{"id":895406,"date":"2019-01-10T15:37:25","date_gmt":"2019-01-10T22:37:25","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/?p=895406"},"modified":"2019-01-10T15:37:33","modified_gmt":"2019-01-10T22:37:33","slug":"labor-code-administrative-dispute","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/labor-code-administrative-dispute\/","title":{"rendered":"Naughty or Nice. Contractor Receives Two Lumps of Coal in Administrative Dispute"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>Garret Murai | <a href=\"https:\/\/calconstructionlawblog.com\/2019\/01\/07\/naughty-or-nice-contractor-receives-two-lumps-of-coal-in-administrative-dispute\/\">California Construction Law Blog<\/a> | January 7, 2019<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>So, how were your holidays? Hopefully you were good and didn\u2019t receive a lump of coal from Santa. For one contractor, 2018, wasn\u2019t such a good year. And as its name, Black Diamond, suggests, it did indeed receive a black diamond from the courts. Actually, two of them.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><em>Contractors\u2019 State License Board v. Superior Court<\/em>&nbsp;(Black Diamond No. 1)<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>In&nbsp;<em><a href=\"https:\/\/scholar.google.com\/scholar_case?case=5857804473613315297&amp;q=Black+diamond+Electrical&amp;hl=en&amp;as_sdt=4,5\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Contractors\u2019 State License Board v. Superior Court<\/a>,&nbsp;<\/em>Court of Appeals for the First District, Case No. 1154476 (October 11, 2018), the Contractors State License Board (\u201cCSLB\u201d) brought disciplinary proceedings against Black Diamond Electric, Inc. (\u201cBlack Diamond\u201d), a C-10 Electrical Contractor, for violating: (1) Labor Code section 108.2, which requires individuals performing work as electricians to be certified; and (2) Labor Code section 108.4, which permits uncertified persons seeking on-the-job experience to perform electrical work so long as they are under the direct supervision of a certified electrician.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The CSLB filed an accusation against Black Diamond in March 2017. In response, Black Diamond filed a \u201cNotice of Defense\u201d claiming that \u201cthe work its employees were performing required neither certification nor supervision\u201d and that the CSLB\u2019s interpretation of the applicable Labor Code sections were erroneous. In its request for relief, Black Diamond sought a \u201cpermanent injunction barring any disciplinary action for violation of Labor Code sections 108 et seq.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In April 2018, an administrative law judge heard the accusation and found that Black Diamond had violated the Labor Code by having individuals perform electrical work without certification or direct supervision by a certified electrician and recommended revocation of Black Diamond\u2019s contractor\u2019s license. The CSLB Registrar adopted the proposed decision, but before the decision became effective, Black Diamond asked the CSLB to stay entry of the decision so it could file a motion for reconsideration. The CSLB granted the request.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Meanwhile, while the administrative proceeding was pending, Black Diamond filed a complaint in the Contra Costa County Superior against the CSLB seeking a declaration that the CSLB was \u201cknowingly enforcing Labor Code&nbsp;\u00a7 108, et seq. illegally\u201d and seeking a \u201cpermanent injunction enjoining and restraining the [CSLB] from seeking to enforce the \u2018direct supervision\u2019 provision&nbsp;of Labor Code section 108.4(a)(3) until the [State Legislature] provides the [CSLB] with further clarification.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In response, the CSLB filed a demurrer to the complaint arguing that the Superior Court lacked jurisdiction because Black Diamond had not yet exhausted its administrative remedies in the parallel administrative proceeding. The trial court overruled the demurrer on the ground that Black Diamond\u2019s complaint for declaratory relief was \u201cnot limited to the pending administrative proceeding, but is based on the [CSLB\u2019s] interpretation of [Labor Code] section 108 and how the [CSLB] will apply its interpretation to [Black Diamond] going forward.\u201d The CSLB appealed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>On appeal, the First District Court of Appeal overturned the decision of the trial court finding that the Administrative Procedure Act permitted Black Diamond to object to an accusation not the ground that it \u201cdoes not state acts or omissions upon which the agency may proceed\u201d and to \u201c[o]bject to the form of the accusation . . . on the ground that it so indefinite or uncertain that the respondent cannot identify the transaction or prepare a defense.\u201d The Court of Appeal also noted that the Administrative Procedure Act allows Black Diamond to conduct discovery and to move to compel discovery if necessary.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>As such, held the Court of Appeal, \u201c[s]ince the relevant statutes provide [Black Diamond] with an administrative remedy, it must first exhaust that remedy before it may seek redress in court.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Lump of coal number one.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><em>Contractors\u2019 State License Board v. Superior Court<\/em>&nbsp;(Black Diamond No. 2)<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>In&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/scholar.google.com\/scholar_case?case=14663611093997448090&amp;q=Contractors+state+License+Board&amp;hl=en&amp;as_sdt=4,5&amp;as_ylo=2018\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\"><em>Contractors\u2019 State License Board v. Superior Court<\/em><\/a>&nbsp;(2018) 23 Cal.App.5th 125, while Black Diamond\u2019s action with the Contra Costa County Superior Court was pending, Black Diamond served interrogatories and a request for production of documents on the CSLB and noticed the deposition of David R. Fogt, the Registrar of the CSLB.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In response, the CSLB filed a motion for protective order to prevent deposition, arguing that: (1) the deposition was improper before the court heard the CSLB\u2019s demurrer; (2) the deposition was noticed for the purpose of harassing Mr. Fogt and was burdensome because the deposition sought to depose Mr. Fogt on the definition of statutory terms, which are issues of law, not fact; and (3) the deposition notice was improper because top government executives are normally not subject to deposition.&nbsp;In opposition to the motion, Black Diamond argued that it\u2019s deposition notice was permissible.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In February 2018, the trial court issued a tentative ruling denying the CSLB\u2019s motion for protective order finding that Mr. Fogt \u201chas direct factual information and that he was directly involved in issues related to this case before his appointment as Executive Officer.\u201d The CSLB appealed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>On appeal, the First District Court of Appeal noted that \u201c[t]he general rule in California and federal court is that agency heads and other top governmental executives are not subject to deposition absent compelling reasons\u201d unless: (1) \u201cthe deposing party . . . show[s] that the government official \u2018has direct personal&nbsp;<em>factual<\/em>&nbsp;information pertaining to material issues in the action . . . \u201d (emphasis in original); and (2) \u201cthe deposing party &nbsp;. . . also show[s] \u201cthe information to be gained from the deposition is not available through any other source.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In response to Black Diamond\u2019s argument that it was not seeking to depose Mr. Fogt in his executive capacity, but rather, was seeking &nbsp;information that Mr. Fogt had gained during his earlier career with the CSLB, the Court of Appeals held that \u201c[I]t does not matter that [Black Diamond] claims to seek information Fogt gained before he was elevated to his current position. The rule prohibiting the deposition of agency heads and other highly placed public officials is grounded on the concern that such proceedings will consume the officials\u2019 time and hamper them in the conduct of government business.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Further, held the Court of Appeal, Black Diamond\u2019s purported purpose of deposing Mr. Fogt \u201cto inquire about the CSLB\u2019s] prior administrative interpretations fo the statute, and prior applications to it, that occurred by his direction, through his authority since his appointment as Enforcement Chief,\u201d sought information on issues of law alone, thereby&nbsp;precluding his deposition, not facts. \u201cThe only information relevant to the [CSLB\u2019s] interpretation of the Labor Code will be the text of the statutes, legislative history, and perhaps official administrative interpretations,\u201d explained the Court, and \u201c[Black Diamond] is not permitted to ask agency officials how they personally interpret statutes administered by the [CSLB], since their personal views are irrelevant to the purely legal issue of statutory construction.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Lump of coal number two.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Garret Murai | California Construction Law Blog | January 7, 2019 So, how were your holidays? Hopefully you were good and didn\u2019t receive a lump of coal from Santa. For one contractor, 2018, wasn\u2019t such a good year. And as its name, Black Diamond, suggests, it did indeed receive a black diamond from the courts.&hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/labor-code-administrative-dispute\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Naughty or Nice. Contractor Receives Two Lumps of Coal in Administrative Dispute<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[14],"tags":[9895,88,10711],"class_list":["post-895406","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-construction-2","tag-advise-consult","tag-california","tag-labor-code","entry"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v25.0 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Naughty or Nice. Contractor Receives Two Lumps of Coal in Administrative Dispute - Advise &amp; Consult, Inc.<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Contractors State License Board brought disciplinary proceedings against Black Diamond Electric, Inc., for violating Labor Code 108.2 and 108.4\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/labor-code-administrative-dispute\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Naughty or Nice. Contractor Receives Two Lumps of Coal in Administrative Dispute - Advise &amp; Consult, Inc.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Contractors State License Board brought disciplinary proceedings against Black Diamond Electric, Inc., for violating Labor Code 108.2 and 108.4\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/labor-code-administrative-dispute\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Advise &amp; Consult, Inc.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Advise-Consult-Inc-126949043996790\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-01-10T22:37:25+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-01-10T22:37:33+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@adviseconsult\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@adviseconsult\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/labor-code-administrative-dispute\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/labor-code-administrative-dispute\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/0a11abe008083d5fb19c2b0feefe7bd7\"},\"headline\":\"Naughty or Nice. Contractor Receives Two Lumps of Coal in Administrative Dispute\",\"datePublished\":\"2019-01-10T22:37:25+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-01-10T22:37:33+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/labor-code-administrative-dispute\/\"},\"wordCount\":1126,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#organization\"},\"keywords\":[\"Advise &amp; Consult\",\"california\",\"Labor Code\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Construction\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/labor-code-administrative-dispute\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/labor-code-administrative-dispute\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/labor-code-administrative-dispute\/\",\"name\":\"Naughty or Nice. Contractor Receives Two Lumps of Coal in Administrative Dispute - Advise &amp; Consult, Inc.\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2019-01-10T22:37:25+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-01-10T22:37:33+00:00\",\"description\":\"Contractors State License Board brought disciplinary proceedings against Black Diamond Electric, Inc., for violating Labor Code 108.2 and 108.4\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/labor-code-administrative-dispute\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"Advise &amp; Consult, Inc.\",\"description\":\"Construction Expert Witnesses\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Advise & Consult\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/AC-Red-Logo.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/AC-Red-Logo.png\",\"width\":162,\"height\":75,\"caption\":\"Advise & Consult\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Advise-Consult-Inc-126949043996790\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/adviseconsult\",\"https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company-beta\/204526\/\",\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/user\/MrConstructionExpert\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/0a11abe008083d5fb19c2b0feefe7bd7\",\"name\":\"admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/b01e71b7acadd7657af782b7ad1a30cc?s=96&d=mm&r=pg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/b01e71b7acadd7657af782b7ad1a30cc?s=96&d=mm&r=pg\",\"caption\":\"admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"http:\/\/www.expertwitnessinconstruction.com\"]}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Naughty or Nice. Contractor Receives Two Lumps of Coal in Administrative Dispute - Advise &amp; Consult, Inc.","description":"Contractors State License Board brought disciplinary proceedings against Black Diamond Electric, Inc., for violating Labor Code 108.2 and 108.4","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/labor-code-administrative-dispute\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Naughty or Nice. Contractor Receives Two Lumps of Coal in Administrative Dispute - Advise &amp; Consult, Inc.","og_description":"Contractors State License Board brought disciplinary proceedings against Black Diamond Electric, Inc., for violating Labor Code 108.2 and 108.4","og_url":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/labor-code-administrative-dispute\/","og_site_name":"Advise &amp; Consult, Inc.","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Advise-Consult-Inc-126949043996790\/","article_published_time":"2019-01-10T22:37:25+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-01-10T22:37:33+00:00","author":"admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@adviseconsult","twitter_site":"@adviseconsult","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/labor-code-administrative-dispute\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/labor-code-administrative-dispute\/"},"author":{"name":"admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/0a11abe008083d5fb19c2b0feefe7bd7"},"headline":"Naughty or Nice. Contractor Receives Two Lumps of Coal in Administrative Dispute","datePublished":"2019-01-10T22:37:25+00:00","dateModified":"2019-01-10T22:37:33+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/labor-code-administrative-dispute\/"},"wordCount":1126,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#organization"},"keywords":["Advise &amp; Consult","california","Labor Code"],"articleSection":["Construction"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/labor-code-administrative-dispute\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/labor-code-administrative-dispute\/","url":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/labor-code-administrative-dispute\/","name":"Naughty or Nice. Contractor Receives Two Lumps of Coal in Administrative Dispute - Advise &amp; Consult, Inc.","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2019-01-10T22:37:25+00:00","dateModified":"2019-01-10T22:37:33+00:00","description":"Contractors State License Board brought disciplinary proceedings against Black Diamond Electric, Inc., for violating Labor Code 108.2 and 108.4","inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/labor-code-administrative-dispute\/"]}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/","name":"Advise &amp; Consult, Inc.","description":"Construction Expert Witnesses","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#organization","name":"Advise & Consult","url":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/AC-Red-Logo.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/AC-Red-Logo.png","width":162,"height":75,"caption":"Advise & Consult"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Advise-Consult-Inc-126949043996790\/","https:\/\/x.com\/adviseconsult","https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company-beta\/204526\/","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/user\/MrConstructionExpert"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/0a11abe008083d5fb19c2b0feefe7bd7","name":"admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/b01e71b7acadd7657af782b7ad1a30cc?s=96&d=mm&r=pg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/b01e71b7acadd7657af782b7ad1a30cc?s=96&d=mm&r=pg","caption":"admin"},"sameAs":["http:\/\/www.expertwitnessinconstruction.com"]}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p2ztG6-3KW2","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/895406","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=895406"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/895406\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":895407,"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/895406\/revisions\/895407"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=895406"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=895406"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=895406"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}