{"id":899781,"date":"2022-04-05T15:43:15","date_gmt":"2022-04-05T21:43:15","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/?p=899781"},"modified":"2022-04-05T15:43:18","modified_gmt":"2022-04-05T21:43:18","slug":"subsidence-exclusion-bars-coverage","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/subsidence-exclusion-bars-coverage\/","title":{"rendered":"Ninth Circuit Finds that \u201cSubsidence Exclusion\u201d Bars Coverage for Landslide Loss"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>Dina R. Richman | <a href=\"https:\/\/www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com\/2022\/03\/29\/ninth-circuit-finds-that-subsidence-exclusion-bars-coverage-for-landslide-loss\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener nofollow\">Property Insurance Law Observer<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals recently issued an unpublished opinion in\u00a0<em>Atain Specialty Insurance Company v. JKT Associates, Inc<\/em>., Case No. 20-16366 (9th Cir., March 11, 2022), finding that a liability policy\u2019s \u201c<a href=\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/earth-movement-exclusion\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Subsidence Exclusion<\/a>\u201d barred coverage for a lawsuit arising out of a landslide.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/11\/2022\/03\/landslide.jpg\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/11\/2022\/03\/landslide.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-2060\"\/><\/a><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>In<em>&nbsp;Atain<\/em>, the insured JKT was hired by a homeowner to perform landscape and hardscape work on her home.&nbsp; Several years later, a catastrophic landslide occurred,&nbsp; causing the rear of the property to slide downhill by 15 feet.&nbsp; Several lawsuits were filed against JKT.&nbsp; JKT tendered the suits to its insurer, Atain.&nbsp; Atain agreed to defend JKT under a reservation of rights.&nbsp;&nbsp; Subsequently, Atain filed a coverage action against JKT, seeking a declaration that there was no coverage as well as reimbursement of the defense costs it had paid.&nbsp; The district court granted summary judgment to Atain, concluding that JKT\u2019s liability under the suits was not covered by Atain policy because coverage was unambiguously precluded by the \u201cSubsidence Exclusion.\u201d&nbsp; The Ninth Circuit agreed with the district court, and affirmed the judgment.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The Subsidence Exclusion provided, in relevant part: &nbsp;&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>This insurance does not apply and there shall be no duty to defend or indemnify any insured for any \u201coccurrence\u201d, \u201csuit\u201d, liability, claim, demand or cause of action arising, in whole or part, out of any \u201cearth movement.\u201d This exclusion applies whether or not the \u201cearth movement\u201d arises out of any operations by or on behalf of any insured.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>&nbsp;\u201cEarth movement\u201d includes, but is not limited to, any earth sinking, rising, settling, tilting, shifting, slipping, falling away, caving, erosion, subsidence, mud flow or any other movements of land or earth.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The Ninth Circuit held that landslide is an \u201cearth movement,\u201d and therefore the plain terms of the exclusion barred any coverage for any claim \u201carising, in whole or part,\u201d from the landslide or from any \u201csettling\u201d or \u201cslipping\u201d that preceded that landslide, regardless of the cause of the landslide. &nbsp;&nbsp;The Court noted that there could be coverage only if either of the suits sought redress for non-landslide damages, which they did not.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>JKT attempted to point to an allegation that, prior to the landslide, JKT\u2019s negligence \u201cresult[ed] in changes in drainage patterns on the Property and the unwanted accumulation of water in the backyard.\u201d&nbsp; The Court, however, found that there was nothing in that allegation that supported an inference that the accumulation of water itself produced an injury separate from the land movement.&nbsp;&nbsp; Rather, the complaint stated that the excess water made it more susceptible to failure, which tied it back to the earth movement.&nbsp; Thus, the Court found there was no possibility of coverage, and no duty to defend or indemnify JKT.&nbsp;&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Although\u00a0<em>Atain<\/em>\u00a0is unpublished, the opinion provides valuable guidance on how courts may analyze this issue in the future.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>When one of your cases is in need of a construction expert, estimates, insurance appraisal or umpire services in defect or insurance disputes &#8211; please call Advise &amp; Consult, Inc. at 888.684.8305, or email <a href=\"mailto:experts@adviseandconsult.net\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">experts@adviseandconsult.net<\/a>.<\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Dina R. Richman | Property Insurance Law Observer The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals recently issued an unpublished opinion in\u00a0Atain Specialty Insurance Company v. JKT Associates, Inc., Case No. 20-16366 (9th Cir., March 11, 2022), finding that a liability policy\u2019s \u201cSubsidence Exclusion\u201d barred coverage for a lawsuit arising out of a landslide.\u00a0 In&nbsp;Atain, the insured&hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/subsidence-exclusion-bars-coverage\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Ninth Circuit Finds that \u201cSubsidence Exclusion\u201d Bars Coverage for Landslide Loss<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[10885],"tags":[9895,11658,11659],"class_list":["post-899781","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-property-insurance-claims","tag-advise-consult","tag-landslide","tag-subsidence-exclusion","entry"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v25.0 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Ninth Circuit Finds that \u201cSubsidence Exclusion\u201d Bars Coverage for Landslide Loss - Advise &amp; Consult, Inc.<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"finding that a liability policy\u2019s \u201cSubsidence Exclusion\u201d barred coverage for a lawsuit arising out of a landslide\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/subsidence-exclusion-bars-coverage\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ninth Circuit Finds that \u201cSubsidence Exclusion\u201d Bars Coverage for Landslide Loss - Advise &amp; Consult, Inc.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"finding that a liability policy\u2019s \u201cSubsidence Exclusion\u201d barred coverage for a lawsuit arising out of a landslide\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/subsidence-exclusion-bars-coverage\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Advise &amp; Consult, Inc.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Advise-Consult-Inc-126949043996790\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2022-04-05T21:43:15+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2022-04-05T21:43:18+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/11\/2022\/03\/landslide.jpg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@adviseconsult\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@adviseconsult\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/subsidence-exclusion-bars-coverage\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/subsidence-exclusion-bars-coverage\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/0a11abe008083d5fb19c2b0feefe7bd7\"},\"headline\":\"Ninth Circuit Finds that \u201cSubsidence Exclusion\u201d Bars Coverage for Landslide Loss\",\"datePublished\":\"2022-04-05T21:43:15+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2022-04-05T21:43:18+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/subsidence-exclusion-bars-coverage\/\"},\"wordCount\":543,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/subsidence-exclusion-bars-coverage\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/11\/2022\/03\/landslide.jpg\",\"keywords\":[\"Advise &amp; Consult\",\"Landslide\",\"Subsidence Exclusion\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Property Insurance Claims\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/subsidence-exclusion-bars-coverage\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/subsidence-exclusion-bars-coverage\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/subsidence-exclusion-bars-coverage\/\",\"name\":\"Ninth Circuit Finds that \u201cSubsidence Exclusion\u201d Bars Coverage for Landslide Loss - Advise &amp; Consult, Inc.\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/subsidence-exclusion-bars-coverage\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/subsidence-exclusion-bars-coverage\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/11\/2022\/03\/landslide.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2022-04-05T21:43:15+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2022-04-05T21:43:18+00:00\",\"description\":\"finding that a liability policy\u2019s \u201cSubsidence Exclusion\u201d barred coverage for a lawsuit arising out of a landslide\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/subsidence-exclusion-bars-coverage\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/subsidence-exclusion-bars-coverage\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/11\/2022\/03\/landslide.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/11\/2022\/03\/landslide.jpg\"},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"Advise &amp; Consult, Inc.\",\"description\":\"Construction Expert Witnesses\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Advise & Consult\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/AC-Red-Logo.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/AC-Red-Logo.png\",\"width\":162,\"height\":75,\"caption\":\"Advise & Consult\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Advise-Consult-Inc-126949043996790\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/adviseconsult\",\"https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company-beta\/204526\/\",\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/user\/MrConstructionExpert\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/0a11abe008083d5fb19c2b0feefe7bd7\",\"name\":\"admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/b01e71b7acadd7657af782b7ad1a30cc?s=96&d=mm&r=pg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/b01e71b7acadd7657af782b7ad1a30cc?s=96&d=mm&r=pg\",\"caption\":\"admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"http:\/\/www.expertwitnessinconstruction.com\"]}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ninth Circuit Finds that \u201cSubsidence Exclusion\u201d Bars Coverage for Landslide Loss - Advise &amp; Consult, Inc.","description":"finding that a liability policy\u2019s \u201cSubsidence Exclusion\u201d barred coverage for a lawsuit arising out of a landslide","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/subsidence-exclusion-bars-coverage\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ninth Circuit Finds that \u201cSubsidence Exclusion\u201d Bars Coverage for Landslide Loss - Advise &amp; Consult, Inc.","og_description":"finding that a liability policy\u2019s \u201cSubsidence Exclusion\u201d barred coverage for a lawsuit arising out of a landslide","og_url":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/subsidence-exclusion-bars-coverage\/","og_site_name":"Advise &amp; Consult, Inc.","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Advise-Consult-Inc-126949043996790\/","article_published_time":"2022-04-05T21:43:15+00:00","article_modified_time":"2022-04-05T21:43:18+00:00","og_image":[{"url":"https:\/\/www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/11\/2022\/03\/landslide.jpg","type":"","width":"","height":""}],"author":"admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@adviseconsult","twitter_site":"@adviseconsult","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"admin","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/subsidence-exclusion-bars-coverage\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/subsidence-exclusion-bars-coverage\/"},"author":{"name":"admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/0a11abe008083d5fb19c2b0feefe7bd7"},"headline":"Ninth Circuit Finds that \u201cSubsidence Exclusion\u201d Bars Coverage for Landslide Loss","datePublished":"2022-04-05T21:43:15+00:00","dateModified":"2022-04-05T21:43:18+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/subsidence-exclusion-bars-coverage\/"},"wordCount":543,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/subsidence-exclusion-bars-coverage\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/11\/2022\/03\/landslide.jpg","keywords":["Advise &amp; Consult","Landslide","Subsidence Exclusion"],"articleSection":["Property Insurance Claims"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/subsidence-exclusion-bars-coverage\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/subsidence-exclusion-bars-coverage\/","url":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/subsidence-exclusion-bars-coverage\/","name":"Ninth Circuit Finds that \u201cSubsidence Exclusion\u201d Bars Coverage for Landslide Loss - Advise &amp; Consult, Inc.","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/subsidence-exclusion-bars-coverage\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/subsidence-exclusion-bars-coverage\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/11\/2022\/03\/landslide.jpg","datePublished":"2022-04-05T21:43:15+00:00","dateModified":"2022-04-05T21:43:18+00:00","description":"finding that a liability policy\u2019s \u201cSubsidence Exclusion\u201d barred coverage for a lawsuit arising out of a landslide","inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/subsidence-exclusion-bars-coverage\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/subsidence-exclusion-bars-coverage\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/11\/2022\/03\/landslide.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/11\/2022\/03\/landslide.jpg"},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/","name":"Advise &amp; Consult, Inc.","description":"Construction Expert Witnesses","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#organization","name":"Advise & Consult","url":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/AC-Red-Logo.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/AC-Red-Logo.png","width":162,"height":75,"caption":"Advise & Consult"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Advise-Consult-Inc-126949043996790\/","https:\/\/x.com\/adviseconsult","https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company-beta\/204526\/","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/user\/MrConstructionExpert"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/0a11abe008083d5fb19c2b0feefe7bd7","name":"admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/b01e71b7acadd7657af782b7ad1a30cc?s=96&d=mm&r=pg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/b01e71b7acadd7657af782b7ad1a30cc?s=96&d=mm&r=pg","caption":"admin"},"sameAs":["http:\/\/www.expertwitnessinconstruction.com"]}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p2ztG6-3M4B","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/899781","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=899781"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/899781\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":899782,"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/899781\/revisions\/899782"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=899781"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=899781"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=899781"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}