{"id":889237,"date":"2016-06-07T16:36:33","date_gmt":"2016-06-07T22:36:33","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/?p=889237"},"modified":"2016-06-07T16:36:33","modified_gmt":"2016-06-07T22:36:33","slug":"floridas-2013-adoption-of-daubert-standard-should-be-applied-retroactively","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/floridas-2013-adoption-of-daubert-standard-should-be-applied-retroactively\/","title":{"rendered":"Florida&#8217;s 2013 Adoption of Daubert Standard Should Be Applied Retroactively"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Jeffrey Kuntz | <a href=\"http:\/\/www.floridalegalblog.org\/2016\/06\/floridas-2013-adoption-of-daubert.html\" target=\"_blank\">The Florida Legal Blog<\/a> | June 1, 2016<\/p>\n<div class=\"tr_bq\">\n<div>In <i>Bunin v. Matrix Initiatives, Inc.<\/i> (4D14-3579), the Fourth District affirmed the trial court&#8217;s retroactive application of the Florida Legislature&#8217;s 2013 adoption of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/florida-bar-pushes-back-against-expert-testimony-law\/\" target=\"_blank\">federal <i>Daubert <\/i>standard<\/a> for the admission of <a href=\"http:\/\/adviseandconsult.net\/experts.php\">expert testimony<\/a>. The court stated:<\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<blockquote>\n<div>An order on a motion to exclude expert testimony is reviewed for an abuse of discretion. <i>Booker v. Sumter Cty. Sheriff\u2019s Office<\/i>, 166 So. 3d 189, 194 n.2 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015). But the issue of whether a statute applies retroactively is a question of law reviewed de novo. <i>Bionetics Corp. v.Kenniasty<\/i>, 69 So. 3d 943, 947 (Fla. 2011).<\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<\/blockquote>\n<blockquote>\n<div>In 2013, the Florida Legislature amended section 90.702 with the intent to adopt the federal Daubert standard for the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/daubert-testimony-based-experience\/\">admission of expert testimony<\/a>. See Ch. 2013\u2013107, \u00a7 1, Laws of Fla. (2013). On appeal, the plaintiff\u2019s primary argument is that the 2013 amendments to section 90.702 are substantive in nature and should not be applied retroactively to her case, which was filed in 2009. We disagree.<\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<\/blockquote>\n<blockquote>\n<div>It is well-settled that \u201c[p]rocedural or remedial statutes . . . are to be applied retrospectively and are to be applied to pending cases.\u201d <i>AlamoRent-A-Car, Inc. v. Mancusi<\/i>, 632 So. 2d 1352, 1358 (Fla. 1994). A statute that merely \u201crelates to the admission of evidence\u201d is generally considered procedural. <i>Windom v. State<\/i>, 656 So. 2d 432, 439 (Fla. 1995). Accordingly, as the Third District has explained, \u201csection 90.702 of the Florida Evidence Code indisputably applies retrospectively.\u201d<i>Perez v. BellSouth Telecomms., Inc.<\/i>, 138 So. 3d 492, 498 (Fla. 3rd DCA 2014).<b>1<\/b><\/div>\n<\/blockquote>\n<div><\/div>\n<blockquote>\n<div>Having carefully reviewed the record, we conclude that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in excluding the plaintiff\u2019s expert\u2019s causation opinion under <i>Daubert<\/i>, even though the expert\u2019s opinion would have been admissible under the \u201cpure opinion\u201d rule of <i>Marsh v. Valyou<\/i>, 977 So. 2d 543, 548\u201350 (Fla. 2007). Because the plaintiff\u2019s case depended upon her expert\u2019s excluded causation testimony, the summary judgment in favor of the defendants must stand.<\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<\/blockquote>\n<blockquote>\n<blockquote class=\"tr_bq\"><p><b>1<\/b> In deciding that the amendments apply retrospectively, we note that the plaintiff did not raise the argument that the 2013 amendments to section 90.702 violated the separation of powers doctrine by encroaching upon the Florida Supreme Court\u2019s authority to adopt procedural rules in Florida courts. See Art. V, \u00a7 2(a), Fla. Const.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p><!--more--><\/p>\n<p>The court also reversed a cost judgment because it included costs that were not in the &#8220;&#8216;should be&#8217; or &#8216;may be&#8217; taxed under the Statewide Uniform Guidelines for Taxation of Costs in Civil Actions, and the trial court failed to make any\u00a0specific findings in the cost judgment as to the unique and extraordinary circumstances that would justify a deviation from the guidelines.&#8221;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Jeffrey Kuntz | The Florida Legal Blog | June 1, 2016 In Bunin v. Matrix Initiatives, Inc. (4D14-3579), the Fourth District affirmed the trial court&#8217;s retroactive application of the Florida Legislature&#8217;s 2013 adoption of the federal Daubert standard for the admission of expert testimony. The court stated: An order on a motion to exclude expert&hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/floridas-2013-adoption-of-daubert-standard-should-be-applied-retroactively\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Florida&#8217;s 2013 Adoption of Daubert Standard Should Be Applied Retroactively<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[7],"tags":[98,17,94],"class_list":["post-889237","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-expert-witness","tag-daubert-challenge","tag-expert-witness-2","tag-florida","entry"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v25.0 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Florida&#039;s 2013 Adoption of Daubert Standard Should Be Applied Retroactively - Advise &amp; Consult, Inc.<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Fourth District affirmed retroactive application of the Florida Legislature&#039;s 2013 adoption of the federal Daubert standard for expert testimony\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/floridas-2013-adoption-of-daubert-standard-should-be-applied-retroactively\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Florida&#039;s 2013 Adoption of Daubert Standard Should Be Applied Retroactively - Advise &amp; Consult, Inc.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Fourth District affirmed retroactive application of the Florida Legislature&#039;s 2013 adoption of the federal Daubert standard for expert testimony\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/floridas-2013-adoption-of-daubert-standard-should-be-applied-retroactively\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Advise &amp; Consult, Inc.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Advise-Consult-Inc-126949043996790\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2016-06-07T22:36:33+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@adviseconsult\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@adviseconsult\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/floridas-2013-adoption-of-daubert-standard-should-be-applied-retroactively\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/floridas-2013-adoption-of-daubert-standard-should-be-applied-retroactively\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/0a11abe008083d5fb19c2b0feefe7bd7\"},\"headline\":\"Florida&#8217;s 2013 Adoption of Daubert Standard Should Be Applied Retroactively\",\"datePublished\":\"2016-06-07T22:36:33+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/floridas-2013-adoption-of-daubert-standard-should-be-applied-retroactively\/\"},\"wordCount\":426,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#organization\"},\"keywords\":[\"Daubert Challenge\",\"expert witness\",\"Florida\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Expert Witness\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/floridas-2013-adoption-of-daubert-standard-should-be-applied-retroactively\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/floridas-2013-adoption-of-daubert-standard-should-be-applied-retroactively\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/floridas-2013-adoption-of-daubert-standard-should-be-applied-retroactively\/\",\"name\":\"Florida's 2013 Adoption of Daubert Standard Should Be Applied Retroactively - Advise &amp; Consult, Inc.\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2016-06-07T22:36:33+00:00\",\"description\":\"Fourth District affirmed retroactive application of the Florida Legislature's 2013 adoption of the federal Daubert standard for expert testimony\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/floridas-2013-adoption-of-daubert-standard-should-be-applied-retroactively\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"Advise &amp; Consult, Inc.\",\"description\":\"Construction Expert Witnesses\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Advise & Consult\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/AC-Red-Logo.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/AC-Red-Logo.png\",\"width\":162,\"height\":75,\"caption\":\"Advise & Consult\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Advise-Consult-Inc-126949043996790\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/adviseconsult\",\"https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company-beta\/204526\/\",\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/user\/MrConstructionExpert\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/0a11abe008083d5fb19c2b0feefe7bd7\",\"name\":\"admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/b01e71b7acadd7657af782b7ad1a30cc?s=96&d=mm&r=pg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/b01e71b7acadd7657af782b7ad1a30cc?s=96&d=mm&r=pg\",\"caption\":\"admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"http:\/\/www.expertwitnessinconstruction.com\"]}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Florida's 2013 Adoption of Daubert Standard Should Be Applied Retroactively - Advise &amp; Consult, Inc.","description":"Fourth District affirmed retroactive application of the Florida Legislature's 2013 adoption of the federal Daubert standard for expert testimony","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/floridas-2013-adoption-of-daubert-standard-should-be-applied-retroactively\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Florida's 2013 Adoption of Daubert Standard Should Be Applied Retroactively - Advise &amp; Consult, Inc.","og_description":"Fourth District affirmed retroactive application of the Florida Legislature's 2013 adoption of the federal Daubert standard for expert testimony","og_url":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/floridas-2013-adoption-of-daubert-standard-should-be-applied-retroactively\/","og_site_name":"Advise &amp; Consult, Inc.","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Advise-Consult-Inc-126949043996790\/","article_published_time":"2016-06-07T22:36:33+00:00","author":"admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@adviseconsult","twitter_site":"@adviseconsult","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"admin","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/floridas-2013-adoption-of-daubert-standard-should-be-applied-retroactively\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/floridas-2013-adoption-of-daubert-standard-should-be-applied-retroactively\/"},"author":{"name":"admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/0a11abe008083d5fb19c2b0feefe7bd7"},"headline":"Florida&#8217;s 2013 Adoption of Daubert Standard Should Be Applied Retroactively","datePublished":"2016-06-07T22:36:33+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/floridas-2013-adoption-of-daubert-standard-should-be-applied-retroactively\/"},"wordCount":426,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#organization"},"keywords":["Daubert Challenge","expert witness","Florida"],"articleSection":["Expert Witness"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/floridas-2013-adoption-of-daubert-standard-should-be-applied-retroactively\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/floridas-2013-adoption-of-daubert-standard-should-be-applied-retroactively\/","url":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/floridas-2013-adoption-of-daubert-standard-should-be-applied-retroactively\/","name":"Florida's 2013 Adoption of Daubert Standard Should Be Applied Retroactively - Advise &amp; Consult, Inc.","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2016-06-07T22:36:33+00:00","description":"Fourth District affirmed retroactive application of the Florida Legislature's 2013 adoption of the federal Daubert standard for expert testimony","inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/floridas-2013-adoption-of-daubert-standard-should-be-applied-retroactively\/"]}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/","name":"Advise &amp; Consult, Inc.","description":"Construction Expert Witnesses","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#organization","name":"Advise & Consult","url":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/AC-Red-Logo.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/AC-Red-Logo.png","width":162,"height":75,"caption":"Advise & Consult"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Advise-Consult-Inc-126949043996790\/","https:\/\/x.com\/adviseconsult","https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company-beta\/204526\/","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/user\/MrConstructionExpert"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/0a11abe008083d5fb19c2b0feefe7bd7","name":"admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/b01e71b7acadd7657af782b7ad1a30cc?s=96&d=mm&r=pg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/b01e71b7acadd7657af782b7ad1a30cc?s=96&d=mm&r=pg","caption":"admin"},"sameAs":["http:\/\/www.expertwitnessinconstruction.com"]}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p2ztG6-3Jkx","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/889237","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=889237"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/889237\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":889238,"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/889237\/revisions\/889238"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=889237"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=889237"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=889237"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}