{"id":892166,"date":"2017-05-18T14:24:43","date_gmt":"2017-05-18T20:24:43","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/?p=892166"},"modified":"2017-05-18T14:24:43","modified_gmt":"2017-05-18T20:24:43","slug":"not-fast-insurance-company-judgment-insured-may-fact-covered","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/not-fast-insurance-company-judgment-insured-may-fact-covered\/","title":{"rendered":"Not so Fast Insurance Company, that Judgment Against your Insured May in Fact be Covered"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Adele Ridenour | <a href=\"http:\/\/www.thepolicyholderreport.com\/2017\/05\/not-so-fast-insurance-company-that-judgment-against-your-insured-may-in-fact-be-covered\/\" target=\"_blank\">The Policyholder Report<\/a> | May 11, 2017<\/p>\n<p>Yesterday, the Oregon Court of Appeals dealt a hefty blow to insurance companies seeking to exclude coverage for property damage to multi-family dwellings and for awards of attorney fees. In <em>Hunters Ridge Condominium Ass\u2019n v. Sherwood Crossing, LLC<\/em>, the Oregon Court of Appeals held that an insurance company\u2019s \u201cMulti-Unit New Residential Construction\u201d exclusion was unclear as to whether it excluded coverage for property damage to both residential-only and\u00a0mixed-use condominiums. Given there were two plausible ways to read the exclusion, the Oregon Court of Appeals held the exclusion must be construed against the insurance company.<span id=\"more-2075\"><\/span> The result was a finding in favor of coverage for the association\u2019s judgment. The case will now be remanded back to the trial court for\u00a0a determination as to how much of the judgment is covered.<\/p>\n<p>The Court of Appeals also held that an attorney fee award may also be covered either as \u201cdamages\u201d under the policy\u2019s coverage grant or as \u201ccosts taxed against the insured\u201d under the policy\u2019s Supplementary Payments provision. <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignright size-medium wp-image-2076\" src=\"http:\/\/www.thepolicyholderreport.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/268\/2017\/05\/33772075352_f7c981c4b0_z-320x179.jpg\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 320px) 100vw, 320px\" srcset=\"http:\/\/www.thepolicyholderreport.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/268\/2017\/05\/33772075352_f7c981c4b0_z-320x179.jpg 320w, http:\/\/www.thepolicyholderreport.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/268\/2017\/05\/33772075352_f7c981c4b0_z-120x67.jpg 120w, http:\/\/www.thepolicyholderreport.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/268\/2017\/05\/33772075352_f7c981c4b0_z-40x22.jpg 40w, http:\/\/www.thepolicyholderreport.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/268\/2017\/05\/33772075352_f7c981c4b0_z-80x45.jpg 80w, http:\/\/www.thepolicyholderreport.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/268\/2017\/05\/33772075352_f7c981c4b0_z-160x90.jpg 160w, http:\/\/www.thepolicyholderreport.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/268\/2017\/05\/33772075352_f7c981c4b0_z-550x308.jpg 550w, http:\/\/www.thepolicyholderreport.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/268\/2017\/05\/33772075352_f7c981c4b0_z-367x205.jpg 367w, http:\/\/www.thepolicyholderreport.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/268\/2017\/05\/33772075352_f7c981c4b0_z-275x154.jpg 275w, http:\/\/www.thepolicyholderreport.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/268\/2017\/05\/33772075352_f7c981c4b0_z-220x123.jpg 220w, http:\/\/www.thepolicyholderreport.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/268\/2017\/05\/33772075352_f7c981c4b0_z-440x246.jpg 440w, http:\/\/www.thepolicyholderreport.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/268\/2017\/05\/33772075352_f7c981c4b0_z-184x103.jpg 184w, http:\/\/www.thepolicyholderreport.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/268\/2017\/05\/33772075352_f7c981c4b0_z-138x77.jpg 138w, http:\/\/www.thepolicyholderreport.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/268\/2017\/05\/33772075352_f7c981c4b0_z-413x231.jpg 413w, http:\/\/www.thepolicyholderreport.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/268\/2017\/05\/33772075352_f7c981c4b0_z-123x69.jpg 123w, http:\/\/www.thepolicyholderreport.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/268\/2017\/05\/33772075352_f7c981c4b0_z-110x62.jpg 110w, http:\/\/www.thepolicyholderreport.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/268\/2017\/05\/33772075352_f7c981c4b0_z-330x185.jpg 330w, http:\/\/www.thepolicyholderreport.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/268\/2017\/05\/33772075352_f7c981c4b0_z-300x168.jpg 300w, http:\/\/www.thepolicyholderreport.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/268\/2017\/05\/33772075352_f7c981c4b0_z-600x336.jpg 600w, http:\/\/www.thepolicyholderreport.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/268\/2017\/05\/33772075352_f7c981c4b0_z-344x192.jpg 344w, http:\/\/www.thepolicyholderreport.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/268\/2017\/05\/33772075352_f7c981c4b0_z-55x31.jpg 55w, http:\/\/www.thepolicyholderreport.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/268\/2017\/05\/33772075352_f7c981c4b0_z.jpg 640w\" alt=\"33772075352_f7c981c4b0_z\" width=\"320\" height=\"179\" \/>This holding is especially significant because both the policy\u2019s coverage grant and\u00a0its Supplementary Payments provision are standard in most commercial general liability policies in Oregon. Furthermore, the Supplementary Payments provision typically spells out the insurer\u2019s defense obligations, meaning an award of attorney fees may now be covered so long as the insurer has a duty to defend, which is an easier duty to trigger than the duty to indemnify.<\/p>\n<p>The final piece of the case had to do with the constitutionality of an Oregon law requiring that garnishment proceedings against an insurance company be tried to the court. The Court of Appeals found that the statute at issue was unconstitutional in that either party should be entitled to a trial by jury where the case presents issues of fact to be decided.<\/p>\n<p>The takeaway from <em>Hunters Ridge<\/em> is that insurers in Oregon are likely going to take a hard look at their commercial general liability policies to see how they can try and craft their policies in such a way to prevent rulings like the one issued in <em>Hunters Ridge<\/em>. Policyholders and judgment creditors should be on the lookout for these revised insurance policies and, in the case of policyholders, try to negotiate out of any exclusionary language so as to best protect themselves for future coverage situations.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Adele Ridenour | The Policyholder Report | May 11, 2017 Yesterday, the Oregon Court of Appeals dealt a hefty blow to insurance companies seeking to exclude coverage for property damage to multi-family dwellings and for awards of attorney fees. In Hunters Ridge Condominium Ass\u2019n v. Sherwood Crossing, LLC, the Oregon Court of Appeals held that&hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/not-fast-insurance-company-judgment-insured-may-fact-covered\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Not so Fast Insurance Company, that Judgment Against your Insured May in Fact be Covered<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[3,9914,9721],"tags":[9895,528,23,56],"class_list":["post-892166","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-insurance-claims","category-insurance-coverage","category-property-damage","tag-advise-consult","tag-attorney-fees","tag-insurance-coverage","tag-property-damage","entry"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v25.0 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Not so Fast Insurance Company, that Judgment Against your Insured May in Fact be Covered - Advise &amp; Consult, Inc.<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"insurance companies dealt a hefty blow seeking to exclude coverage for property damage to multi-family dwellings and for awards of attorney fees\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/not-fast-insurance-company-judgment-insured-may-fact-covered\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Not so Fast Insurance Company, that Judgment Against your Insured May in Fact be Covered - Advise &amp; Consult, Inc.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"insurance companies dealt a hefty blow seeking to exclude coverage for property damage to multi-family dwellings and for awards of attorney fees\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/not-fast-insurance-company-judgment-insured-may-fact-covered\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Advise &amp; Consult, Inc.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Advise-Consult-Inc-126949043996790\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2017-05-18T20:24:43+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"http:\/\/www.thepolicyholderreport.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/268\/2017\/05\/33772075352_f7c981c4b0_z-320x179.jpg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@adviseconsult\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@adviseconsult\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/not-fast-insurance-company-judgment-insured-may-fact-covered\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/not-fast-insurance-company-judgment-insured-may-fact-covered\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/0a11abe008083d5fb19c2b0feefe7bd7\"},\"headline\":\"Not so Fast Insurance Company, that Judgment Against your Insured May in Fact be Covered\",\"datePublished\":\"2017-05-18T20:24:43+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/not-fast-insurance-company-judgment-insured-may-fact-covered\/\"},\"wordCount\":414,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/not-fast-insurance-company-judgment-insured-may-fact-covered\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"http:\/\/www.thepolicyholderreport.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/268\/2017\/05\/33772075352_f7c981c4b0_z-320x179.jpg\",\"keywords\":[\"Advise &amp; Consult\",\"Attorney Fees\",\"insurance coverage\",\"property damage\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Insurance Claims\",\"Insurance Coverage\",\"Property Damage\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/not-fast-insurance-company-judgment-insured-may-fact-covered\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/not-fast-insurance-company-judgment-insured-may-fact-covered\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/not-fast-insurance-company-judgment-insured-may-fact-covered\/\",\"name\":\"Not so Fast Insurance Company, that Judgment Against your Insured May in Fact be Covered - Advise &amp; Consult, Inc.\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/not-fast-insurance-company-judgment-insured-may-fact-covered\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/not-fast-insurance-company-judgment-insured-may-fact-covered\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"http:\/\/www.thepolicyholderreport.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/268\/2017\/05\/33772075352_f7c981c4b0_z-320x179.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2017-05-18T20:24:43+00:00\",\"description\":\"insurance companies dealt a hefty blow seeking to exclude coverage for property damage to multi-family dwellings and for awards of attorney fees\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/not-fast-insurance-company-judgment-insured-may-fact-covered\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/not-fast-insurance-company-judgment-insured-may-fact-covered\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"http:\/\/www.thepolicyholderreport.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/268\/2017\/05\/33772075352_f7c981c4b0_z-320x179.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"http:\/\/www.thepolicyholderreport.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/268\/2017\/05\/33772075352_f7c981c4b0_z-320x179.jpg\"},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"Advise &amp; Consult, Inc.\",\"description\":\"Construction Expert Witnesses\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Advise & Consult\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/AC-Red-Logo.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/AC-Red-Logo.png\",\"width\":162,\"height\":75,\"caption\":\"Advise & Consult\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Advise-Consult-Inc-126949043996790\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/adviseconsult\",\"https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company-beta\/204526\/\",\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/user\/MrConstructionExpert\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/0a11abe008083d5fb19c2b0feefe7bd7\",\"name\":\"admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/b01e71b7acadd7657af782b7ad1a30cc?s=96&d=mm&r=pg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/b01e71b7acadd7657af782b7ad1a30cc?s=96&d=mm&r=pg\",\"caption\":\"admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"http:\/\/www.expertwitnessinconstruction.com\"]}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Not so Fast Insurance Company, that Judgment Against your Insured May in Fact be Covered - Advise &amp; Consult, Inc.","description":"insurance companies dealt a hefty blow seeking to exclude coverage for property damage to multi-family dwellings and for awards of attorney fees","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/not-fast-insurance-company-judgment-insured-may-fact-covered\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Not so Fast Insurance Company, that Judgment Against your Insured May in Fact be Covered - Advise &amp; Consult, Inc.","og_description":"insurance companies dealt a hefty blow seeking to exclude coverage for property damage to multi-family dwellings and for awards of attorney fees","og_url":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/not-fast-insurance-company-judgment-insured-may-fact-covered\/","og_site_name":"Advise &amp; Consult, Inc.","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Advise-Consult-Inc-126949043996790\/","article_published_time":"2017-05-18T20:24:43+00:00","og_image":[{"url":"http:\/\/www.thepolicyholderreport.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/268\/2017\/05\/33772075352_f7c981c4b0_z-320x179.jpg","type":"","width":"","height":""}],"author":"admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@adviseconsult","twitter_site":"@adviseconsult","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"admin","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/not-fast-insurance-company-judgment-insured-may-fact-covered\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/not-fast-insurance-company-judgment-insured-may-fact-covered\/"},"author":{"name":"admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/0a11abe008083d5fb19c2b0feefe7bd7"},"headline":"Not so Fast Insurance Company, that Judgment Against your Insured May in Fact be Covered","datePublished":"2017-05-18T20:24:43+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/not-fast-insurance-company-judgment-insured-may-fact-covered\/"},"wordCount":414,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/not-fast-insurance-company-judgment-insured-may-fact-covered\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"http:\/\/www.thepolicyholderreport.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/268\/2017\/05\/33772075352_f7c981c4b0_z-320x179.jpg","keywords":["Advise &amp; Consult","Attorney Fees","insurance coverage","property damage"],"articleSection":["Insurance Claims","Insurance Coverage","Property Damage"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/not-fast-insurance-company-judgment-insured-may-fact-covered\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/not-fast-insurance-company-judgment-insured-may-fact-covered\/","url":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/not-fast-insurance-company-judgment-insured-may-fact-covered\/","name":"Not so Fast Insurance Company, that Judgment Against your Insured May in Fact be Covered - Advise &amp; Consult, Inc.","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/not-fast-insurance-company-judgment-insured-may-fact-covered\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/not-fast-insurance-company-judgment-insured-may-fact-covered\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"http:\/\/www.thepolicyholderreport.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/268\/2017\/05\/33772075352_f7c981c4b0_z-320x179.jpg","datePublished":"2017-05-18T20:24:43+00:00","description":"insurance companies dealt a hefty blow seeking to exclude coverage for property damage to multi-family dwellings and for awards of attorney fees","inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/not-fast-insurance-company-judgment-insured-may-fact-covered\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/not-fast-insurance-company-judgment-insured-may-fact-covered\/#primaryimage","url":"http:\/\/www.thepolicyholderreport.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/268\/2017\/05\/33772075352_f7c981c4b0_z-320x179.jpg","contentUrl":"http:\/\/www.thepolicyholderreport.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/268\/2017\/05\/33772075352_f7c981c4b0_z-320x179.jpg"},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/","name":"Advise &amp; Consult, Inc.","description":"Construction Expert Witnesses","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#organization","name":"Advise & Consult","url":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/AC-Red-Logo.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/AC-Red-Logo.png","width":162,"height":75,"caption":"Advise & Consult"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Advise-Consult-Inc-126949043996790\/","https:\/\/x.com\/adviseconsult","https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company-beta\/204526\/","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/user\/MrConstructionExpert"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/0a11abe008083d5fb19c2b0feefe7bd7","name":"admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/b01e71b7acadd7657af782b7ad1a30cc?s=96&d=mm&r=pg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/b01e71b7acadd7657af782b7ad1a30cc?s=96&d=mm&r=pg","caption":"admin"},"sameAs":["http:\/\/www.expertwitnessinconstruction.com"]}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p2ztG6-3K5M","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/892166","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=892166"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/892166\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":892167,"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/892166\/revisions\/892167"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=892166"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=892166"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=892166"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}