{"id":897799,"date":"2020-08-05T15:19:00","date_gmt":"2020-08-05T21:19:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/?p=897799"},"modified":"2020-08-04T15:27:48","modified_gmt":"2020-08-04T21:27:48","slug":"lease-leaseback-shootouts","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/lease-leaseback-shootouts\/","title":{"rendered":"Is it the End of the Lease-Leaseback Shootouts? Maybe."},"content":{"rendered":"\n

Garret Murai | California Construction Law Blog<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

It\u2019s the case that has turned into a modern day Hatfield versus McCoy \u2013\u00a0McGee v. Torrance Unified School District<\/em>, Case No. 8298122, 2nd District Court of Appeals (May 29, 2020) \u2013 a series of cases challenging the validity of certain lease-leaseback construction contracts in California.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In shootout number one, James McGee sued the Torrance Unified School District challenging the validity of lease-leaseback contracts the District had entered into with general contractor Balfour Beatty Construction, LLC. Under California\u2019s lease-leaseback statute, a school district can lease property it owns to a developer, who in turns builds a school facility on the property and leases the facility back to the school district. The primary benefit of the lease-leaseback method of project delivery is that a school district does not need to come up with money to build the facility because the district pays for the facility over time through lease payments to the developer. In shootout number one, McGee argued that Torrance Unified School District was required to competitively bid the lease-leasebacks projects. The 2nd District Court of Appeals disagreed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In shootout number two,\u00a0McGee v. Balfour Beatty Construction<\/em>, LLC 247 Cal.App.4th 235 (2016), McGee sued Balfour Beatty arguing that lease-leaseback contracts the general contractor had entered into with the District were a \u201csham,\u201d because the lease-leaseback agreements at issue, rather than requiring that Balfour Beatty finance construction and receive lease payments following completion of the projects, the lease-leaseback contracts required the District to make progress payments disguised as \u201clease payments\u201d to Balfour Beatty during construction of the project. Once again, the 2nd District Court of Appeals disagreed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

McGee III<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

In the latest shootout, McGee sued the District arguing that the lease-leaseback projects with Balfour Beatty should be set aside because Balfour Beatty provided pre-construction services to the District. By providing pre-construction services, McGee argued, Balfour Beatty was an employee of the District. And as an employee of the District, Balfour Beatty had a conflict of interest under Government Code Section 1090, which precludes employees of a public agency to be financially interested in any contract with the public agency, and shouldn\u2019t have been allowed to act as the general contractor on the projects.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

A bench trial was held and among the evidence presented was testimony that the projects at issue had been completed. Finding that McGee\u2019s case was an \u201cin rem reverse validation action,\u201d which is simply a fancy phrase for an action seeking to invalidate an action by a public entity, the trial court found that McGee\u2019s in rem reverse validation action was moot because the projects were completed and there was nothing left to invalidate.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

McGee appealed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Appeal<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

On appeal, the Court of Appeal explained that \u201c[a] case is considered moot when \u2018the question addressed was at one time a live issue in the case,\u2019 but has been deprived of life \u2018because of events occurring after the judicial process was initiated.’\u201d:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Because \u201cthe duty of every . . . judicial tribunal . . . is to decide actual controversies by a judgment which can be carried into effect, and not give opinions upon moot questions or . . . to declare principles or rules of law which cannot affect the matter in issue in the case before it[,] [I]t necessarily follows that when . . . an event occurs that renders it impossible for [the] court, if should decide the case in favor of plaintiff, to grant him any effectual relief whatsoever, the court will not proceed to formal judgment.\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Here, explained the Court of Appeals, Government Code Section 860 permits an interested person to bring an action challenging the validity of an action by a public entity. Known as a \u201creverse validation action,\u201d explained the Court, Section 860 is intended to provide a \u201cspeedy determination of the validity of the public agency\u2019s action\u201d and \u201c[g]iven the public interest in quickly resolving the legality of agency decisions, \u2018California law has long recognized that the completion of a public works project moots challenges to the valid of the contracts under which the project was carried out.’\u201d And, here, held the Court, the projects at issue had been completed at the time of the trial court\u2019s decision.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In response, McGee argued that his lawsuit was not an in rem reverse validation action, but rather a taxpayer claim under Code of Civil Procedure Section 526a, which authorizes a taxpayer to file an action to enjoin waste by a local public agency. As such, argued McGee \u201cmootness\u201d did not apply.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Court of Appeals disagreed:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[R]egardless of\u00a0how McGee characterizes his conflict of interest claims or the relief he seeks, the gravamen is the invalidity of the lease-leaseback agreements. McGee admits he seeks \u201ca finding that the contracts were ultra vires, illegal, void, and unenforceable due to a conflict of interest.\u201d His complaints alleged as much. A judgment finding Balfour violated section 1090 would render the lease-leaseback agreements \u201c\u2018void from [their] inception.’\u201d (McGee II, supra,<\/em>\u00a0247 Cal.App.4th at p. 247.) Although McGee focuses on the fact that he seeks disgorgement directly from Balfour, any judgment ordering disgorgement would\u00a0require<\/em>\u00a0a finding the lease-leaseback agreements were void. In other words, the agreements would\u00a0necessarily<\/em>\u00a0be invalidated.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Further held the Court of Appeals:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

A judgment in McGee\u2019s favor would also undermine the very purpose behind the validation statutes. A cloud has hung over the challenged projects for years,<\/em> destroying any hope in prompt validation of the underlying lease-leaseback agreements. That delay is largely attributable to McGee, who strategically chose not to prevent the projects from moving forward. Beyond the specific projects here, a judgment in McGee\u2019s favor would threaten future<\/em> projects with the prospect of lawsuits long after completion. That would undoubtedly inhibit the District\u2019s ability to obtain financing for them.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Conclusion<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

So there you have it. The presumable end to the McGee lease-leaseback cases. But then again, with McGee, never say never.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Garret Murai | California Construction Law Blog It\u2019s the case that has turned into a modern day Hatfield versus McCoy \u2013\u00a0McGee v. Torrance Unified School District, Case No. 8298122, 2nd District Court of Appeals (May 29, 2020) \u2013 a series of cases challenging the validity of certain lease-leaseback construction contracts in California. In shootout number… Continue reading Is it the End of the Lease-Leaseback Shootouts? Maybe.<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[9],"tags":[9895,224,11250],"class_list":["post-897799","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-construction-contracts","tag-advise-consult","tag-construction-contract","tag-lease-leaseback-construction-contract","entry"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"yoast_head":"\nIs it the End of the Lease-Leaseback Shootouts? Maybe. - Advise & Consult, Inc.<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"2nd District Court of Appeals series of cases challenging the validity of certain lease-leaseback construction contracts in California\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/lease-leaseback-shootouts\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Is it the End of the Lease-Leaseback Shootouts? Maybe. - Advise & Consult, Inc.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"2nd District Court of Appeals series of cases challenging the validity of certain lease-leaseback construction contracts in California\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/lease-leaseback-shootouts\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Advise & Consult, Inc.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Advise-Consult-Inc-126949043996790\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2020-08-05T21:19:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@adviseconsult\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@adviseconsult\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/lease-leaseback-shootouts\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/lease-leaseback-shootouts\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/0a11abe008083d5fb19c2b0feefe7bd7\"},\"headline\":\"Is it the End of the Lease-Leaseback Shootouts? Maybe.\",\"datePublished\":\"2020-08-05T21:19:00+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/lease-leaseback-shootouts\/\"},\"wordCount\":989,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#organization\"},\"keywords\":[\"Advise & Consult\",\"Construction Contract\",\"Lease-Leaseback Construction Contract\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Construction Contracts\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/lease-leaseback-shootouts\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/lease-leaseback-shootouts\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/lease-leaseback-shootouts\/\",\"name\":\"Is it the End of the Lease-Leaseback Shootouts? Maybe. - Advise & Consult, Inc.\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2020-08-05T21:19:00+00:00\",\"description\":\"2nd District Court of Appeals series of cases challenging the validity of certain lease-leaseback construction contracts in California\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/lease-leaseback-shootouts\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"Advise & Consult, Inc.\",\"description\":\"Construction Expert Witnesses\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Advise & Consult\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/AC-Red-Logo.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/AC-Red-Logo.png\",\"width\":162,\"height\":75,\"caption\":\"Advise & Consult\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Advise-Consult-Inc-126949043996790\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/adviseconsult\",\"https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company-beta\/204526\/\",\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/user\/MrConstructionExpert\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/0a11abe008083d5fb19c2b0feefe7bd7\",\"name\":\"admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/b01e71b7acadd7657af782b7ad1a30cc?s=96&d=mm&r=pg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/b01e71b7acadd7657af782b7ad1a30cc?s=96&d=mm&r=pg\",\"caption\":\"admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"http:\/\/www.expertwitnessinconstruction.com\"]}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Is it the End of the Lease-Leaseback Shootouts? Maybe. - Advise & Consult, Inc.","description":"2nd District Court of Appeals series of cases challenging the validity of certain lease-leaseback construction contracts in California","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/lease-leaseback-shootouts\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Is it the End of the Lease-Leaseback Shootouts? Maybe. - Advise & Consult, Inc.","og_description":"2nd District Court of Appeals series of cases challenging the validity of certain lease-leaseback construction contracts in California","og_url":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/lease-leaseback-shootouts\/","og_site_name":"Advise & Consult, Inc.","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Advise-Consult-Inc-126949043996790\/","article_published_time":"2020-08-05T21:19:00+00:00","author":"admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@adviseconsult","twitter_site":"@adviseconsult","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/lease-leaseback-shootouts\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/lease-leaseback-shootouts\/"},"author":{"name":"admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/0a11abe008083d5fb19c2b0feefe7bd7"},"headline":"Is it the End of the Lease-Leaseback Shootouts? Maybe.","datePublished":"2020-08-05T21:19:00+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/lease-leaseback-shootouts\/"},"wordCount":989,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#organization"},"keywords":["Advise & Consult","Construction Contract","Lease-Leaseback Construction Contract"],"articleSection":["Construction Contracts"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/lease-leaseback-shootouts\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/lease-leaseback-shootouts\/","url":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/lease-leaseback-shootouts\/","name":"Is it the End of the Lease-Leaseback Shootouts? Maybe. - Advise & Consult, Inc.","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2020-08-05T21:19:00+00:00","description":"2nd District Court of Appeals series of cases challenging the validity of certain lease-leaseback construction contracts in California","inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/lease-leaseback-shootouts\/"]}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/","name":"Advise & Consult, Inc.","description":"Construction Expert Witnesses","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#organization","name":"Advise & Consult","url":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/AC-Red-Logo.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/AC-Red-Logo.png","width":162,"height":75,"caption":"Advise & Consult"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Advise-Consult-Inc-126949043996790\/","https:\/\/x.com\/adviseconsult","https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company-beta\/204526\/","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/user\/MrConstructionExpert"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/0a11abe008083d5fb19c2b0feefe7bd7","name":"admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/b01e71b7acadd7657af782b7ad1a30cc?s=96&d=mm&r=pg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/b01e71b7acadd7657af782b7ad1a30cc?s=96&d=mm&r=pg","caption":"admin"},"sameAs":["http:\/\/www.expertwitnessinconstruction.com"]}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p2ztG6-3LyD","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/897799","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=897799"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/897799\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":897800,"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/897799\/revisions\/897800"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=897799"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=897799"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=897799"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}