{"id":895443,"date":"2019-01-23T14:33:36","date_gmt":"2019-01-23T21:33:36","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/?p=895443"},"modified":"2019-01-23T14:33:44","modified_gmt":"2019-01-23T21:33:44","slug":"recurring-asbestos-coverage-issues","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/recurring-asbestos-coverage-issues\/","title":{"rendered":"Pennsylvania Federal Court Addresses Recurring Asbestos Coverage Issues"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

Craig O’Neill and Laura Rossi | Complex Insurance Coverage Reporter<\/a> | January 18, 2019<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In a pair of recent asbestos coverage decisions, a Pennsylvania federal court issued rulings addressing expedited funding orders, number of \u201coccurrences,\u201d and the applicability of aggregate limits under the Fourth Circuit\u2019s Wallace & Gale approach.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Zurn Industries, LLC v. Allstate Insurance Company, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 197481 (W.D. Pa. Nov. 20, 2018)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Policyholder Zurn, a manufacturer and distributor of boilers, was named as a defendant in thousands of underlying asbestos-related bodily injury suits. After its primary insurers claimed exhaustion, Zurn moved on an expedited basis to require two of its excess insurers to each assume fifty percent of its defense and indemnity costs until they reached a permanent cost-sharing agreement. In denying Zurn\u2019s expedited request for interim funding, the court held that the record was insufficient \u201cin the opening stages of litigation, before discovery has occurred\u201d to determine whether the underlying coverage had been properly exhausted but left the door open for Zurn to refile its motion on a more developed record.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Relying on J.H. France and Koppers, Zurn argued that it had properly \u201cselected\u201d the excess insurers\u2019 policies and, therefore, they were obligated to share its defense and indemnity costs subject only to their right \u201cto redistribute the burden among themselves.\u201d Zurn also argued that, under Pennsylvania\u2019s \u201cfour corners\u201d rule, it only needed to make a prima facie showing that the underlying asbestos claims fell within the scope of coverage based on proof of exhaustion from a prior insurer. Zurn\u2019s excess insurer countered that the relief sought was premature due to a dispute over the accuracy of the primary insurer\u2019s representations concerning exhaustion that must be resolved following discovery and motion practice.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The district court noted that \u201cextenuating circumstances\u201d complicated the application of the usual \u201cfour corners\u201d rule because the case involved (1) thousands of underlying asbestos claims rather than a single claim; and (2) excess insurance coverage, meaning that the policyholder must also establish that the insurer\u2019s policies were triggered by the exhaustion of underlying coverage. The court further observed that exhaustion is \u201cinherently a factual issue, and the record before the Court [was] both limited and underdeveloped.\u201d Ultimately, the court concluded that it was premature to make any determination concerning exhaustion since the insurer who provided representations of exhaustion had yet to answer the complaint or file cross-claims against it. As the court explained:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

To the extent that Zurn cites [cases] for the proposition that it has satisfied its prima facie evidentiary burden by supplying loss runs, . . . does not necessarily mean that the Court can or should determine whether that burden has been met in the opening stages of litigation, before discovery has occurred\u2026. Notably, none of the cases cited by [Zurn] involved the type of interim relief being sought here in the opening stage of litigation, and this Court has been unable to find any Pennsylvania case in which such relief has been requested or granted at the outset (emphasis added).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The court therefore denied Zurn\u2019s motion without prejudice. Because the court deemed Zurn\u2019s defense of thousands of asbestos lawsuits a \u201cserious matter that deserve[d] prompt attention,\u201d it directed the parties to confer and submit a proposal for expedited discovery on the issue of exhaustion.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Ohio Valley Insulating Company, Inc. v. Maryland Casualty Company, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 216393 (W.D. Pa. Dec. 27, 2018)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Policyholder Ohio Valley Insulating Company (OVI), an installer of steam pipes and boiler insulation, brought a coverage action against its insurer in a dispute over numerous asbestos bodily injury claims. The district court held on summary judgment that (1) each site where the insured conducted operations was a separate \u201coccurrence\u201d; and (2) the aggregate limits of the \u201ccompleted operations\u201d hazard applied.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

First, the district court considered whether the claims brought against OVI were one or multiple occurrences. The policies at issue provided that \u201call bodily injury . . . arising out of continuous or repeated exposure to substantially the same general conditions shall be considered as arising out of one occurrence.\u201d The court was persuaded by Kvaerner v. OneBeacon, 74 Pa. D. & C.4th 32 (Pa. Ct. Com. Pl. Phila. Cty. 2005), which held that each construction site where the insured used asbestos constituted a separate \u201coccurrence\u201d because \u201cthe claimants that were exposed to asbestos at the same location and at the same time were exposed to substantially the same general condition.\u201d The court distinguished between products and operations claims and concluded that the activities that \u201ctriggered the underlying claims did not arise from a single, negligent practice that could be considered one cause such as distributing a uniformly defective product from a single manufacturer or selling a product containing asbestos from one location.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In following Kvaerner, the court emphasized that (1) the policies restricted coverage to OVI\u2019s specified operations\u2014i.e., \u201cSteam Pipe or Boiler Insulation\u201d\u2014at various sites; (2) the policies provided coverage for \u201ccompleted operations\u201d hazards but were silent on \u201cproducts\u201d hazards coverage; (3) the asbestos suits derived from multiple contract, operations, and job sites; and (4) the insurers\u2019 determination of OVI\u2019s liability in the asbestos suits was based on a \u201ccontract book\u201d match, i.e., whether a particular claimant\u2019s work history coincides with the list of OVI\u2019s contemporaneously recorded operations. According to the court, these facts \u201cdemonstrate[d] that claimants in the Asbestos Suits who were exposed to asbestos during the same time and at the same site where OVI was conducting one of its operations were subjected to continuous or repeated exposure to substantially the same general condition.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Second, the court rejected OVI\u2019s contention that the asbestos suits fell solely within the policies\u2019 \u201coperations\u201d coverage. Instead, the court followed the rule announced by the Fourth Circuit Court in In re Wallace & Gale Co., 385 F.3d 820, 830 (4th Cir. 2004) (establishing that \u201cwhere the injury that triggers coverage occurs subsequent to exposure to an operation, that claim is subject to the aggregate limits of the \u2018completed operations\u2019 hazard\u201d which \u201cencompass any bodily injury claim in which the claimant was injured by asbestos exposure attributable to an operation that the insured completed prior to the start of the policy period.\u201d). The court found that the approach in Wallace & Gale \u201ccomports with Pennsylvania \u2018trigger\u2019 theory of coverage in asbestos cases\u201d\u2014specifically noting that, under J.H. France, a claimant\u2019s exposure to asbestos, as well as all phases of an ensuing disease, independently \u201ctrigger\u201d coverage. Thus, the court concluded that multiple policies were triggered and \u201cthe aggregate limits associated with the \u2018completed operations\u2019 hazard [were] applicable.\u201d<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Craig O’Neill and Laura Rossi | Complex Insurance Coverage Reporter | January 18, 2019 In a pair of recent asbestos coverage decisions, a Pennsylvania federal court issued rulings addressing expedited funding orders, number of \u201coccurrences,\u201d and the applicability of aggregate limits under the Fourth Circuit\u2019s Wallace & Gale approach. Zurn Industries, LLC v. Allstate Insurance… Continue reading Pennsylvania Federal Court Addresses Recurring Asbestos Coverage Issues<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[8782],"tags":[9895,34,361],"class_list":["post-895443","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-personal-injury","tag-advise-consult","tag-asbestos","tag-personal-injury","entry"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"yoast_head":"\nPennsylvania Federal Court Addresses Recurring Asbestos Coverage Issues - Advise & Consult, Inc.<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"In a pair of recent asbestos coverage decisions, a Pennsylvania federal court issued rulings addressing expedited funding orders, number of \u201coccurrences,\u201d\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/recurring-asbestos-coverage-issues\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Pennsylvania Federal Court Addresses Recurring Asbestos Coverage Issues - Advise & Consult, Inc.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"In a pair of recent asbestos coverage decisions, a Pennsylvania federal court issued rulings addressing expedited funding orders, number of \u201coccurrences,\u201d\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/recurring-asbestos-coverage-issues\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Advise & Consult, Inc.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Advise-Consult-Inc-126949043996790\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-01-23T21:33:36+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-01-23T21:33:44+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@adviseconsult\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@adviseconsult\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/recurring-asbestos-coverage-issues\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/recurring-asbestos-coverage-issues\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/0a11abe008083d5fb19c2b0feefe7bd7\"},\"headline\":\"Pennsylvania Federal Court Addresses Recurring Asbestos Coverage Issues\",\"datePublished\":\"2019-01-23T21:33:36+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-01-23T21:33:44+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/recurring-asbestos-coverage-issues\/\"},\"wordCount\":1093,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#organization\"},\"keywords\":[\"Advise & Consult\",\"asbestos\",\"Personal Injury\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Personal Injury\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/recurring-asbestos-coverage-issues\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/recurring-asbestos-coverage-issues\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/recurring-asbestos-coverage-issues\/\",\"name\":\"Pennsylvania Federal Court Addresses Recurring Asbestos Coverage Issues - Advise & Consult, Inc.\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2019-01-23T21:33:36+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-01-23T21:33:44+00:00\",\"description\":\"In a pair of recent asbestos coverage decisions, a Pennsylvania federal court issued rulings addressing expedited funding orders, number of \u201coccurrences,\u201d\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/recurring-asbestos-coverage-issues\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"Advise & Consult, Inc.\",\"description\":\"Construction Expert Witnesses\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Advise & Consult\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/AC-Red-Logo.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/AC-Red-Logo.png\",\"width\":162,\"height\":75,\"caption\":\"Advise & Consult\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Advise-Consult-Inc-126949043996790\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/adviseconsult\",\"https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company-beta\/204526\/\",\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/user\/MrConstructionExpert\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/0a11abe008083d5fb19c2b0feefe7bd7\",\"name\":\"admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/b01e71b7acadd7657af782b7ad1a30cc?s=96&d=mm&r=pg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/b01e71b7acadd7657af782b7ad1a30cc?s=96&d=mm&r=pg\",\"caption\":\"admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"http:\/\/www.expertwitnessinconstruction.com\"]}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Pennsylvania Federal Court Addresses Recurring Asbestos Coverage Issues - Advise & Consult, Inc.","description":"In a pair of recent asbestos coverage decisions, a Pennsylvania federal court issued rulings addressing expedited funding orders, number of \u201coccurrences,\u201d","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/recurring-asbestos-coverage-issues\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Pennsylvania Federal Court Addresses Recurring Asbestos Coverage Issues - Advise & Consult, Inc.","og_description":"In a pair of recent asbestos coverage decisions, a Pennsylvania federal court issued rulings addressing expedited funding orders, number of \u201coccurrences,\u201d","og_url":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/recurring-asbestos-coverage-issues\/","og_site_name":"Advise & Consult, Inc.","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Advise-Consult-Inc-126949043996790\/","article_published_time":"2019-01-23T21:33:36+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-01-23T21:33:44+00:00","author":"admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@adviseconsult","twitter_site":"@adviseconsult","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/recurring-asbestos-coverage-issues\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/recurring-asbestos-coverage-issues\/"},"author":{"name":"admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/0a11abe008083d5fb19c2b0feefe7bd7"},"headline":"Pennsylvania Federal Court Addresses Recurring Asbestos Coverage Issues","datePublished":"2019-01-23T21:33:36+00:00","dateModified":"2019-01-23T21:33:44+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/recurring-asbestos-coverage-issues\/"},"wordCount":1093,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#organization"},"keywords":["Advise & Consult","asbestos","Personal Injury"],"articleSection":["Personal Injury"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/recurring-asbestos-coverage-issues\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/recurring-asbestos-coverage-issues\/","url":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/recurring-asbestos-coverage-issues\/","name":"Pennsylvania Federal Court Addresses Recurring Asbestos Coverage Issues - Advise & Consult, Inc.","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2019-01-23T21:33:36+00:00","dateModified":"2019-01-23T21:33:44+00:00","description":"In a pair of recent asbestos coverage decisions, a Pennsylvania federal court issued rulings addressing expedited funding orders, number of \u201coccurrences,\u201d","inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/recurring-asbestos-coverage-issues\/"]}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/","name":"Advise & Consult, Inc.","description":"Construction Expert Witnesses","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#organization","name":"Advise & Consult","url":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/AC-Red-Logo.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/AC-Red-Logo.png","width":162,"height":75,"caption":"Advise & Consult"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Advise-Consult-Inc-126949043996790\/","https:\/\/x.com\/adviseconsult","https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company-beta\/204526\/","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/user\/MrConstructionExpert"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/0a11abe008083d5fb19c2b0feefe7bd7","name":"admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/b01e71b7acadd7657af782b7ad1a30cc?s=96&d=mm&r=pg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/b01e71b7acadd7657af782b7ad1a30cc?s=96&d=mm&r=pg","caption":"admin"},"sameAs":["http:\/\/www.expertwitnessinconstruction.com"]}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p2ztG6-3KWD","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/895443","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=895443"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/895443\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":895444,"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/895443\/revisions\/895444"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=895443"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=895443"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=895443"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}