{"id":896896,"date":"2020-01-01T13:58:50","date_gmt":"2020-01-01T20:58:50","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/?p=896896"},"modified":"2019-12-31T14:04:49","modified_gmt":"2019-12-31T21:04:49","slug":"connecticut-court-decides-significant-coverage-issues","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/connecticut-court-decides-significant-coverage-issues\/","title":{"rendered":"Breaking News: Connecticut Supreme Court Decides Significant Coverage Issues in R.T. Vanderbilt"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

Patricia B. Santelle and Ciaran B. Way | White and Williams<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

On October 4, 2019 (almost two years after granting certification), the Connecticut Supreme Court affirmed the Appellate Court\u2019s rulings on four key coverage issues in R.T. Vanderbilt Company v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company, et al. <\/em>The coverage dispute in Vanderbilt <\/em>concerns underlying actions alleging that talc and silica mined and sold by the insured contained asbestos and\/or caused asbestos-related disease. The case has been proceeding in phases, two of which have been tried to date, resulting in the matter on appeal.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

(1) \u201cContinuous Trigger\u201d Theory of Coverage Applies: <\/strong>The Court affirmed and adopted the Appellate Court\u2019s opinion applying a \u201ccontinuous trigger\u201d for the underlying claims at issue, and agreed that the trial court properly excluded testimony from medical experts the insurers had proffered to prove that the asbestos disease process did not support a continuous trigger.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

(2) The \u201cUnavailability of Insurance\u201d Exception to Time-on-Risk Pro Rata Allocation Applies: <\/strong>The Court affirmed and adopted the Appellate Court\u2019s ruling that (a) damages and defense costs should not be allocated to any period in which insurance was \u201cunavailable\u201d in the market, (b) the insurers bear the burden of proving that coverage for asbestos liabilities was available to the policyholder after the date asbestos exclusions were added to the policies and (c) the insured bears the burden of proving that it was unable to obtain asbestos coverage prior to 1986 (when such insurance was generally available). The Appellate Court recognized that, in certain circumstances, there could be an \u201cequitable exception\u201d to the unavailability rule if the insured continued to manufacture products containing asbestos after 1986 with the knowledge that such products were hazardous and uninsurable (circumstances which the court found were not present in this case).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

(3) The \u201cSudden and Accidental\u201d and \u201cAbsolute\u201d Pollution Exclusions Are Only Applicable to Claims Arising From \u201cTraditional\u201d Environmental Pollution and Not Occupational Disease Caused by Exposure to Asbestos: <\/strong>The Court affirmed and adopted the Appellate Court\u2019s conclusion that the pollution exclusions were intended to apply only to \u201ctraditional environmental pollution\u201d and not to disease caused by exposure to asbestos. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

(4) Occupational Disease Exclusions Precludes Coverage for Claims of Occupational Disease, Regardless of Whether the Claimant Was Employed by the Policyholder or a Third Party: <\/strong>Noting that this is an issue of first impression nationally, the Court affirmed the Appellate Court\u2019s ruling that the occupational disease exclusions contained in certain excess policies applied to the underlying asbestos-related claims, which the parties stipulated were brought by non-employees. The Court agreed with the insurers\u2019 argument that \u201coccupational disease\u201d has a plain meaning that is broader than the workers\u2019 compensation context.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

This is the first occasion in which the Connecticut Supreme Court has ruled definitively on the application of a \u201ccontinuous trigger,\u201d the \u201cunavailability\u201d rule and the application of pollution exclusions in the context of asbestos-related claims. As noted above, the occupational disease exclusion issue was one which the Court noted is of first impression nationally.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The 98-page Appellate Court decision in Vanderbilt<\/em> can be found at R.T. Vanderbilt Company, Inc. v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company<\/a><\/em>, 171 Conn. App. 61 (Conn. App. Ct. March 7, 2017). The Supreme Court decision will be officially released shortly.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Patricia B. Santelle and Ciaran B. Way | White and Williams On October 4, 2019 (almost two years after granting certification), the Connecticut Supreme Court affirmed the Appellate Court\u2019s rulings on four key coverage issues in R.T. Vanderbilt Company v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company, et al. The coverage dispute in Vanderbilt concerns underlying actions alleging that talc and… Continue reading Breaking News: Connecticut Supreme Court Decides Significant Coverage Issues in R.T. Vanderbilt<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[9914],"tags":[9895,34,7853,6171,23],"class_list":["post-896896","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-insurance-coverage","tag-advise-consult","tag-asbestos","tag-connecticut","tag-continuous-trigger","tag-insurance-coverage","entry"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"yoast_head":"\nBreaking News: Connecticut Supreme Court Decides Significant Coverage Issues in R.T. Vanderbilt - Advise & Consult, Inc.<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"coverage dispute concerns alleging that talc and silica mined and sold by the insured contained asbestos and\/or caused asbestos-related disease\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/connecticut-court-decides-significant-coverage-issues\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Breaking News: Connecticut Supreme Court Decides Significant Coverage Issues in R.T. Vanderbilt - Advise & Consult, Inc.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"coverage dispute concerns alleging that talc and silica mined and sold by the insured contained asbestos and\/or caused asbestos-related disease\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/connecticut-court-decides-significant-coverage-issues\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Advise & Consult, Inc.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Advise-Consult-Inc-126949043996790\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2020-01-01T20:58:50+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@adviseconsult\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@adviseconsult\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/connecticut-court-decides-significant-coverage-issues\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/connecticut-court-decides-significant-coverage-issues\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/0a11abe008083d5fb19c2b0feefe7bd7\"},\"headline\":\"Breaking News: Connecticut Supreme Court Decides Significant Coverage Issues in R.T. Vanderbilt\",\"datePublished\":\"2020-01-01T20:58:50+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/connecticut-court-decides-significant-coverage-issues\/\"},\"wordCount\":556,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#organization\"},\"keywords\":[\"Advise & Consult\",\"asbestos\",\"Connecticut\",\"Continuous Trigger\",\"insurance coverage\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Insurance Coverage\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/connecticut-court-decides-significant-coverage-issues\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/connecticut-court-decides-significant-coverage-issues\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/connecticut-court-decides-significant-coverage-issues\/\",\"name\":\"Breaking News: Connecticut Supreme Court Decides Significant Coverage Issues in R.T. Vanderbilt - Advise & Consult, Inc.\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2020-01-01T20:58:50+00:00\",\"description\":\"coverage dispute concerns alleging that talc and silica mined and sold by the insured contained asbestos and\/or caused asbestos-related disease\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/connecticut-court-decides-significant-coverage-issues\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"Advise & Consult, Inc.\",\"description\":\"Construction Expert Witnesses\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Advise & Consult\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/AC-Red-Logo.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/AC-Red-Logo.png\",\"width\":162,\"height\":75,\"caption\":\"Advise & Consult\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Advise-Consult-Inc-126949043996790\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/adviseconsult\",\"https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company-beta\/204526\/\",\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/user\/MrConstructionExpert\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/0a11abe008083d5fb19c2b0feefe7bd7\",\"name\":\"admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/b01e71b7acadd7657af782b7ad1a30cc?s=96&d=mm&r=pg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/b01e71b7acadd7657af782b7ad1a30cc?s=96&d=mm&r=pg\",\"caption\":\"admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"http:\/\/www.expertwitnessinconstruction.com\"]}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Breaking News: Connecticut Supreme Court Decides Significant Coverage Issues in R.T. Vanderbilt - Advise & Consult, Inc.","description":"coverage dispute concerns alleging that talc and silica mined and sold by the insured contained asbestos and\/or caused asbestos-related disease","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/connecticut-court-decides-significant-coverage-issues\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Breaking News: Connecticut Supreme Court Decides Significant Coverage Issues in R.T. Vanderbilt - Advise & Consult, Inc.","og_description":"coverage dispute concerns alleging that talc and silica mined and sold by the insured contained asbestos and\/or caused asbestos-related disease","og_url":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/connecticut-court-decides-significant-coverage-issues\/","og_site_name":"Advise & Consult, Inc.","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Advise-Consult-Inc-126949043996790\/","article_published_time":"2020-01-01T20:58:50+00:00","author":"admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@adviseconsult","twitter_site":"@adviseconsult","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"admin","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/connecticut-court-decides-significant-coverage-issues\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/connecticut-court-decides-significant-coverage-issues\/"},"author":{"name":"admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/0a11abe008083d5fb19c2b0feefe7bd7"},"headline":"Breaking News: Connecticut Supreme Court Decides Significant Coverage Issues in R.T. Vanderbilt","datePublished":"2020-01-01T20:58:50+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/connecticut-court-decides-significant-coverage-issues\/"},"wordCount":556,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#organization"},"keywords":["Advise & Consult","asbestos","Connecticut","Continuous Trigger","insurance coverage"],"articleSection":["Insurance Coverage"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/connecticut-court-decides-significant-coverage-issues\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/connecticut-court-decides-significant-coverage-issues\/","url":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/connecticut-court-decides-significant-coverage-issues\/","name":"Breaking News: Connecticut Supreme Court Decides Significant Coverage Issues in R.T. Vanderbilt - Advise & Consult, Inc.","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2020-01-01T20:58:50+00:00","description":"coverage dispute concerns alleging that talc and silica mined and sold by the insured contained asbestos and\/or caused asbestos-related disease","inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/connecticut-court-decides-significant-coverage-issues\/"]}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/","name":"Advise & Consult, Inc.","description":"Construction Expert Witnesses","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#organization","name":"Advise & Consult","url":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/AC-Red-Logo.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/AC-Red-Logo.png","width":162,"height":75,"caption":"Advise & Consult"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Advise-Consult-Inc-126949043996790\/","https:\/\/x.com\/adviseconsult","https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company-beta\/204526\/","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/user\/MrConstructionExpert"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/0a11abe008083d5fb19c2b0feefe7bd7","name":"admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/b01e71b7acadd7657af782b7ad1a30cc?s=96&d=mm&r=pg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/b01e71b7acadd7657af782b7ad1a30cc?s=96&d=mm&r=pg","caption":"admin"},"sameAs":["http:\/\/www.expertwitnessinconstruction.com"]}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p2ztG6-3Lk4","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/896896","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=896896"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/896896\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":896897,"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/896896\/revisions\/896897"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=896896"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=896896"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=896896"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}