{"id":895464,"date":"2019-01-30T11:54:46","date_gmt":"2019-01-30T18:54:46","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/?p=895464"},"modified":"2019-01-30T12:16:55","modified_gmt":"2019-01-30T19:16:55","slug":"developers-failure-plead-amount-of-damages-cross-complaint-fatal-to-direct-action","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/developers-failure-plead-amount-of-damages-cross-complaint-fatal-to-direct-action\/","title":{"rendered":"Developer\u2019s Failure to Plead Amount of Damages in Cross-Complaint Fatal to Direct Action Against Subcontractor\u2019s Insurers Based on Default Judgment"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>Christopher Kendrick and Valerie A. Moore | <a href=\"https:\/\/www.hbblaw.com\/Developers-Failure-to-Plead-Amount-of-Damages-in-Cross-Complaint-Fatal-to-Direct-Action-Against-Subcontractors-Insurers-Based-on-Default-Judgment-01-07-2019\/\">Haight Brown and Bonesteel LLP<\/a> | January 7, 2019<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In&nbsp;<em>Yu v. Liberty Surplus Ins. Corp.<\/em>&nbsp;(No. G054522, filed 12\/11\/18), a California appeals court held that a developer\u2019s failure to allege the amounts of damages sought in its cross-complaint rendered default judgments against a subcontractor void and, therefore, unenforceable against the subcontractor\u2019s insurers in a direct action under Insurance Code section 11580(b)(2).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Yu, the owner, hired ATMI to develop a hotel. ATMI subcontracted with Fitch to perform stucco and paint work. Yu sued ATMI for construction defects and the developer cross-complained against its subcontractors, including Fitch, for breach of contract; warranty; indemnity, etc. Yu\u2019s operative complaint prayed for damages \u201cin an amount not less than $10,000,000, according to proof.\u201d ATMI\u2019s cross-complaint stated that it incorporated the allegations of Yu\u2019s complaint \u201cfor identification and informational purposes only,\u201d but \u201cdoes not admit the truth of any allegations contained therein.\u201d The cross-complaint also prayed for damages with respect to the various causes of action \u201cin an amount according to proof.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Fitch defaulted. ATMI then settled with Yu, including an assignment of rights against Fitch. Yu proceeded to prove up a default judgment against Fitch for $1.2 million, which was entered by the court.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Fitch\u2019s insurers moved to vacate the judgment, arguing that ATMI had not stated an amount of damages in the cross-complaint sufficient to support a default judgment. That motion was denied on the ground that the insurers lacked standing to contest the validity of the default judgment. In an unpublished opinion the appeals court affirmed, while telling the insurers that they had an alternative remedy of denying any demand for payment and litigating the issue in a coverage action.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Yu then sued the insurers as a judgment creditor in a direct action under Insurance Code section 11580(b)(2). But the court in that action entered summary judgment for the insurers, ruling that the default judgment was void on its face because of the absence of a money demand in the cross-complaint.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The appeals court agreed. The court first pointed out that under Code of Civil Procedure section 425.10(a) in any complaint or cross-complaint \u201c[i]f the recovery of money or damages is demanded, the amount demanded shall be stated.\u201d The court cited exceptions to the general rule in cases involving personal injury or wrongful death, or when the plaintiff is seeking punitive damages. (Citing Code Civ. Proc., \u00a7\u00a7 425.10(b); 425.11.) And in those cases, the plaintiff must still serve a separate written statement of damages (citing Code Civ. Proc., \u00a7\u00a7 425.11 (compensatory damages), and 425.115 (punitive damages), before a default judgment may be taken. (Code Civ. Proc., \u00a7425.11(c).)<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The&nbsp;<em>Yu<\/em>&nbsp;court explained that it is a matter of due process that the defendant must have notice of the specific relief sought, so that he or she can decide whether to appear and defend. Further, the Legislature has provided that a default judgment cannot exceed the amount demanded, or it is void. (Code Civ. Proc., \u00a7\u00a7 580, 585;&nbsp;<em>Greenup v. Rodman<\/em>&nbsp;(1986) 42 Cal.3d 822, 826.)<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>There was no question that the developer\u2019s cross-complaint failed to meet the requirements, but the&nbsp;<em>Yu<\/em>&nbsp;court also held that the allegation incorporating the underlying complaint by reference would not suffice either. The&nbsp;<em>Yu<\/em>&nbsp;court noted that neither statutes nor court rules establish any formal requirements for incorporation by reference, but common law contract principles require that: \u201c(1) the reference to another document [be] clear and unequivocal; (2) the reference [be] called to the attention of the other party, who consented to that term; and (3) the terms of the incorporated documents [be] known or easily available to the contracting parties.\u201d (Citing&nbsp;<em>Kleveland v. Chicago Title Ins. Co.<\/em>&nbsp;(2006) 141 Cal.App.4th 761, 765.)<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>After first pointing out that the alleged incorporation by reference was expressly \u201cfor identification and informational purposes only,\u201d the&nbsp;<em>Yu<\/em>&nbsp;court then found the complaint\u2019s allegation of damages \u201cnot less than $10 million\u201d to be inconsistent with the cross-complaint\u2019s allegation of damages \u201cin an amount precisely unknown,\u201d and \u201csubject to proof.\u201d Consequently, the incorporation by reference was not \u201cclear and unequivocal,\u201d nor was the precise amount \u201cadequately called to the attention of the other party.\u201d The&nbsp;<em>Yu<\/em>&nbsp;court ultimately faulted the developer for having failed to state any amounts in the cross-complaint:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u201c[W]e agree with the trial court\u2019s assessment that \u2018because the cross-complaint filed by ATMI specifically declined to state the amount of damages sought . . . , it seems contradictory to basic notions of due process and fairness to find that cross-defendants [the Fitch Entities] have been put on notice of their potential damages by virtue of an allegation in a complaint filed not against them, but against cross-complainant ATMI.\u2019\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Finally, the&nbsp;<em>Yu<\/em>&nbsp;court rejected an argument that Fitch had entered a general appearance, saying this went to the issue of service or jurisdiction, but not the amount of damages required for a default judgment. Likewise, the&nbsp;<em>Yu<\/em>&nbsp;court rejected an argument that Fitch could have readily calculated the damages because it had performed the work, saying that was no substitute for adequate notice or due process.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Christopher Kendrick and Valerie A. Moore | Haight Brown and Bonesteel LLP | January 7, 2019 In&nbsp;Yu v. Liberty Surplus Ins. Corp.&nbsp;(No. G054522, filed 12\/11\/18), a California appeals court held that a developer\u2019s failure to allege the amounts of damages sought in its cross-complaint rendered default judgments against a subcontractor void and, therefore, unenforceable against&hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/developers-failure-plead-amount-of-damages-cross-complaint-fatal-to-direct-action\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Developer\u2019s Failure to Plead Amount of Damages in Cross-Complaint Fatal to Direct Action Against Subcontractor\u2019s Insurers Based on Default Judgment<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[9914,9721],"tags":[9895,23,56],"class_list":["post-895464","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-insurance-coverage","category-property-damage","tag-advise-consult","tag-insurance-coverage","tag-property-damage","entry"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v25.0 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Developer\u2019s Failure to Plead Amount of Damages in Cross-Complaint Fatal to Direct Action Against Subcontractor\u2019s Insurers Based on Default Judgment - Advise &amp; Consult, Inc.<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"developer\u2019s failure to allege the amounts of damages sought in its cross-complaint rendered default judgments against a subcontractor void and unenforceable\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/developers-failure-plead-amount-of-damages-cross-complaint-fatal-to-direct-action\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Developer\u2019s Failure to Plead Amount of Damages in Cross-Complaint Fatal to Direct Action Against Subcontractor\u2019s Insurers Based on Default Judgment - Advise &amp; Consult, Inc.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"developer\u2019s failure to allege the amounts of damages sought in its cross-complaint rendered default judgments against a subcontractor void and unenforceable\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/developers-failure-plead-amount-of-damages-cross-complaint-fatal-to-direct-action\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Advise &amp; Consult, Inc.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Advise-Consult-Inc-126949043996790\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-01-30T18:54:46+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-01-30T19:16:55+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@adviseconsult\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@adviseconsult\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/developers-failure-plead-amount-of-damages-cross-complaint-fatal-to-direct-action\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/developers-failure-plead-amount-of-damages-cross-complaint-fatal-to-direct-action\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/0a11abe008083d5fb19c2b0feefe7bd7\"},\"headline\":\"Developer\u2019s Failure to Plead Amount of Damages in Cross-Complaint Fatal to Direct Action Against Subcontractor\u2019s Insurers Based on Default Judgment\",\"datePublished\":\"2019-01-30T18:54:46+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-01-30T19:16:55+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/developers-failure-plead-amount-of-damages-cross-complaint-fatal-to-direct-action\/\"},\"wordCount\":877,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#organization\"},\"keywords\":[\"Advise &amp; Consult\",\"insurance coverage\",\"property damage\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Insurance Coverage\",\"Property Damage\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/developers-failure-plead-amount-of-damages-cross-complaint-fatal-to-direct-action\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/developers-failure-plead-amount-of-damages-cross-complaint-fatal-to-direct-action\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/developers-failure-plead-amount-of-damages-cross-complaint-fatal-to-direct-action\/\",\"name\":\"Developer\u2019s Failure to Plead Amount of Damages in Cross-Complaint Fatal to Direct Action Against Subcontractor\u2019s Insurers Based on Default Judgment - Advise &amp; Consult, Inc.\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2019-01-30T18:54:46+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-01-30T19:16:55+00:00\",\"description\":\"developer\u2019s failure to allege the amounts of damages sought in its cross-complaint rendered default judgments against a subcontractor void and unenforceable\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/developers-failure-plead-amount-of-damages-cross-complaint-fatal-to-direct-action\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"Advise &amp; Consult, Inc.\",\"description\":\"Construction Expert Witnesses\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Advise & Consult\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/AC-Red-Logo.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/AC-Red-Logo.png\",\"width\":162,\"height\":75,\"caption\":\"Advise & Consult\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Advise-Consult-Inc-126949043996790\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/adviseconsult\",\"https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company-beta\/204526\/\",\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/user\/MrConstructionExpert\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/0a11abe008083d5fb19c2b0feefe7bd7\",\"name\":\"admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/b01e71b7acadd7657af782b7ad1a30cc?s=96&d=mm&r=pg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/b01e71b7acadd7657af782b7ad1a30cc?s=96&d=mm&r=pg\",\"caption\":\"admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"http:\/\/www.expertwitnessinconstruction.com\"]}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Developer\u2019s Failure to Plead Amount of Damages in Cross-Complaint Fatal to Direct Action Against Subcontractor\u2019s Insurers Based on Default Judgment - Advise &amp; Consult, Inc.","description":"developer\u2019s failure to allege the amounts of damages sought in its cross-complaint rendered default judgments against a subcontractor void and unenforceable","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/developers-failure-plead-amount-of-damages-cross-complaint-fatal-to-direct-action\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Developer\u2019s Failure to Plead Amount of Damages in Cross-Complaint Fatal to Direct Action Against Subcontractor\u2019s Insurers Based on Default Judgment - Advise &amp; Consult, Inc.","og_description":"developer\u2019s failure to allege the amounts of damages sought in its cross-complaint rendered default judgments against a subcontractor void and unenforceable","og_url":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/developers-failure-plead-amount-of-damages-cross-complaint-fatal-to-direct-action\/","og_site_name":"Advise &amp; Consult, Inc.","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Advise-Consult-Inc-126949043996790\/","article_published_time":"2019-01-30T18:54:46+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-01-30T19:16:55+00:00","author":"admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@adviseconsult","twitter_site":"@adviseconsult","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/developers-failure-plead-amount-of-damages-cross-complaint-fatal-to-direct-action\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/developers-failure-plead-amount-of-damages-cross-complaint-fatal-to-direct-action\/"},"author":{"name":"admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/0a11abe008083d5fb19c2b0feefe7bd7"},"headline":"Developer\u2019s Failure to Plead Amount of Damages in Cross-Complaint Fatal to Direct Action Against Subcontractor\u2019s Insurers Based on Default Judgment","datePublished":"2019-01-30T18:54:46+00:00","dateModified":"2019-01-30T19:16:55+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/developers-failure-plead-amount-of-damages-cross-complaint-fatal-to-direct-action\/"},"wordCount":877,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#organization"},"keywords":["Advise &amp; Consult","insurance coverage","property damage"],"articleSection":["Insurance Coverage","Property Damage"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/developers-failure-plead-amount-of-damages-cross-complaint-fatal-to-direct-action\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/developers-failure-plead-amount-of-damages-cross-complaint-fatal-to-direct-action\/","url":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/developers-failure-plead-amount-of-damages-cross-complaint-fatal-to-direct-action\/","name":"Developer\u2019s Failure to Plead Amount of Damages in Cross-Complaint Fatal to Direct Action Against Subcontractor\u2019s Insurers Based on Default Judgment - Advise &amp; Consult, Inc.","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2019-01-30T18:54:46+00:00","dateModified":"2019-01-30T19:16:55+00:00","description":"developer\u2019s failure to allege the amounts of damages sought in its cross-complaint rendered default judgments against a subcontractor void and unenforceable","inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/developers-failure-plead-amount-of-damages-cross-complaint-fatal-to-direct-action\/"]}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/","name":"Advise &amp; Consult, Inc.","description":"Construction Expert Witnesses","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#organization","name":"Advise & Consult","url":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/AC-Red-Logo.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/AC-Red-Logo.png","width":162,"height":75,"caption":"Advise & Consult"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Advise-Consult-Inc-126949043996790\/","https:\/\/x.com\/adviseconsult","https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company-beta\/204526\/","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/user\/MrConstructionExpert"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/0a11abe008083d5fb19c2b0feefe7bd7","name":"admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/b01e71b7acadd7657af782b7ad1a30cc?s=96&d=mm&r=pg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/b01e71b7acadd7657af782b7ad1a30cc?s=96&d=mm&r=pg","caption":"admin"},"sameAs":["http:\/\/www.expertwitnessinconstruction.com"]}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p2ztG6-3KWY","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/895464","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=895464"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/895464\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":895465,"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/895464\/revisions\/895465"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=895464"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=895464"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=895464"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}