{"id":895271,"date":"2018-12-05T16:48:22","date_gmt":"2018-12-05T23:48:22","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/?p=895271"},"modified":"2018-12-05T16:48:22","modified_gmt":"2018-12-05T23:48:22","slug":"pollution-exclusion-not-apply-concrete-settling-dust","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/pollution-exclusion-not-apply-concrete-settling-dust\/","title":{"rendered":"Pollution Exclusion Does Not Apply To Concrete Settling Dust"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Tred R. Eyerly | <a href=\"https:\/\/www.insurancelawhawaii.com\/insurance_law_hawaii\/2018\/10\/pollution-exclusion-does-not-apply-to-settling-dust.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Insurance Law Hawaii<\/a> | October 24, 2018<\/p>\n<p>Applying Virginia law, the federal district court determined that the pollution exclusion did not bar coverage.\u00a0Allied Prop. &amp; Cas. Ins. Co. v. Zenith Aviation, Inc., 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14727 (E.D. Va. Aug. 29, 2018).<\/p>\n<p>Zenith Aviation, Inc. hired Abby Construction Company to install an elevator at its warehouse. A wet saw was used to cut away concrete, but Abby did not use any water with the wet saw. This created a significant amount of concrete dust to leave the warehouse. Surrounding businesses contacted the fire department because they thought the dust was smoke from a fire. The concrete dust settled inside Zenith&#8217;s building, damaging airplane parts stored in the warehouse.<\/p>\n<p>Allied issued to Zenith a commercial insurance policy. Zenith submitted a claim for its loss. The policy&#8217;s pollution exclusion barred coverage for the discharge, dispersal, etc. of &#8220;pollutants&#8221; unless the escape of a &#8220;pollutant&#8221; was not &#8220;caused by any of the &#8216;specified causes of loss.'&#8221; But if the discharge . . . of &#8216;pollutants&#8217; results in a &#8216;specified cause of loss,&#8217; we will pay for the loss or damage caused by that &#8216;specified cause of loss.'&#8221; &#8220;Pollutants&#8221; included any irritant or contaminant, including smoke, chemicals and waste. Finally, &#8220;specified causes of loss&#8221; were defined as &#8220;fire; lightening; explosion; windstorm or hail; smoke . . .&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Cross motions for summary judgment were filed. Allied acknowledged that Zenith suffered a &#8220;direct physical loss&#8221; that would be covered but for the pollution exclusion. Allied argued that the concrete dust meet the definition of a &#8220;pollutant&#8221; since it was an &#8220;irritant or contaminant.&#8221; Zenith contended that cement was not a pollutant and Allied had offered nothing to suggest it was.<\/p>\n<p>The court agreed that concrete dust was a pollutant since it could function as both an &#8220;irritant&#8221; and a &#8220;contaminant.&#8221; There was no genuine issue of fact concerning whether the concrete dust &#8220;contaminated&#8221; Zenith&#8217;s products and machinery.<\/p>\n<p>Zenith then argued that the dust was a &#8220;specified cause of loss&#8221; in the form of &#8220;smoke.&#8221; The court found the applicable definition of &#8220;smoke&#8221; as used in the Pollution Exclusion to be unclear, with more than one reasonable definitions. Zenith argued &#8220;smoke&#8221; could mean a cloud of fine particulate matter. Allied submitted that &#8220;smoke&#8221; meant &#8220;the gaseous products of burning materials&#8221; and &#8220;suspension of particles in a gas.&#8221; With two reasonable definitions, the court construed the ambiguity in favor of the insured. &#8220;Smoke&#8221; referred to any visible suspension of particles in a gas, including the concrete dust suspended in the air in Zenith&#8217;s warehouse.<\/p>\n<p>Allied then argued that even if the concrete dust was &#8220;smoke,&#8221; it did not &#8220;cause&#8221; a loss when it merely settled on the airplane parts, contaminating them, because the concrete in the air did not &#8220;result in&#8221; the dust on the inventory and machinery since it was the dust.<\/p>\n<p>The exceptions to the Pollution Exclusion required a causal nexus between a specified cause of loss and the pollutant. The facts reflected: (1) Abby Construction used a wet saw without water to cut concrete; (2) the saw &#8220;released&#8221; concrete solids into the air; (3) the dust, rather than falling immediately to the ground, carried into a cloud of particulate, resulting in &#8220;smoke;&#8221; and (4) the particulate from the cloud of smoke ultimately settled on Zenith&#8217;s products and equipment, contaminating them and causing the loss.<\/p>\n<p>Therefore, Zenith&#8217;s loss resulted from the dispersal or migration of a pollutant onto its inventory and machinery, and that dispersal or migration was caused by a visible gaseous suspension of the concrete particulate in the air, i.e., smoke. The &#8220;dispersal&#8221; or &#8220;migration&#8221; of the concrete dust onto Zenith&#8217;s products was therefore &#8220;itself caused by&#8221; the smoke from which it settled, and therefore the loss fell under the exception to the pollution exclusion. Further, the &#8220;discharge, dispersal, seepage, migration, release or escape&#8221; of the concrete dust from the wet saw &#8220;resulted in&#8221; smoke, a specified cause of loss, which then caused Zenith&#8217;s loss.<\/p>\n<p>Allied argued that &#8220;smoke&#8221; could not simultaneously be both the &#8220;pollutant&#8221; and the &#8220;specified cause of loss.&#8221; But the fact that the particles that contaminated Zenith&#8217;s products and equipment were the same as the particles that were a constituent part of the &#8220;smoke&#8221; did not mean that there was no causal separation between the &#8220;pollutant&#8221; that was dispersed and the &#8220;specified cause of the loss&#8221; that dispersed it or resulted from it.<\/p>\n<p>Therefore, the court believed that the Supreme Court of Virginia would conclude that the Pollution Exclusion did not apply and that there was coverage under the policy for Zenith&#8217;s alleged losses.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Tred R. Eyerly | Insurance Law Hawaii | October 24, 2018 Applying Virginia law, the federal district court determined that the pollution exclusion did not bar coverage.\u00a0Allied Prop. &amp; Cas. Ins. Co. v. Zenith Aviation, Inc., 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14727 (E.D. Va. Aug. 29, 2018). Zenith Aviation, Inc. hired Abby Construction Company to install&hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/pollution-exclusion-not-apply-concrete-settling-dust\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Pollution Exclusion Does Not Apply To Concrete Settling Dust<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[3],"tags":[9895,23,530],"class_list":["post-895271","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-insurance-claims","tag-advise-consult","tag-insurance-coverage","tag-pollution-exclusion","entry"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v25.0 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Pollution Exclusion Does Not Apply To Concrete Settling Dust - Advise &amp; Consult, Inc.<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Therefore, the court believed that the Supreme Court of Virginia would conclude that the Pollution Exclusion did not apply and that there was coverage\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/pollution-exclusion-not-apply-concrete-settling-dust\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Pollution Exclusion Does Not Apply To Concrete Settling Dust - Advise &amp; Consult, Inc.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Therefore, the court believed that the Supreme Court of Virginia would conclude that the Pollution Exclusion did not apply and that there was coverage\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/pollution-exclusion-not-apply-concrete-settling-dust\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Advise &amp; Consult, Inc.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Advise-Consult-Inc-126949043996790\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2018-12-05T23:48:22+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@adviseconsult\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@adviseconsult\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/pollution-exclusion-not-apply-concrete-settling-dust\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/pollution-exclusion-not-apply-concrete-settling-dust\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/0a11abe008083d5fb19c2b0feefe7bd7\"},\"headline\":\"Pollution Exclusion Does Not Apply To Concrete Settling Dust\",\"datePublished\":\"2018-12-05T23:48:22+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/pollution-exclusion-not-apply-concrete-settling-dust\/\"},\"wordCount\":773,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#organization\"},\"keywords\":[\"Advise &amp; Consult\",\"insurance coverage\",\"Pollution Exclusion\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Insurance Claims\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/pollution-exclusion-not-apply-concrete-settling-dust\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/pollution-exclusion-not-apply-concrete-settling-dust\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/pollution-exclusion-not-apply-concrete-settling-dust\/\",\"name\":\"Pollution Exclusion Does Not Apply To Concrete Settling Dust - Advise &amp; Consult, Inc.\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2018-12-05T23:48:22+00:00\",\"description\":\"Therefore, the court believed that the Supreme Court of Virginia would conclude that the Pollution Exclusion did not apply and that there was coverage\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/pollution-exclusion-not-apply-concrete-settling-dust\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"Advise &amp; Consult, Inc.\",\"description\":\"Construction Expert Witnesses\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Advise & Consult\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/AC-Red-Logo.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/AC-Red-Logo.png\",\"width\":162,\"height\":75,\"caption\":\"Advise & Consult\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Advise-Consult-Inc-126949043996790\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/adviseconsult\",\"https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company-beta\/204526\/\",\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/user\/MrConstructionExpert\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/0a11abe008083d5fb19c2b0feefe7bd7\",\"name\":\"admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/b01e71b7acadd7657af782b7ad1a30cc?s=96&d=mm&r=pg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/b01e71b7acadd7657af782b7ad1a30cc?s=96&d=mm&r=pg\",\"caption\":\"admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"http:\/\/www.expertwitnessinconstruction.com\"]}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Pollution Exclusion Does Not Apply To Concrete Settling Dust - Advise &amp; Consult, Inc.","description":"Therefore, the court believed that the Supreme Court of Virginia would conclude that the Pollution Exclusion did not apply and that there was coverage","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/pollution-exclusion-not-apply-concrete-settling-dust\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Pollution Exclusion Does Not Apply To Concrete Settling Dust - Advise &amp; Consult, Inc.","og_description":"Therefore, the court believed that the Supreme Court of Virginia would conclude that the Pollution Exclusion did not apply and that there was coverage","og_url":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/pollution-exclusion-not-apply-concrete-settling-dust\/","og_site_name":"Advise &amp; Consult, Inc.","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Advise-Consult-Inc-126949043996790\/","article_published_time":"2018-12-05T23:48:22+00:00","author":"admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@adviseconsult","twitter_site":"@adviseconsult","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/pollution-exclusion-not-apply-concrete-settling-dust\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/pollution-exclusion-not-apply-concrete-settling-dust\/"},"author":{"name":"admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/0a11abe008083d5fb19c2b0feefe7bd7"},"headline":"Pollution Exclusion Does Not Apply To Concrete Settling Dust","datePublished":"2018-12-05T23:48:22+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/pollution-exclusion-not-apply-concrete-settling-dust\/"},"wordCount":773,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#organization"},"keywords":["Advise &amp; Consult","insurance coverage","Pollution Exclusion"],"articleSection":["Insurance Claims"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/pollution-exclusion-not-apply-concrete-settling-dust\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/pollution-exclusion-not-apply-concrete-settling-dust\/","url":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/pollution-exclusion-not-apply-concrete-settling-dust\/","name":"Pollution Exclusion Does Not Apply To Concrete Settling Dust - Advise &amp; Consult, Inc.","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2018-12-05T23:48:22+00:00","description":"Therefore, the court believed that the Supreme Court of Virginia would conclude that the Pollution Exclusion did not apply and that there was coverage","inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/pollution-exclusion-not-apply-concrete-settling-dust\/"]}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/","name":"Advise &amp; Consult, Inc.","description":"Construction Expert Witnesses","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#organization","name":"Advise & Consult","url":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/AC-Red-Logo.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/AC-Red-Logo.png","width":162,"height":75,"caption":"Advise & Consult"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Advise-Consult-Inc-126949043996790\/","https:\/\/x.com\/adviseconsult","https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company-beta\/204526\/","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/user\/MrConstructionExpert"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/0a11abe008083d5fb19c2b0feefe7bd7","name":"admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/b01e71b7acadd7657af782b7ad1a30cc?s=96&d=mm&r=pg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/b01e71b7acadd7657af782b7ad1a30cc?s=96&d=mm&r=pg","caption":"admin"},"sameAs":["http:\/\/www.expertwitnessinconstruction.com"]}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p2ztG6-3KTR","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/895271","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=895271"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/895271\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":895272,"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/895271\/revisions\/895272"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=895271"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=895271"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=895271"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}