{"id":890441,"date":"2016-08-01T16:06:12","date_gmt":"2016-08-01T22:06:12","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/?p=890441"},"modified":"2016-08-01T16:06:12","modified_gmt":"2016-08-01T22:06:12","slug":"workmanship-and-earth-movement-exclusions-preclude-coverage-for-collapse-as-a-matter-of-law","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/workmanship-and-earth-movement-exclusions-preclude-coverage-for-collapse-as-a-matter-of-law\/","title":{"rendered":"Workmanship and Earth Movement Exclusions Preclude Coverage for Collapse As a Matter of Law"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Joann Selleck | <a href=\"http:\/\/propertyinsurancelawobserver.com\/2016\/07\/29\/workmanship-and-earth-movement-exclusions-preclude-coverage-for-collapse-as-a-matter-of-law\/\" target=\"_blank\">Cozen O&#8217;Connor<\/a> | July 29, 2016<\/p>\n<p>A U.S. federal district court recently granted Peerless Insurance\u2019s summary judgment motion, concluding that, as a matter of law, under Virginia law, a property policy insuring a building under renovation would not provide coverage for a <a href=\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/construing-collapse-under-a-homeowners-insurance-policy\/\" target=\"_blank\">collapsed basement<\/a> wall due to a subcontractor\u2019s lack of shoring,.\u00a0<i>Taja Investments LLC v. Peerless Ins. Co. a\/k\/a Liberty Mutual Ins. Co.<\/i>, Civ. No. 1:15-cv-01647, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 95760 (E. D. VA, July 21, 2016).<\/p>\n<p>The plaintiff insured, Taja Investments, was a construction company, which was excavating a 4-5 foot crawlspace under a building to create a space with a 9 foot depth in order to allow for additional living areas. The insured\u2019s claim arose out of the collapse of one of the basement walls due to the failure of the insured\u2019s subcontractor\u2019s \u00a0to follow construction recommendations and provide shoring as the excavation progressed. Litigation followed after Peerless declined plaintiff\u2019s claim.<\/p>\n<p>In ruling on cross summary judgment motions filed by the insured and Peerless, the court rejected the insured\u2019s arguments that: (1) while the basement wall <a href=\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/contractors-beware-subcontractor-exception-to-your-work-exclusion-may-not-save-the-day\/\" target=\"_blank\">collapse may be excluded by the workmanship exclusion<\/a>, the cost of building repair was a covered ensuing loss; \u00a0and that (2) the collapse occurred \u201cunderground,\u201d and, therefore, the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/feel-earth-move-feet-may-covered-loss-colorado\/\" target=\"_blank\">earth movement exclusion<\/a> did not apply.\u00a0 \u00a0<span id=\"more-1399\"><\/span><\/p>\n<p>The district court first concluded that the collapse was the result of the insured\u2019s own acts or omissions in failing to underpin the basement as the excavation progressed and as the construction plan required. The court noted that the over excavation coupled with the lack of underpinning caused the collapse, which the insured\u2019s own witnesses even tacitly admitted. \u00a0In following well established Virginia insurance precedent that an additional independent covered cause of loss is required in order to trigger a policy\u2019s ensuing loss provision, the court found that no such independent subsequent loss existed in the instant case. <i>See Travco Ins. Co. v. Ward<\/i>, 715 F. Supp. 2d 699, 718-19 (E.D. Va. 2010), <i>aff\u2019d<\/i>, 504 Fed. Appx. 251 (4<sup>th<\/sup> Cir. 2013) (declining to find the ensuing loss provision applicable because the relevant damage occurred gradually over a period of time and was merely a single discrete loss from a single discrete injury). In doing so, the court also departed with the recent cases that decline to require an independent and additional covered cause of loss before restoring coverage under an ensuing loss exception. <i>See<\/i> <i>Selective Way Ins. Co. v. National Fire Ins. Co. of Hartford<\/i>, 988 F. Supp. 2d 530, 538 (D. Md. 2013);<i> see also Vision One, LLC v. Philadelphia Indem. Ins. Co.<\/i> 276 P.3d 300, 308-09 (Wash. \u00a02012).<\/p>\n<p>The court was also unpersuaded by plaintiff\u2019s attempt to distinguish the cost of replacing the workmanship (which the plaintiff, itself, conceded was not covered) from the cost of replacing the structure (which the plaintiff argued was an ensuing loss), as plaintiff\u2019s argument was merely an erroneous attempt to separate cause and effect.<\/p>\n<p>The court was likewise unpersuaded by the plaintiff\u2019s argument that the earth movement exclusion did not apply since the collapse occurred \u201cunderground.\u201d Essentially, the plaintiff contended that the earth movement exclusion is only applicable to movements or vibrations at the earth\u2019s surface, yet, here, the relevant earth movement activity occurred \u201cbelow grade.\u201d\u00a0 Based on the particular exclusionary language in the Peerless policy the court determined that the policy plainly indicates that the exclusion was applicable to both man-made and naturally occurring earth movement. The court then concluded that, regardless of the fact that the loss involved \u201cbelow grade\u201d damage (<i>i.e., <\/i>in the basement area under the building), the plaintiff\u2019s relevant conduct still occurred at the earth\u2019s surface and earth movement still occurred at the earth\u2019s surface. The policy\u2019s unambiguous earth movement exclusion, therefore, applied. The policy provided no indication that it was meant to exclude below grade activity. As the trial judge stated, \u201cwhile the movement that caused the east wall\u2019s collapse occurred below grade (in the basement, below the ground level of the structure), it still involved movement of the earth surface (the uppermost layer of the soil and clay).\u201d As a result, Peerless prevailed on its motion for summary judgment; and the court denied the insured\u2019s motion for summary judgment.<\/p>\n<p>This recent decision is another example of the common coverage issues that can arise in the context of collapse.\u00a0 In relation to ensuing loss, this opinion demonstrates how, under Virginia law, an additional and independent covered loss is still a prerequisite to trigger an ensuing loss, though not all jurisdictions are in agreement with this analysis.\u00a0 This case further demonstrates that, regardless of the case law cited in support of the applicability or inapplicability of an exclusion like the earth movement exclusion here, a court will still look to the plain language of the particular exclusion at issue.\u00a0 If that exclusion is clear and unambiguous, a court is unlikely to attempt to re-write the exclusion and overall intent of the policy, but, instead, apply it. Here, and regardless of other court decisions interpreting similar <i>yet different<\/i> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/a-cautionary-insurance-tale-for-project-owners\/\" target=\"_blank\">earth movement exclusions<\/a>, the court looked to the specific exclusionary language at issue here and applied it in the true meaning of its terms.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Joann Selleck | Cozen O&#8217;Connor | July 29, 2016 A U.S. federal district court recently granted Peerless Insurance\u2019s summary judgment motion, concluding that, as a matter of law, under Virginia law, a property policy insuring a building under renovation would not provide coverage for a collapsed basement wall due to a subcontractor\u2019s lack of shoring,.\u00a0Taja&hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/workmanship-and-earth-movement-exclusions-preclude-coverage-for-collapse-as-a-matter-of-law\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Workmanship and Earth Movement Exclusions Preclude Coverage for Collapse As a Matter of Law<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[14,164,3],"tags":[8672,9582,9581],"class_list":["post-890441","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-construction-2","category-construction-dispute","category-insurance-claims","tag-collapse","tag-earth-movement-exclusion","tag-workmanship-exclusion","entry"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v25.0 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Workmanship and Earth Movement Exclusions Preclude Coverage for Collapse As a Matter of Law - Advise &amp; Consult, Inc.<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"This recent decision is another example of the common coverage issues that can arise in the context of collapse\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/workmanship-and-earth-movement-exclusions-preclude-coverage-for-collapse-as-a-matter-of-law\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Workmanship and Earth Movement Exclusions Preclude Coverage for Collapse As a Matter of Law - Advise &amp; Consult, Inc.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"This recent decision is another example of the common coverage issues that can arise in the context of collapse\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/workmanship-and-earth-movement-exclusions-preclude-coverage-for-collapse-as-a-matter-of-law\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Advise &amp; Consult, Inc.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Advise-Consult-Inc-126949043996790\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2016-08-01T22:06:12+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@adviseconsult\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@adviseconsult\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/workmanship-and-earth-movement-exclusions-preclude-coverage-for-collapse-as-a-matter-of-law\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/workmanship-and-earth-movement-exclusions-preclude-coverage-for-collapse-as-a-matter-of-law\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/0a11abe008083d5fb19c2b0feefe7bd7\"},\"headline\":\"Workmanship and Earth Movement Exclusions Preclude Coverage for Collapse As a Matter of Law\",\"datePublished\":\"2016-08-01T22:06:12+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/workmanship-and-earth-movement-exclusions-preclude-coverage-for-collapse-as-a-matter-of-law\/\"},\"wordCount\":879,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#organization\"},\"keywords\":[\"Collapse\",\"Earth Movement Exclusion\",\"Workmanship Exclusion\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Construction\",\"Construction Dispute\",\"Insurance Claims\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/workmanship-and-earth-movement-exclusions-preclude-coverage-for-collapse-as-a-matter-of-law\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/workmanship-and-earth-movement-exclusions-preclude-coverage-for-collapse-as-a-matter-of-law\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/workmanship-and-earth-movement-exclusions-preclude-coverage-for-collapse-as-a-matter-of-law\/\",\"name\":\"Workmanship and Earth Movement Exclusions Preclude Coverage for Collapse As a Matter of Law - Advise &amp; Consult, Inc.\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2016-08-01T22:06:12+00:00\",\"description\":\"This recent decision is another example of the common coverage issues that can arise in the context of collapse\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/workmanship-and-earth-movement-exclusions-preclude-coverage-for-collapse-as-a-matter-of-law\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"Advise &amp; Consult, Inc.\",\"description\":\"Construction Expert Witnesses\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Advise & Consult\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/AC-Red-Logo.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/AC-Red-Logo.png\",\"width\":162,\"height\":75,\"caption\":\"Advise & Consult\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Advise-Consult-Inc-126949043996790\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/adviseconsult\",\"https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company-beta\/204526\/\",\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/user\/MrConstructionExpert\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/0a11abe008083d5fb19c2b0feefe7bd7\",\"name\":\"admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/b01e71b7acadd7657af782b7ad1a30cc?s=96&d=mm&r=pg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/b01e71b7acadd7657af782b7ad1a30cc?s=96&d=mm&r=pg\",\"caption\":\"admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"http:\/\/www.expertwitnessinconstruction.com\"]}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Workmanship and Earth Movement Exclusions Preclude Coverage for Collapse As a Matter of Law - Advise &amp; Consult, Inc.","description":"This recent decision is another example of the common coverage issues that can arise in the context of collapse","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/workmanship-and-earth-movement-exclusions-preclude-coverage-for-collapse-as-a-matter-of-law\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Workmanship and Earth Movement Exclusions Preclude Coverage for Collapse As a Matter of Law - Advise &amp; Consult, Inc.","og_description":"This recent decision is another example of the common coverage issues that can arise in the context of collapse","og_url":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/workmanship-and-earth-movement-exclusions-preclude-coverage-for-collapse-as-a-matter-of-law\/","og_site_name":"Advise &amp; Consult, Inc.","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Advise-Consult-Inc-126949043996790\/","article_published_time":"2016-08-01T22:06:12+00:00","author":"admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@adviseconsult","twitter_site":"@adviseconsult","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/workmanship-and-earth-movement-exclusions-preclude-coverage-for-collapse-as-a-matter-of-law\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/workmanship-and-earth-movement-exclusions-preclude-coverage-for-collapse-as-a-matter-of-law\/"},"author":{"name":"admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/0a11abe008083d5fb19c2b0feefe7bd7"},"headline":"Workmanship and Earth Movement Exclusions Preclude Coverage for Collapse As a Matter of Law","datePublished":"2016-08-01T22:06:12+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/workmanship-and-earth-movement-exclusions-preclude-coverage-for-collapse-as-a-matter-of-law\/"},"wordCount":879,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#organization"},"keywords":["Collapse","Earth Movement Exclusion","Workmanship Exclusion"],"articleSection":["Construction","Construction Dispute","Insurance Claims"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/workmanship-and-earth-movement-exclusions-preclude-coverage-for-collapse-as-a-matter-of-law\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/workmanship-and-earth-movement-exclusions-preclude-coverage-for-collapse-as-a-matter-of-law\/","url":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/workmanship-and-earth-movement-exclusions-preclude-coverage-for-collapse-as-a-matter-of-law\/","name":"Workmanship and Earth Movement Exclusions Preclude Coverage for Collapse As a Matter of Law - Advise &amp; Consult, Inc.","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2016-08-01T22:06:12+00:00","description":"This recent decision is another example of the common coverage issues that can arise in the context of collapse","inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/workmanship-and-earth-movement-exclusions-preclude-coverage-for-collapse-as-a-matter-of-law\/"]}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/","name":"Advise &amp; Consult, Inc.","description":"Construction Expert Witnesses","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#organization","name":"Advise & Consult","url":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/AC-Red-Logo.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/AC-Red-Logo.png","width":162,"height":75,"caption":"Advise & Consult"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Advise-Consult-Inc-126949043996790\/","https:\/\/x.com\/adviseconsult","https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company-beta\/204526\/","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/user\/MrConstructionExpert"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/0a11abe008083d5fb19c2b0feefe7bd7","name":"admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/b01e71b7acadd7657af782b7ad1a30cc?s=96&d=mm&r=pg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/b01e71b7acadd7657af782b7ad1a30cc?s=96&d=mm&r=pg","caption":"admin"},"sameAs":["http:\/\/www.expertwitnessinconstruction.com"]}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p2ztG6-3JDX","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/890441","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=890441"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/890441\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":890444,"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/890441\/revisions\/890444"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=890441"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=890441"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=890441"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}