{"id":898515,"date":"2021-02-23T16:18:19","date_gmt":"2021-02-23T23:18:19","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/?p=898515"},"modified":"2021-02-23T16:18:22","modified_gmt":"2021-02-23T23:18:22","slug":"right-to-repair-act-ca","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/right-to-repair-act-ca\/","title":{"rendered":"Close Enough Only Counts in Horseshoes and Hand Grenades"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>Garret Murai | <a href=\"https:\/\/calconstructionlawblog.com\/2021\/02\/22\/close-enough-only-counts-in-horseshoes-and-hand-grenades-right-to-repair-act-not-end-all-be-all-in-action-against-product-manufacturer\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener nofollow\">California Construction Law Blog<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In\u00a0<em>State Farm General Insurance Company v. Oetiker, Inc.<\/em>, Case No. B302348 (December 18, 2020), a manufacturer sued in subrogation action under the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/class-actions-californias-right-repair-act-nope-well-nope\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Right to Repair Act<\/a> almost got away. Almost.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>The Oetiker Case<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>James and Jennifer Philson\u2019s home was substantially completed, and a notice of completion was recorded, in 2004. In 2016, the Philsons tendered a claim to their homeowner\u2019s insurance carrier, State Farm General Insurance Company, after their home experienced significant water damage due to a defective stainless steel ear clamp.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In 2018, after paying the Philson\u2019s claim, State Farm filed a subrogation action against the manufacturer of the ear clamp, Oetiker, Inc. State Farm\u2019s complaint, which included causes of action for negligence, strict products liability and breach of implied warranty, alleged that the home was \u201cdamaged by a water leak from the failure of a defective stainless steel ear claim on a water PEX fitting\u201d and that the ear clamp was \u201cdefective when it left the control of [Oetiker].\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Because Philson\u2019s home was newly constructed when purchased, Oetiker claimed that State Farm\u2019s subrogation claim was subject to the Right to Repair Act which included a 10-year statute of repose for latent defects and filed a motion for summary judgment on that basis.&nbsp;The trial court granted Oetiker\u2019s summary judgment finding that \u201cOetiker has established that Plaintiff\u2019s claims for property damage . . . fall within Civil Code section 896(a)(14), (15) [of the Right to Repair Act].\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>State Farm appealed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">The Appeal<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>On appeal, the 2nd District Court of Appeal explained that the Right to Repair Act, while it applies generally to \u201cbuilders,\u201d also applies as set forth in the Act, \u201cto the extent set forth in Chapter 4 . . . [an]&nbsp;<em>individual product manufacturer<\/em>&nbsp;. . . [who] shall, except as specifically set forth in this title, be liable for, and the claimant\u2019s claims or causes of action shall be limited to violation of . . . the standards [set forth in the Act].\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Thus, explained the Court of Appeal, the threshold question was whether the defective ear clamp fell within the standards set forth under the Right to Repair Act. The Court held that it did explaining that the standards require that the \u201clines and components of the plumbing system . . . shall not leak\u201d and that the \u201c[p]lumbing lines . . . shall not corrode so as to impede the useful life of the systems.\u201d And, here, explained the Court, the ear claim at issue was installed on a PEX fitting, a type of plumbing line fitting, and thus was part of the \u201clines and components of the plumbing system.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In response to State Farm\u2019s claim that the Right to Repair Act did not apply because Section 896(g)(3)E) of the Act excludes \u201cany action seeking recovery solely for a defect in a manufactured product located within or adjacent to the structure,\u201d the Court of Appeal held that the exception does not apply when a defective product causes a violation of the standards set forth in the Act.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Nevertheless, explained the Court of Appeal, while the Act precludes State Farm\u2019s negligence cause of action, the Act did not preclude State Farm\u2019s strict products liability and breach of implied warranty claims. Citing,\u00a0<em>McMillin Albany LLC v. Superior Court<\/em>\u00a0(2018) 4 Cal.5th 241, in which the California Supreme Court held that the Right to Repair Act replaces common causes of action including causes of action for negligence, strict products liability, breach of contract, and breach of warranty, the Court held that the Act applies different standards to builders versus non-builders, and as to product manufacturers Section 936 of the Act only provides that the Act only applies to a product manufacturer\u2019s negligent act or omission or breach of contract. Thus explained the Court of Appeal:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\"><p>[A] product manufacturer is liable under the Act only where its negligence or breach of contract caused a violation of the standards [set forth under the Act]. . . . State Farm is therefore precluded from bringing its negligence cause of action . . . [but] [w]e reach a different conclusion with respect to State Farm\u2019s strict liability and breach of implied warranty causes of action. Nothing in the Act restricts a homeowner or its insurer from bringing causes of action which fall outside of the Act.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Conclusion<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>I\u2019ve never had the chance to the see the Right to Repair Act applied to a products manufacturer, so this case was interesting. The Right to Repair Act is a relatively dense statute with a complicated history and I\u2019m always surprised when reading the cases that come out of it.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Garret Murai | California Construction Law Blog In\u00a0State Farm General Insurance Company v. Oetiker, Inc., Case No. B302348 (December 18, 2020), a manufacturer sued in subrogation action under the Right to Repair Act almost got away. Almost. The Oetiker Case James and Jennifer Philson\u2019s home was substantially completed, and a notice of completion was recorded,&hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/right-to-repair-act-ca\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Close Enough Only Counts in Horseshoes and Hand Grenades<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[172],"tags":[9895,88,434],"class_list":["post-898515","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-construction-law-2","tag-advise-consult","tag-california","tag-right-to-repair-act","entry"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v25.0 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Close Enough Only Counts in Horseshoes and Hand Grenades - Advise &amp; Consult, Inc.<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"a recent california case shows a manufacturer sued in subrogation action under the Right to Repair Act almost got away - almost\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/right-to-repair-act-ca\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Close Enough Only Counts in Horseshoes and Hand Grenades - Advise &amp; Consult, Inc.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"a recent california case shows a manufacturer sued in subrogation action under the Right to Repair Act almost got away - almost\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/right-to-repair-act-ca\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Advise &amp; Consult, Inc.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Advise-Consult-Inc-126949043996790\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2021-02-23T23:18:19+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2021-02-23T23:18:22+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@adviseconsult\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@adviseconsult\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/right-to-repair-act-ca\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/right-to-repair-act-ca\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/0a11abe008083d5fb19c2b0feefe7bd7\"},\"headline\":\"Close Enough Only Counts in Horseshoes and Hand Grenades\",\"datePublished\":\"2021-02-23T23:18:19+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2021-02-23T23:18:22+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/right-to-repair-act-ca\/\"},\"wordCount\":770,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#organization\"},\"keywords\":[\"Advise &amp; Consult\",\"california\",\"Right to Repair Act\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Construction Law\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/right-to-repair-act-ca\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/right-to-repair-act-ca\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/right-to-repair-act-ca\/\",\"name\":\"Close Enough Only Counts in Horseshoes and Hand Grenades - Advise &amp; Consult, Inc.\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2021-02-23T23:18:19+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2021-02-23T23:18:22+00:00\",\"description\":\"a recent california case shows a manufacturer sued in subrogation action under the Right to Repair Act almost got away - almost\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/right-to-repair-act-ca\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"Advise &amp; Consult, Inc.\",\"description\":\"Construction Expert Witnesses\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Advise & Consult\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/AC-Red-Logo.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/AC-Red-Logo.png\",\"width\":162,\"height\":75,\"caption\":\"Advise & Consult\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Advise-Consult-Inc-126949043996790\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/adviseconsult\",\"https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company-beta\/204526\/\",\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/user\/MrConstructionExpert\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/0a11abe008083d5fb19c2b0feefe7bd7\",\"name\":\"admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/b01e71b7acadd7657af782b7ad1a30cc?s=96&d=mm&r=pg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/b01e71b7acadd7657af782b7ad1a30cc?s=96&d=mm&r=pg\",\"caption\":\"admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"http:\/\/www.expertwitnessinconstruction.com\"]}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Close Enough Only Counts in Horseshoes and Hand Grenades - Advise &amp; Consult, Inc.","description":"a recent california case shows a manufacturer sued in subrogation action under the Right to Repair Act almost got away - almost","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/right-to-repair-act-ca\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Close Enough Only Counts in Horseshoes and Hand Grenades - Advise &amp; Consult, Inc.","og_description":"a recent california case shows a manufacturer sued in subrogation action under the Right to Repair Act almost got away - almost","og_url":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/right-to-repair-act-ca\/","og_site_name":"Advise &amp; Consult, Inc.","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Advise-Consult-Inc-126949043996790\/","article_published_time":"2021-02-23T23:18:19+00:00","article_modified_time":"2021-02-23T23:18:22+00:00","author":"admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@adviseconsult","twitter_site":"@adviseconsult","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/right-to-repair-act-ca\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/right-to-repair-act-ca\/"},"author":{"name":"admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/0a11abe008083d5fb19c2b0feefe7bd7"},"headline":"Close Enough Only Counts in Horseshoes and Hand Grenades","datePublished":"2021-02-23T23:18:19+00:00","dateModified":"2021-02-23T23:18:22+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/right-to-repair-act-ca\/"},"wordCount":770,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#organization"},"keywords":["Advise &amp; Consult","california","Right to Repair Act"],"articleSection":["Construction Law"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/right-to-repair-act-ca\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/right-to-repair-act-ca\/","url":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/right-to-repair-act-ca\/","name":"Close Enough Only Counts in Horseshoes and Hand Grenades - Advise &amp; Consult, Inc.","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2021-02-23T23:18:19+00:00","dateModified":"2021-02-23T23:18:22+00:00","description":"a recent california case shows a manufacturer sued in subrogation action under the Right to Repair Act almost got away - almost","inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/right-to-repair-act-ca\/"]}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/","name":"Advise &amp; Consult, Inc.","description":"Construction Expert Witnesses","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#organization","name":"Advise & Consult","url":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/AC-Red-Logo.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/AC-Red-Logo.png","width":162,"height":75,"caption":"Advise & Consult"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Advise-Consult-Inc-126949043996790\/","https:\/\/x.com\/adviseconsult","https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company-beta\/204526\/","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/user\/MrConstructionExpert"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/0a11abe008083d5fb19c2b0feefe7bd7","name":"admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/b01e71b7acadd7657af782b7ad1a30cc?s=96&d=mm&r=pg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/b01e71b7acadd7657af782b7ad1a30cc?s=96&d=mm&r=pg","caption":"admin"},"sameAs":["http:\/\/www.expertwitnessinconstruction.com"]}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p2ztG6-3LKb","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/898515","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=898515"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/898515\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":898516,"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/898515\/revisions\/898516"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=898515"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=898515"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=898515"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}