condition and another was higher than expected and caused substantial slowing of the progress of tunneling because equipment operators had to adjust equipment more often to account for the changes.<\/p>\n<p>The county rejected it\u2019s request for a change order related to the differing site conditions and the trial court granted summary judgment in favor of the county on that issue, dismissing VPFK\u2019s claim for differing site conditions based on the transitions between plastic and non-plastic soils.<\/p>\n<p>VPFK then\u00a0appealed the dismissal of its <a href=\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/engineer-not-liable-for-telling-contractor-it-would-be-paid-for-differing-conditions\/\" target=\"_blank\">differing site conditions<\/a> counterclaim, asserting that it encountered more frequent changes between plastic and non-plastic soils than the contract documents indicated. The appeals court disagreed, referencing two earlier decisions in its jurisdiction,\u00a0noting the following requirements for establishing a differing site condition claim:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>The contract documents indicated certain conditions<\/li>\n<li>The contractor reasonably relied on those indications when making its bid<\/li>\n<li>Actual conditions materially differed from those which were indicated in the contract<\/li>\n<li>The materially different conditions were not foreseeable<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>The court concluded that VPFK had\u00a0failed to establish its claim with respect to the first two elements. First, that the contract documents made no representation, whether implicit or explicit, regarding the frequency or number of transitions; the documents indicated only that that soil conditions were variable. Further, the documents explicitly stated that bidders should make their own interpretations and draw their own conclusions about <a href=\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/homebuyers-on-their-own-to-check-soil-stability\/\" target=\"_blank\">soil conditions<\/a> along the tunnel. Second,\u00a0that VPFK had failed to establish that it reasonably relied on the contract indications when preparing its bit. The experts that VPFK claimed it had retained to analyze the site conditions had not made any explicit predictions regarding transitions.<\/p>\n<p>This case is yet another reminder of the importance of contract documents in asserting or defending a differing site conditions claim and the difficulties in succeeding in prosecuting a claim. The risk of unforeseen conditions can often fall on the general contractor, with disastrous results.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.lexology.com\/library\/detail.aspx?g=5bef6d58-b1f8-44ca-afbf-2e9bf5dc7f36&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+General+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2016-01-04&amp;utm_term=\" target=\"_blank\">Source<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Meredith C. Eilers | Bernstein Shur Sawyer &amp; Nelson PA | December 29, 2015 A recent decision from an appeals court in Washington State is a reminder of the difficulties in proving a differing site conditions claim, and\u00a0the importance of contract documents in asserting that claim. In\u00a0King County v. Vinci Construction Grands Projets, \u2014 P.3d&hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/differing-site-conditions-claim-fails-in-washington-state\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Differing Site Conditions Claim Fails in Washington State<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[9,4,3],"tags":[19,8994,3,396],"class_list":["post-886372","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-construction-contracts","category-construction-defects","category-insurance-claims","tag-construction-defects-2","tag-differing-site-conditions","tag-insurance-claims","tag-soil-conditions","entry"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v25.0 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Differing Site Conditions Claim Fails in Washington State - Advise &amp; Consult, Inc.<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"A recent decision from an appeals court reminds of the difficulties in proving a differing site conditions claim, and the importance of contract documents\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/differing-site-conditions-claim-fails-in-washington-state\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Differing Site Conditions Claim Fails in Washington State - Advise &amp; Consult, Inc.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"A recent decision from an appeals court reminds of the difficulties in proving a differing site conditions claim, and the importance of contract documents\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/differing-site-conditions-claim-fails-in-washington-state\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Advise &amp; Consult, Inc.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Advise-Consult-Inc-126949043996790\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2016-01-12T18:50:29+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@adviseconsult\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@adviseconsult\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/differing-site-conditions-claim-fails-in-washington-state\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/differing-site-conditions-claim-fails-in-washington-state\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/0a11abe008083d5fb19c2b0feefe7bd7\"},\"headline\":\"Differing Site Conditions Claim Fails in Washington State\",\"datePublished\":\"2016-01-12T18:50:29+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/differing-site-conditions-claim-fails-in-washington-state\/\"},\"wordCount\":479,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#organization\"},\"keywords\":[\"construction defects\",\"Differing Site Conditions\",\"Insurance Claims\",\"Soil Conditions\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Construction Contracts\",\"Construction Defects\",\"Insurance Claims\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/differing-site-conditions-claim-fails-in-washington-state\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/differing-site-conditions-claim-fails-in-washington-state\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/differing-site-conditions-claim-fails-in-washington-state\/\",\"name\":\"Differing Site Conditions Claim Fails in Washington State - Advise &amp; Consult, Inc.\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2016-01-12T18:50:29+00:00\",\"description\":\"A recent decision from an appeals court reminds of the difficulties in proving a differing site conditions claim, and the importance of contract documents\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/differing-site-conditions-claim-fails-in-washington-state\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"Advise &amp; Consult, Inc.\",\"description\":\"Construction Expert Witnesses\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Advise & Consult\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/AC-Red-Logo.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/AC-Red-Logo.png\",\"width\":162,\"height\":75,\"caption\":\"Advise & Consult\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Advise-Consult-Inc-126949043996790\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/adviseconsult\",\"https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company-beta\/204526\/\",\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/user\/MrConstructionExpert\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/0a11abe008083d5fb19c2b0feefe7bd7\",\"name\":\"admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/b01e71b7acadd7657af782b7ad1a30cc?s=96&d=mm&r=pg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/b01e71b7acadd7657af782b7ad1a30cc?s=96&d=mm&r=pg\",\"caption\":\"admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"http:\/\/www.expertwitnessinconstruction.com\"]}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Differing Site Conditions Claim Fails in Washington State - Advise &amp; Consult, Inc.","description":"A recent decision from an appeals court reminds of the difficulties in proving a differing site conditions claim, and the importance of contract documents","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/differing-site-conditions-claim-fails-in-washington-state\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Differing Site Conditions Claim Fails in Washington State - Advise &amp; Consult, Inc.","og_description":"A recent decision from an appeals court reminds of the difficulties in proving a differing site conditions claim, and the importance of contract documents","og_url":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/differing-site-conditions-claim-fails-in-washington-state\/","og_site_name":"Advise &amp; Consult, Inc.","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Advise-Consult-Inc-126949043996790\/","article_published_time":"2016-01-12T18:50:29+00:00","author":"admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@adviseconsult","twitter_site":"@adviseconsult","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"admin","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/differing-site-conditions-claim-fails-in-washington-state\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/differing-site-conditions-claim-fails-in-washington-state\/"},"author":{"name":"admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/0a11abe008083d5fb19c2b0feefe7bd7"},"headline":"Differing Site Conditions Claim Fails in Washington State","datePublished":"2016-01-12T18:50:29+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/differing-site-conditions-claim-fails-in-washington-state\/"},"wordCount":479,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#organization"},"keywords":["construction defects","Differing Site Conditions","Insurance Claims","Soil Conditions"],"articleSection":["Construction Contracts","Construction Defects","Insurance Claims"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/differing-site-conditions-claim-fails-in-washington-state\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/differing-site-conditions-claim-fails-in-washington-state\/","url":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/differing-site-conditions-claim-fails-in-washington-state\/","name":"Differing Site Conditions Claim Fails in Washington State - Advise &amp; Consult, Inc.","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2016-01-12T18:50:29+00:00","description":"A recent decision from an appeals court reminds of the difficulties in proving a differing site conditions claim, and the importance of contract documents","inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/differing-site-conditions-claim-fails-in-washington-state\/"]}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/","name":"Advise &amp; Consult, Inc.","description":"Construction Expert Witnesses","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#organization","name":"Advise & Consult","url":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/AC-Red-Logo.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/AC-Red-Logo.png","width":162,"height":75,"caption":"Advise & Consult"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Advise-Consult-Inc-126949043996790\/","https:\/\/x.com\/adviseconsult","https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company-beta\/204526\/","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/user\/MrConstructionExpert"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/0a11abe008083d5fb19c2b0feefe7bd7","name":"admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/b01e71b7acadd7657af782b7ad1a30cc?s=96&d=mm&r=pg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/b01e71b7acadd7657af782b7ad1a30cc?s=96&d=mm&r=pg","caption":"admin"},"sameAs":["http:\/\/www.expertwitnessinconstruction.com"]}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p2ztG6-3IAk","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/886372","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=886372"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/886372\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":886373,"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/886372\/revisions\/886373"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=886372"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=886372"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=886372"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}