{"id":894046,"date":"2018-04-25T14:49:03","date_gmt":"2018-04-25T20:49:03","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/?p=894046"},"modified":"2018-04-25T14:49:03","modified_gmt":"2018-04-25T20:49:03","slug":"faulty-work-constitutes-occurrence","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/faulty-work-constitutes-occurrence\/","title":{"rendered":"Another Appellate Court Holds that Faulty Work Constitutes an Occurrence – This Time Under New York Law"},"content":{"rendered":"

Eric M. Gold | Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP | April 16, 2018<\/p>\n

It is axiomatic that in order to obtain insurance coverage a policyholder must first establish that a claim falls within a policy\u2019s insuring agreement before coverage under the policy is triggered.<\/p>\n

For construction claims brought under CGL policies, that frequently means showing that the damages at issue constitute \u201cproperty damage\u201d caused by an \u201coccurrence\u201d (where \u201coccurrence\u201d is generally defined as \u201can accident\u201d). While this requirement may often seem like a simple factual question, in the context of a subcontractor\u2019s faulty workmanship, the analysis has proven more difficult. Where alleged faulty work causes damage only to the insured\u2019s own work product, is the property damage accidental?<\/p>\n

Over the years, courts across the country have been asked to make this determination, with varying results. The Tenth Circuit\u2019s recent decision in\u00a0Black & Veatch Corp. v. Aspen Insurance (UK) Ltd.<\/a>\u00a0<\/em>adds another federal appellate court decision to the mix and continues a trend finding that faulty subcontractor work constitutes an \u201coccurrence\u201d under standard form CGL language. This case, handled by Pillsbury\u2019s Insurance Recovery and Advisory Group and argued in the Tenth Circuit by Pillsbury Chair David Dekker, is notable because it addresses the issue under New York law\u2014which is sometimes less favorable towards policyholders\u2014and highlights the clear movement of jurisprudence on this issue in the direction of coverage.<\/p>\n

In 2005, the insured entered into contracts \u201cto engineer, procure, and construct several jet bubbling reactors (JBRs), which eliminate contaminants from the exhaust emitted by coal-fired power plants.\u201d The insured subcontracted the engineering and construction of the internal components for at least seven of the JBRs, but deficiencies in the components procured and constructed by the subcontractors allegedly caused the internal components of the JBRs to deform, crack and sometimes collapse, in addition to other damages.<\/p>\n

The standard form CGL policy at issue provided coverage for damages arising from an \u201coccurrence,\u201d which included an accident causing damage to the property of a third party. The policy also contained a \u201cYour Work\u201d exclusion, which barred coverage for property damage to the insured\u2019s own work, and an exception to this exclusion, which preserved coverage for damage attributable to faulty work performed by subcontractors.<\/p>\n

The primary question addressed by the Tenth Circuit panel was whether the New York Court of Appeals, the highest New York court, would hold that the policy\u2019s insuring agreement covered the property damage to the JBRs. In a 2-1 decision, the Tenth Circuit found that coverage applied.<\/p>\n

Relying on previous New York Court of Appeals decisions construing coverage under the same policy language, and the drafting history of these provisions in the CGL policy form, the Court held that the insured did not expect or intend its subcontractors to cause damage, so the damage was accidental. The Court also held that the damage to the JBRs constituted property damage to the owner of the plants, a third party. Rejecting the insurer\u2019s arguments to the contrary, the majority held that any \u201cinterpretation of \u2018occurrence\u2019 as excluding the damages at issue here would render several Policy provisions meaningless, in violation of New York contract interpretation rules.\u201d<\/p>\n

Specifically, the Court found that the \u201cYour Work\u201d exclusion would be \u201credundant\u201d if the definition of \u201coccurrence\u201d \u201ccategorically and preemptively precluded coverage\u201d for damage to the insured general contractor\u2019s own work in the first instance. The Court also held that there would be no reason for the policy to include the subcontractor exception if the basic insuring agreement did not provide coverage for damages to the insured\u2019s work when the damaged work was performed by a subcontractor. To give these provisions meaning, the Court held that an \u201coccurrence\u201d must encompass damage to the insured general contractor\u2019s own work arising from faulty subcontractor workmanship.<\/p>\n

Importantly, the Court also emphasized that its decision followed a trend of state supreme court decisions considering this issue since 2012. These recent decisions reached \u201cnear unanimity\u201d that construction defects can constitute an occurrence. The Tenth Circuit held that it expected the New York Court of Appeals to \u201cjoin the clear trend among state supreme courts holding that damage from faulty subcontractor work constitutes an \u2018occurrence\u2019 under the policy.\u201d<\/p>\n

This case adds to the growing number of jurisdictions finding that a subcontractor\u2019s faulty work constitutes an \u201coccurrence\u201d under standard form CGL language and provides additional authority to policyholders pushing their carriers to obtain coverage for a subcontractors\u2019 faulty work.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Eric M. Gold | Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP | April 16, 2018 It is axiomatic that in order to obtain insurance coverage a policyholder must first establish that a claim falls within a policy\u2019s insuring agreement before coverage under the policy is triggered. For construction claims brought under CGL policies, that frequently means showing… Continue reading Another Appellate Court Holds that Faulty Work Constitutes an Occurrence – This Time Under New York Law<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[30,9914],"tags":[309,9895,271,23,303],"class_list":["post-894046","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-general-liability-policy","category-insurance-coverage","tag-occurrence","tag-advise-consult","tag-cgl-policies","tag-insurance-coverage","tag-new-york","entry"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"yoast_head":"\nAnother Appellate Court Holds that Faulty Work Constitutes an Occurrence - This Time Under New York Law - Advise & Consult, Inc.<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"construction claims brought under CGL policies means showing that the damages at issue constitute \u201cproperty damage\u201d caused by an "occurrence"\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/faulty-work-constitutes-occurrence\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Another Appellate Court Holds that Faulty Work Constitutes an Occurrence - This Time Under New York Law - Advise & Consult, Inc.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"construction claims brought under CGL policies means showing that the damages at issue constitute \u201cproperty damage\u201d caused by an "occurrence"\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/faulty-work-constitutes-occurrence\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Advise & Consult, Inc.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Advise-Consult-Inc-126949043996790\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2018-04-25T20:49:03+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@adviseconsult\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@adviseconsult\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/faulty-work-constitutes-occurrence\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/faulty-work-constitutes-occurrence\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/0a11abe008083d5fb19c2b0feefe7bd7\"},\"headline\":\"Another Appellate Court Holds that Faulty Work Constitutes an Occurrence – This Time Under New York Law\",\"datePublished\":\"2018-04-25T20:49:03+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/faulty-work-constitutes-occurrence\/\"},\"wordCount\":760,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#organization\"},\"keywords\":[\"\\\"Occurrence\\\"\",\"Advise & Consult\",\"CGL Policies\",\"insurance coverage\",\"New York\"],\"articleSection\":[\"General Liability Policy\",\"Insurance Coverage\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/faulty-work-constitutes-occurrence\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/faulty-work-constitutes-occurrence\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/faulty-work-constitutes-occurrence\/\",\"name\":\"Another Appellate Court Holds that Faulty Work Constitutes an Occurrence - This Time Under New York Law - Advise & Consult, Inc.\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2018-04-25T20:49:03+00:00\",\"description\":\"construction claims brought under CGL policies means showing that the damages at issue constitute \u201cproperty damage\u201d caused by an \\\"occurrence\\\"\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/faulty-work-constitutes-occurrence\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"Advise & Consult, Inc.\",\"description\":\"Construction Expert Witnesses\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Advise & Consult\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/AC-Red-Logo.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/AC-Red-Logo.png\",\"width\":162,\"height\":75,\"caption\":\"Advise & Consult\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Advise-Consult-Inc-126949043996790\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/adviseconsult\",\"https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company-beta\/204526\/\",\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/user\/MrConstructionExpert\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/0a11abe008083d5fb19c2b0feefe7bd7\",\"name\":\"admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/b01e71b7acadd7657af782b7ad1a30cc?s=96&d=mm&r=pg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/b01e71b7acadd7657af782b7ad1a30cc?s=96&d=mm&r=pg\",\"caption\":\"admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"http:\/\/www.expertwitnessinconstruction.com\"]}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Another Appellate Court Holds that Faulty Work Constitutes an Occurrence - This Time Under New York Law - Advise & Consult, Inc.","description":"construction claims brought under CGL policies means showing that the damages at issue constitute \u201cproperty damage\u201d caused by an \"occurrence\"","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/faulty-work-constitutes-occurrence\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Another Appellate Court Holds that Faulty Work Constitutes an Occurrence - This Time Under New York Law - Advise & Consult, Inc.","og_description":"construction claims brought under CGL policies means showing that the damages at issue constitute \u201cproperty damage\u201d caused by an \"occurrence\"","og_url":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/faulty-work-constitutes-occurrence\/","og_site_name":"Advise & Consult, Inc.","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Advise-Consult-Inc-126949043996790\/","article_published_time":"2018-04-25T20:49:03+00:00","author":"admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@adviseconsult","twitter_site":"@adviseconsult","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/faulty-work-constitutes-occurrence\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/faulty-work-constitutes-occurrence\/"},"author":{"name":"admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/0a11abe008083d5fb19c2b0feefe7bd7"},"headline":"Another Appellate Court Holds that Faulty Work Constitutes an Occurrence – This Time Under New York Law","datePublished":"2018-04-25T20:49:03+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/faulty-work-constitutes-occurrence\/"},"wordCount":760,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#organization"},"keywords":["\"Occurrence\"","Advise & Consult","CGL Policies","insurance coverage","New York"],"articleSection":["General Liability Policy","Insurance Coverage"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/faulty-work-constitutes-occurrence\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/faulty-work-constitutes-occurrence\/","url":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/faulty-work-constitutes-occurrence\/","name":"Another Appellate Court Holds that Faulty Work Constitutes an Occurrence - This Time Under New York Law - Advise & Consult, Inc.","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2018-04-25T20:49:03+00:00","description":"construction claims brought under CGL policies means showing that the damages at issue constitute \u201cproperty damage\u201d caused by an \"occurrence\"","inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/faulty-work-constitutes-occurrence\/"]}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/","name":"Advise & Consult, Inc.","description":"Construction Expert Witnesses","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#organization","name":"Advise & Consult","url":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/AC-Red-Logo.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/AC-Red-Logo.png","width":162,"height":75,"caption":"Advise & Consult"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Advise-Consult-Inc-126949043996790\/","https:\/\/x.com\/adviseconsult","https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company-beta\/204526\/","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/user\/MrConstructionExpert"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/0a11abe008083d5fb19c2b0feefe7bd7","name":"admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/b01e71b7acadd7657af782b7ad1a30cc?s=96&d=mm&r=pg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/b01e71b7acadd7657af782b7ad1a30cc?s=96&d=mm&r=pg","caption":"admin"},"sameAs":["http:\/\/www.expertwitnessinconstruction.com"]}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p2ztG6-3KA6","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/894046","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=894046"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/894046\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":894047,"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/894046\/revisions\/894047"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=894046"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=894046"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=894046"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}