{"id":893315,"date":"2017-12-05T12:30:21","date_gmt":"2017-12-05T19:30:21","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/?p=893315"},"modified":"2017-12-05T12:30:21","modified_gmt":"2017-12-05T19:30:21","slug":"insurers-attempt-limit-additional-insured-status-fails","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/insurers-attempt-limit-additional-insured-status-fails\/","title":{"rendered":"Insurer&#8217;s Attempt to Limit Additional Insured Status Fails"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Tred R. Eyerly | <a href=\"http:\/\/www.insurancelawhawaii.com\/insurance_law_hawaii\/2017\/11\/insurers-attempt-to-limit-additional-insured-status-fails.html\" target=\"_blank\">Insurance Law Hawaii<\/a> | November 29, 2017<\/p>\n<p>The court disagreed with the insurer&#8217;s attempt to limit additional insured status based upon the contract between the parties.\u00a0Mays v. In re All C-Dive LLC, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 185874 (E.D. La. Nov. 9, 2017).<\/p>\n<p>Five employees of C-Dive LLC filed a lawsuit after belng injured in a pipeline explosion aboard a vessel servicing a pipeline owned by Gulf South Pipeline Company. During the work, there was a release of gas that caused an explosion and injured the employees.<\/p>\n<p>Gulf South was a subsidiary of Boardwalk Pipelines LP. Boardwalk Pipelines entered into a Master Services Agreement (MSA) with C-Dive. C-Dive and Gulf South also entered into a Scope of Work Agreement (SWA), whereby C-Dive was to decommission the pipeline. The SWA incorporated the MSA.<\/p>\n<p>The MSA applied to both Boardwalk Pipelines and its subsidiaries, including Gulf South. The agreement was &#8220;by and between Boardwalk Pipelines, LP and C-Dive, LLC.&#8221; It further stated that &#8220;reference to Boardwalk shall also include its subsidiaries, including but not limited to . . . Gulf South Pipeline Company.&#8221; The MSA required C-Drive to maintain insurance which would include Boardwalk Pipelines, LP as additional insured.<\/p>\n<p>Gulf South made third-party claims against the insurers as an additional insured under the policies issued to Baordwalk. The insurers moved for summary judgment, arguing that the MSA obligated C-Dive to name only Boardwalk Pipelines as an additional insured and not its subsidiaries.<\/p>\n<p>The court disagreed. The insurers argued that the MSA&#8217;s additional insured provision referred to &#8216;Boardwalk Pipelines LP,&#8221; rather than the shorthand, &#8220;Boardwalk.&#8221; Therefore, Gulf South was not included as an additional insured. But the plain meaning of the MSA meant that the terms &#8220;Boardwalk&#8221; and &#8220;Boardwalk Pipelines&#8221; were interchangeable. The agreement first stated that Boardwalk Pipelines LP was &#8220;hereinafter referred to as &#8216;Boardwalk.'&#8221; Thus, when the MSA used the phrase &#8220;Boardwalk,&#8221; it was referring to the entity Boardwalk Pipelines.<\/p>\n<p>Therefore, Gulf South was an additional insured under the policies.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Tred R. Eyerly | Insurance Law Hawaii | November 29, 2017 The court disagreed with the insurer&#8217;s attempt to limit additional insured status based upon the contract between the parties.\u00a0Mays v. In re All C-Dive LLC, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 185874 (E.D. La. Nov. 9, 2017). Five employees of C-Dive LLC filed a lawsuit after&hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/insurers-attempt-limit-additional-insured-status-fails\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Insurer&#8217;s Attempt to Limit Additional Insured Status Fails<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[9914],"tags":[382,9895],"class_list":["post-893315","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-insurance-coverage","tag-additional-insured","tag-advise-consult","entry"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v25.0 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Insurer&#039;s Attempt to Limit Additional Insured Status Fails - Advise &amp; Consult, Inc.<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"The court disagreed with the insurer&#039;s attempt to limit additional insured status based upon the contract between the parties\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/insurers-attempt-limit-additional-insured-status-fails\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Insurer&#039;s Attempt to Limit Additional Insured Status Fails - Advise &amp; Consult, Inc.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"The court disagreed with the insurer&#039;s attempt to limit additional insured status based upon the contract between the parties\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/insurers-attempt-limit-additional-insured-status-fails\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Advise &amp; Consult, Inc.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Advise-Consult-Inc-126949043996790\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2017-12-05T19:30:21+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@adviseconsult\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@adviseconsult\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/insurers-attempt-limit-additional-insured-status-fails\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/insurers-attempt-limit-additional-insured-status-fails\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/0a11abe008083d5fb19c2b0feefe7bd7\"},\"headline\":\"Insurer&#8217;s Attempt to Limit Additional Insured Status Fails\",\"datePublished\":\"2017-12-05T19:30:21+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/insurers-attempt-limit-additional-insured-status-fails\/\"},\"wordCount\":335,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#organization\"},\"keywords\":[\"Additional Insured\",\"Advise &amp; Consult\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Insurance Coverage\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/insurers-attempt-limit-additional-insured-status-fails\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/insurers-attempt-limit-additional-insured-status-fails\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/insurers-attempt-limit-additional-insured-status-fails\/\",\"name\":\"Insurer's Attempt to Limit Additional Insured Status Fails - Advise &amp; Consult, Inc.\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2017-12-05T19:30:21+00:00\",\"description\":\"The court disagreed with the insurer's attempt to limit additional insured status based upon the contract between the parties\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/insurers-attempt-limit-additional-insured-status-fails\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"Advise &amp; Consult, Inc.\",\"description\":\"Construction Expert Witnesses\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Advise & Consult\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/AC-Red-Logo.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/AC-Red-Logo.png\",\"width\":162,\"height\":75,\"caption\":\"Advise & Consult\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Advise-Consult-Inc-126949043996790\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/adviseconsult\",\"https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company-beta\/204526\/\",\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/user\/MrConstructionExpert\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/0a11abe008083d5fb19c2b0feefe7bd7\",\"name\":\"admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/b01e71b7acadd7657af782b7ad1a30cc?s=96&d=mm&r=pg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/b01e71b7acadd7657af782b7ad1a30cc?s=96&d=mm&r=pg\",\"caption\":\"admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"http:\/\/www.expertwitnessinconstruction.com\"]}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Insurer's Attempt to Limit Additional Insured Status Fails - Advise &amp; Consult, Inc.","description":"The court disagreed with the insurer's attempt to limit additional insured status based upon the contract between the parties","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/insurers-attempt-limit-additional-insured-status-fails\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Insurer's Attempt to Limit Additional Insured Status Fails - Advise &amp; Consult, Inc.","og_description":"The court disagreed with the insurer's attempt to limit additional insured status based upon the contract between the parties","og_url":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/insurers-attempt-limit-additional-insured-status-fails\/","og_site_name":"Advise &amp; Consult, Inc.","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Advise-Consult-Inc-126949043996790\/","article_published_time":"2017-12-05T19:30:21+00:00","author":"admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@adviseconsult","twitter_site":"@adviseconsult","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"admin","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/insurers-attempt-limit-additional-insured-status-fails\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/insurers-attempt-limit-additional-insured-status-fails\/"},"author":{"name":"admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/0a11abe008083d5fb19c2b0feefe7bd7"},"headline":"Insurer&#8217;s Attempt to Limit Additional Insured Status Fails","datePublished":"2017-12-05T19:30:21+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/insurers-attempt-limit-additional-insured-status-fails\/"},"wordCount":335,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#organization"},"keywords":["Additional Insured","Advise &amp; Consult"],"articleSection":["Insurance Coverage"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/insurers-attempt-limit-additional-insured-status-fails\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/insurers-attempt-limit-additional-insured-status-fails\/","url":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/insurers-attempt-limit-additional-insured-status-fails\/","name":"Insurer's Attempt to Limit Additional Insured Status Fails - Advise &amp; Consult, Inc.","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2017-12-05T19:30:21+00:00","description":"The court disagreed with the insurer's attempt to limit additional insured status based upon the contract between the parties","inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/insurers-attempt-limit-additional-insured-status-fails\/"]}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/","name":"Advise &amp; Consult, Inc.","description":"Construction Expert Witnesses","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#organization","name":"Advise & Consult","url":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/AC-Red-Logo.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/AC-Red-Logo.png","width":162,"height":75,"caption":"Advise & Consult"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Advise-Consult-Inc-126949043996790\/","https:\/\/x.com\/adviseconsult","https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company-beta\/204526\/","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/user\/MrConstructionExpert"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/0a11abe008083d5fb19c2b0feefe7bd7","name":"admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/b01e71b7acadd7657af782b7ad1a30cc?s=96&d=mm&r=pg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/b01e71b7acadd7657af782b7ad1a30cc?s=96&d=mm&r=pg","caption":"admin"},"sameAs":["http:\/\/www.expertwitnessinconstruction.com"]}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p2ztG6-3Koj","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/893315","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=893315"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/893315\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":893316,"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/893315\/revisions\/893316"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=893315"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=893315"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=893315"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}