{"id":896127,"date":"2019-07-09T14:26:35","date_gmt":"2019-07-09T20:26:35","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/?p=896127"},"modified":"2019-07-05T14:37:51","modified_gmt":"2019-07-05T20:37:51","slug":"court-rejects-breach-of-contract-plaintiff-claims","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/court-rejects-breach-of-contract-plaintiff-claims\/","title":{"rendered":"It\u2019s Not What You Thought You Signed That Counts: Chancery Court Rejects Plaintiffs\u2019 Claims For Breach of Contract Plaintiffs Thought They Had Made"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

Remsen Kinne and Alidad Vakili | K&L Gates<\/a> | July 1, 2019<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In Concerned Citizens of the Estates of Fairway Village, et al, v. Fairway Cap, LLC and Fairway Village Construction Inc.<\/em>, C.A. No. 2017-0924-JRS (Del. Ch. March 6, 2019), homeowners resident in Fairway Village, a residential planned community (\u201cPlaintiffs\u201d) claimed that plans and actions taken by one of the community\u2019s developers, defendant Fairway Cap, LLC (\u201cFairway Cap\u201d), to construct, own and lease townhouse condominiums in the community for use as rental apartments breached contractual provisions of Fairway Village\u2019s governing documents. In its verdict for defendants, the Court of Chancery (the \u201cCourt\u201d) rejected those claims, and concluded that Plaintiffs failed to prove a breach of contract and denied Plaintiffs\u2019 motion for summary judgment.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In proceedings prior to trial, the Court granted Plaintiff\u2019s motion for preliminary injunction and enjoined defendants from renting townhouses in the community pending the outcome of the trial. Subsequently, the Court dismissed Plaintiffs\u2019 breach of fiduciary duty and fraud claims, leaving only the breach of contract cause of action for trial.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In its findings the Court indicated that Fairway Cap initially wanted to acquire and develop only certain lots within the Community. The prior owner of the undeveloped lots in the Community defaulted on its loan presenting Fairway Cap with the opportunity to purchase the defaulted loan. By purchasing the defaulted loan, Fairway Cap was able to acquire all the remaining undeveloped lots within the Community. After several years of sluggish sales, Fairway Cap re-evaluated its objectives and decided the best and highest use of the remaining lots would be to build townhouses for use as rental apartments, maintain ownership, and rent them to long-term tenants. Testimony at trial indicated this would result in Fairway Cap owning and leasing more than 76% of the community\u2019s condominium units, in turn potentially increasing financing costs for homeowners purchasing and refinancing units and reducing Fairway Village\u2019s property values.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The decision\u2019s analysis first addressed Plaintiffs\u2019 argument that Fairway Village\u2019s governing documents contain restrictive covenants prohibiting the developer\u2019s plans. Plaintiffs bore the burden of proof, the Court held, to identify contractual restrictions on the use of Fairway Cap\u2019s property and how those restrictions had been breached. The Court noted that in real property-related contract breach claims such as Plaintiffs\u2019, the law facilitates free use of land not otherwise validly restricted.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Court ruled that Plaintiffs failed to meet their burden of proof because they did not identify any contractual commitment that restricted Fairway Cap from owning and renting units in the Community. The Court found that the governing documents clearly provided that a builder or developer can own units to sell or to rent and that \u201cexpress references to, or implicit recognition of, an owner\u2019s right to rent its condominium unit for residential purposes through the governing documents are too numerous to cite.\u201d A recital in a peripheral declaration document stating that the developer \u201cwill offer Condominium Units for sale to the public\u201d, the Court determined, was not incorporated in the governing documents and at best reflects only a then-present intention of the developer, \u201cnot \u2026 a promise to refrain from all other permitted uses in perpetuity.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Next, the Court addressed Plaintiffs\u2019 request for a permanent injunction (i) to prevent the developer from constructing townhouses for use as rental units, and (ii) to require the developer to construct townhouses for sale that conform with those already constructed. The Court held that by failing to prove a breach of contract, Plaintiffs also had not proven any predicate wrong and corresponding right of action as required for the Court to grant an equitable remedy such as a permanent injunction. That remedy may not be invoked, the Court indicated, to prevent the developer from lawfully exercising its contractual rights or from putting its property to a lawful use.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Court rejected Plaintiffs\u2019 contention that the Court should view the Fairway Village\u2019s governing documents \u201cin a macro sense\u201d through Plaintiffs\u2019 eyes. Instead, the Court stated that Delaware law requires adherence to the objective theory of contracts in interpreting the governing documents, \u201cby \u2018standing in the shoes of an objectively reasonable third-party observer\u2019 who is bound to give ordinary meaning to the words used by the parties and to enforce the agreements as written when that meaning can be readily discerned.\u201d The Court did not accept Plaintiffs\u2019 argument that Fairway Cap\u2019s rental plan should be enjoined because it fundamentally alters the community and its governance scheme, leaving the developer in control of Fairway Village\u2019s condominium council, even though homeowners contemplated that control would be turned over to them, in support of which Plaintiffs cited references in the governing documents requiring the developer\u2019s consent to certain amendments. The Court went on to observe that no restriction in the governing documents or in law prohibited Fairway Cap\u2019s ownership of multiple units and resulting voting control. The Court noted that Plaintiffs\u2019 \u201cvague sense\u201d of being treated unfairly is not sufficient to justify granting equitable relief.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Notably, in reaching its verdict for the defendants, the Court pointed out that the \u201cPlaintiffs cannot prevail on their breach of contract claim by proving Defendants breached the contract Plaintiffs thought they had made.\u201d<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Remsen Kinne and Alidad Vakili | K&L Gates | July 1, 2019 In Concerned Citizens of the Estates of Fairway Village, et al, v. Fairway Cap, LLC and Fairway Village Construction Inc., C.A. No. 2017-0924-JRS (Del. Ch. March 6, 2019), homeowners resident in Fairway Village, a residential planned community (\u201cPlaintiffs\u201d) claimed that plans and actions… Continue reading It\u2019s Not What You Thought You Signed That Counts: Chancery Court Rejects Plaintiffs\u2019 Claims For Breach of Contract Plaintiffs Thought They Had Made<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[9],"tags":[9895,72],"class_list":["post-896127","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-construction-contracts","tag-advise-consult","tag-construction-contracts-2","entry"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"yoast_head":"\nIt\u2019s Not What You Thought You Signed That Counts: Chancery Court Rejects Plaintiffs\u2019 Claims For Breach of Contract Plaintiffs Thought They Had Made - Advise & Consult, Inc.<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Plaintiffs cannot prevail on their breach of contract claim by proving Defendants breached the contract Plaintiffs thought they had made\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/court-rejects-breach-of-contract-plaintiff-claims\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"It\u2019s Not What You Thought You Signed That Counts: Chancery Court Rejects Plaintiffs\u2019 Claims For Breach of Contract Plaintiffs Thought They Had Made - Advise & Consult, Inc.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Plaintiffs cannot prevail on their breach of contract claim by proving Defendants breached the contract Plaintiffs thought they had made\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/court-rejects-breach-of-contract-plaintiff-claims\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Advise & Consult, Inc.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Advise-Consult-Inc-126949043996790\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-07-09T20:26:35+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@adviseconsult\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@adviseconsult\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/court-rejects-breach-of-contract-plaintiff-claims\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/court-rejects-breach-of-contract-plaintiff-claims\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/0a11abe008083d5fb19c2b0feefe7bd7\"},\"headline\":\"It\u2019s Not What You Thought You Signed That Counts: Chancery Court Rejects Plaintiffs\u2019 Claims For Breach of Contract Plaintiffs Thought They Had Made\",\"datePublished\":\"2019-07-09T20:26:35+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/court-rejects-breach-of-contract-plaintiff-claims\/\"},\"wordCount\":894,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#organization\"},\"keywords\":[\"Advise & Consult\",\"construction contracts\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Construction Contracts\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/court-rejects-breach-of-contract-plaintiff-claims\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/court-rejects-breach-of-contract-plaintiff-claims\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/court-rejects-breach-of-contract-plaintiff-claims\/\",\"name\":\"It\u2019s Not What You Thought You Signed That Counts: Chancery Court Rejects Plaintiffs\u2019 Claims For Breach of Contract Plaintiffs Thought They Had Made - Advise & Consult, Inc.\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2019-07-09T20:26:35+00:00\",\"description\":\"Plaintiffs cannot prevail on their breach of contract claim by proving Defendants breached the contract Plaintiffs thought they had made\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/court-rejects-breach-of-contract-plaintiff-claims\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"Advise & Consult, Inc.\",\"description\":\"Construction Expert Witnesses\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Advise & Consult\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/AC-Red-Logo.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/AC-Red-Logo.png\",\"width\":162,\"height\":75,\"caption\":\"Advise & Consult\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Advise-Consult-Inc-126949043996790\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/adviseconsult\",\"https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company-beta\/204526\/\",\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/user\/MrConstructionExpert\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/0a11abe008083d5fb19c2b0feefe7bd7\",\"name\":\"admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/b01e71b7acadd7657af782b7ad1a30cc?s=96&d=mm&r=pg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/b01e71b7acadd7657af782b7ad1a30cc?s=96&d=mm&r=pg\",\"caption\":\"admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"http:\/\/www.expertwitnessinconstruction.com\"]}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"It\u2019s Not What You Thought You Signed That Counts: Chancery Court Rejects Plaintiffs\u2019 Claims For Breach of Contract Plaintiffs Thought They Had Made - Advise & Consult, Inc.","description":"Plaintiffs cannot prevail on their breach of contract claim by proving Defendants breached the contract Plaintiffs thought they had made","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/court-rejects-breach-of-contract-plaintiff-claims\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"It\u2019s Not What You Thought You Signed That Counts: Chancery Court Rejects Plaintiffs\u2019 Claims For Breach of Contract Plaintiffs Thought They Had Made - Advise & Consult, Inc.","og_description":"Plaintiffs cannot prevail on their breach of contract claim by proving Defendants breached the contract Plaintiffs thought they had made","og_url":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/court-rejects-breach-of-contract-plaintiff-claims\/","og_site_name":"Advise & Consult, Inc.","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Advise-Consult-Inc-126949043996790\/","article_published_time":"2019-07-09T20:26:35+00:00","author":"admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@adviseconsult","twitter_site":"@adviseconsult","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/court-rejects-breach-of-contract-plaintiff-claims\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/court-rejects-breach-of-contract-plaintiff-claims\/"},"author":{"name":"admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/0a11abe008083d5fb19c2b0feefe7bd7"},"headline":"It\u2019s Not What You Thought You Signed That Counts: Chancery Court Rejects Plaintiffs\u2019 Claims For Breach of Contract Plaintiffs Thought They Had Made","datePublished":"2019-07-09T20:26:35+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/court-rejects-breach-of-contract-plaintiff-claims\/"},"wordCount":894,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#organization"},"keywords":["Advise & Consult","construction contracts"],"articleSection":["Construction Contracts"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/court-rejects-breach-of-contract-plaintiff-claims\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/court-rejects-breach-of-contract-plaintiff-claims\/","url":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/court-rejects-breach-of-contract-plaintiff-claims\/","name":"It\u2019s Not What You Thought You Signed That Counts: Chancery Court Rejects Plaintiffs\u2019 Claims For Breach of Contract Plaintiffs Thought They Had Made - Advise & Consult, Inc.","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2019-07-09T20:26:35+00:00","description":"Plaintiffs cannot prevail on their breach of contract claim by proving Defendants breached the contract Plaintiffs thought they had made","inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/court-rejects-breach-of-contract-plaintiff-claims\/"]}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/","name":"Advise & Consult, Inc.","description":"Construction Expert Witnesses","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#organization","name":"Advise & Consult","url":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/AC-Red-Logo.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/AC-Red-Logo.png","width":162,"height":75,"caption":"Advise & Consult"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Advise-Consult-Inc-126949043996790\/","https:\/\/x.com\/adviseconsult","https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company-beta\/204526\/","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/user\/MrConstructionExpert"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/0a11abe008083d5fb19c2b0feefe7bd7","name":"admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/b01e71b7acadd7657af782b7ad1a30cc?s=96&d=mm&r=pg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/b01e71b7acadd7657af782b7ad1a30cc?s=96&d=mm&r=pg","caption":"admin"},"sameAs":["http:\/\/www.expertwitnessinconstruction.com"]}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p2ztG6-3L7F","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/896127","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=896127"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/896127\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":896128,"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/896127\/revisions\/896128"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=896127"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=896127"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=896127"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}