{"id":901252,"date":"2023-06-06T12:36:53","date_gmt":"2023-06-06T18:36:53","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/?p=901252"},"modified":"2023-06-06T12:36:58","modified_gmt":"2023-06-06T18:36:58","slug":"presuit-notice-florida-appellate-court","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/presuit-notice-florida-appellate-court\/","title":{"rendered":"A Matter of Means and Methods: Florida Appellate Court Upholds Retroactive Presuit Notice Requirement"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>Vincent Fernandez and Shaheen Nouri | <a href=\"https:\/\/www.butler.legal\/a-matter-of-means-and-methods-florida-appellate-court-upholds-retroactive-presuit-notice-requirement\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener nofollow\">Butler Weihmuller Katz Craig<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\">The presuit notice requirements of section 627.70152, Florida Statutes, are procedural in nature and, therefore, apply retroactively to insurance policies existing at the time the law was enacted (July 1, 2021).&nbsp;&nbsp;<em>Herman Cole v. Universal Prop. &amp; Cas. Ins. Co.<\/em>, No. 4D22-1054 (Fla. 4th DCA May 3, 2023).<\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p>Florida\u2019s Fourth District Court of\u00a0Appeal\u00a0affirmed the trial court\u2019s dismissal of an insured\u2019s breach of contract action due to the insured\u2019s failure to file a formal notice of intent to initiate litigation against the carrier as required by the recent statute.\u00a0 The insured appealed the dismissal, claiming the new presuit notice requirement impaired his substantive rights under the insurance policy.\u00a0 The District Court found the trial court\u2019s dismissal was not an error, and the trial court \u201ccorrectly determined that requiring enforcement of the legislatively enacted presuit notice requirements did not impair appellant\u2019s substantive rights[.]\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In&nbsp;<em>Cole<\/em>, the insured sued his homeowners\u2019 insurance carrier claiming breach of contract.&nbsp; The insured submitted his insurance claim prior to the effective date of section 627.70152, Florida Statutes (July 1, 2021).&nbsp; However, the insured did not sue his carrier until&nbsp;<em>after<\/em>&nbsp;July 1, 2021.&nbsp; As a&nbsp;<em>condition<\/em>&nbsp;<em>precedent<\/em>&nbsp;to filing a lawsuit against a carrier, this statute requires an insured to provide the Florida Department of Financial Services with notice of&nbsp;his\/her intent to initiate litigation.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In response to the carrier\u2019s motion to dismiss, the insured argued that his case was analogous to&nbsp;<em>Menendez v. Progressive Express Ins. Co.<\/em>, 35 So. 3d 873 (Fla. 2010), involving an amendment to the Florida PIP statute which created several \u201cproblematic provisions,\u201d including the imposition of a penalty, changes that implicated attorney\u2019s fees, and imposed a presuit notice requirement.&nbsp; 35 So. 3d at 878. &nbsp;<em>Menendez<\/em>&nbsp;held that the entire amendment to the PIP statute, which in part included a statutory presuit notice requirement, was a substantive change that could not be applied retroactively to policies issued before the amendment\u2019s effective date.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The insured argued that section 627.70152, Florida Statutes, like the amendment to the PIP statute in&nbsp;<em>Menendez<\/em>, impaired his substantive rights by requiring that he provide presuit notice and by having a section which affected an insured\u2019s right to attorney\u2019s fees.&nbsp; The carrier argued the instant case was distinguishable from&nbsp;<em>Menendez<\/em>.&nbsp; The trial court granted the motion to dismiss and found that&nbsp;<em>Menendez<\/em>&nbsp;was distinguishable and that it was clear from the face of section 627.70152 that it was a procedural statute, and thus could be applied retroactively.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>On appeal, the district court analyzed the opinions from the Florida Supreme Court, including&nbsp;<em>State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Laforet<\/em>, 658 So. 2d 55, 61 (Fla. 1995),&nbsp;<em>Alamo Rent-A-Car, Inc. v. Mancusi<\/em>, 632 So. 2d 1352, 1358 (Fla. 1994), and&nbsp;<em>Have Fed. Sav. &amp; Loan Ass\u2019n v. Kirian<\/em>, 579 So. 2d 730, 732 (Fla. 1991), to delineate the differences between a&nbsp;<em>substantive<\/em>&nbsp;statute and a&nbsp;<em>procedural<\/em>&nbsp;statute. &nbsp;Summarily, a substantive law prescribes duties and rights as opposed to a procedural law which pertains to the means and methods to apply and enforce those duties and rights.&nbsp; A substantive statute will not operate retrospectively absent clear legislative intent to the contrary, but a procedural or remedial statute will operate retrospectively.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The court then turned to the issue of whether section 627.70152 would apply retroactively to policies in existence prior to the effective date of July 1, 2021.&nbsp; The court applied a two-part test.&nbsp; The test first requires the Court to determine whether the Legislature intended for the statute to apply retroactively.&nbsp; Then, if legislative intent is clearly expressed, the Court must determine whether retroactive application would violate any constitutional principles (in this case, whether retroactive application would attach new legal consequences to events completed prior to enactment).&nbsp;<em>Cole<\/em>&nbsp;(quoting&nbsp;<em>Metro. Dade County v. Chase Fed. Hous. Corp.<\/em>, 737 So. 2d 494, 499 (Fla. 1999)).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In applying this two-part test outlined in&nbsp;<em>Menendez<\/em>, the court disagreed with the insured\u2019s position that the statute would not apply retroactively to an insurance policy already existing at the time of enactment. &nbsp;The court examined the language of Section 627.70152(1), Florida Statutes (2021), which begins by stating that \u201c[t]his section applies exclusively to all suits\u2026arising under a residential or commercial property insurance policy\u2026\u201d&nbsp; The court emphasized the fact that the statute \u201cimposes a presuit notice requirement as a condition precedent to filing suit\u201d and requires a court to \u201cdismiss without prejudice any claimant\u2019s suit relating to a claim for which a notice of intent to initiate litigation was not given as required by [the statute].\u201d&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The court further held that \u201c[if] the legislature had intended to limit this presuit notice provision to policies issued after the statute\u2019s effective date, the legislature would have included language stating so.\u201d&nbsp; Based upon the foregoing, the court held that the presuit notice requirements of Section 627.70152, Florida Statutes, are retroactive, procedural, and apply to insurance policies existing at the time the law was enacted (July 1, 2021).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The court also disagreed with the insured\u2019s argument that, because Section 627.70152 changed the manner in which attorney\u2019s fees are awarded, the statute impaired substantive rights. &nbsp;The court found that the subsection related to attorney\u2019s fees was not implicated in the case at bar.&nbsp; Nevertheless, the court held that, even if attorney\u2019s fees were at issue, just because the right to attorney\u2019s fees is substantive and cannot be applied retroactively does not mean that the presuit notice provision \u2013 in a separate subsection \u2013 also cannot be applied retroactively.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The Fourth District Court of Appeal\u00a0has jurisdiction over Florida\u2019s Fifteenth, Seventeenth, and Nineteenth Judicial Circuits (trial courts), which are composed of Palm Beach, Broward, St. Lucie, Martin, Indian River, and Okeechobee Counties.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>When one of your cases is in need of a construction expert, estimates, insurance appraisal or umpire services in defect or insurance disputes &#8211; please call Advise &amp; Consult, Inc. at 888.684.8305, or email <a href=\"mailto:experts@adviseandconsult.net\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">experts@adviseandconsult.net<\/a>.<\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Vincent Fernandez and Shaheen Nouri | Butler Weihmuller Katz Craig The presuit notice requirements of section 627.70152, Florida Statutes, are procedural in nature and, therefore, apply retroactively to insurance policies existing at the time the law was enacted (July 1, 2021).&nbsp;&nbsp;Herman Cole v. Universal Prop. &amp; Cas. Ins. Co., No. 4D22-1054 (Fla. 4th DCA May&hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/presuit-notice-florida-appellate-court\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">A Matter of Means and Methods: Florida Appellate Court Upholds Retroactive Presuit Notice Requirement<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[10721],"tags":[9895,94,22,11902],"class_list":["post-901252","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-insurance","tag-advise-consult","tag-florida","tag-insurance","tag-presuit-notice","entry"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v25.0 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>A Matter of Means and Methods: Florida Appellate Court Upholds Retroactive Presuit Notice Requirement - Advise &amp; Consult, Inc.<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"trial court \u201ccorrectly ruled requiring enforcement of enacted presuit notice requirements didn&#039;t impair appellant\u2019s substantive rights.\u201d\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/presuit-notice-florida-appellate-court\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"A Matter of Means and Methods: Florida Appellate Court Upholds Retroactive Presuit Notice Requirement - Advise &amp; Consult, Inc.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"trial court \u201ccorrectly ruled requiring enforcement of enacted presuit notice requirements didn&#039;t impair appellant\u2019s substantive rights.\u201d\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/presuit-notice-florida-appellate-court\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Advise &amp; Consult, Inc.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Advise-Consult-Inc-126949043996790\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2023-06-06T18:36:53+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2023-06-06T18:36:58+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@adviseconsult\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@adviseconsult\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/presuit-notice-florida-appellate-court\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/presuit-notice-florida-appellate-court\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/0a11abe008083d5fb19c2b0feefe7bd7\"},\"headline\":\"A Matter of Means and Methods: Florida Appellate Court Upholds Retroactive Presuit Notice Requirement\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-06-06T18:36:53+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-06-06T18:36:58+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/presuit-notice-florida-appellate-court\/\"},\"wordCount\":1028,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#organization\"},\"keywords\":[\"Advise &amp; Consult\",\"Florida\",\"insurance\",\"Presuit Notice\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Insurance\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/presuit-notice-florida-appellate-court\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/presuit-notice-florida-appellate-court\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/presuit-notice-florida-appellate-court\/\",\"name\":\"A Matter of Means and Methods: Florida Appellate Court Upholds Retroactive Presuit Notice Requirement - Advise &amp; Consult, Inc.\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2023-06-06T18:36:53+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-06-06T18:36:58+00:00\",\"description\":\"trial court \u201ccorrectly ruled requiring enforcement of enacted presuit notice requirements didn't impair appellant\u2019s substantive rights.\u201d\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/presuit-notice-florida-appellate-court\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"Advise &amp; Consult, Inc.\",\"description\":\"Construction Expert Witnesses\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Advise & Consult\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/AC-Red-Logo.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/AC-Red-Logo.png\",\"width\":162,\"height\":75,\"caption\":\"Advise & Consult\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Advise-Consult-Inc-126949043996790\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/adviseconsult\",\"https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company-beta\/204526\/\",\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/user\/MrConstructionExpert\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/0a11abe008083d5fb19c2b0feefe7bd7\",\"name\":\"admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/b01e71b7acadd7657af782b7ad1a30cc?s=96&d=mm&r=pg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/b01e71b7acadd7657af782b7ad1a30cc?s=96&d=mm&r=pg\",\"caption\":\"admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"http:\/\/www.expertwitnessinconstruction.com\"]}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"A Matter of Means and Methods: Florida Appellate Court Upholds Retroactive Presuit Notice Requirement - Advise &amp; Consult, Inc.","description":"trial court \u201ccorrectly ruled requiring enforcement of enacted presuit notice requirements didn't impair appellant\u2019s substantive rights.\u201d","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/presuit-notice-florida-appellate-court\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"A Matter of Means and Methods: Florida Appellate Court Upholds Retroactive Presuit Notice Requirement - Advise &amp; Consult, Inc.","og_description":"trial court \u201ccorrectly ruled requiring enforcement of enacted presuit notice requirements didn't impair appellant\u2019s substantive rights.\u201d","og_url":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/presuit-notice-florida-appellate-court\/","og_site_name":"Advise &amp; Consult, Inc.","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Advise-Consult-Inc-126949043996790\/","article_published_time":"2023-06-06T18:36:53+00:00","article_modified_time":"2023-06-06T18:36:58+00:00","author":"admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@adviseconsult","twitter_site":"@adviseconsult","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/presuit-notice-florida-appellate-court\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/presuit-notice-florida-appellate-court\/"},"author":{"name":"admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/0a11abe008083d5fb19c2b0feefe7bd7"},"headline":"A Matter of Means and Methods: Florida Appellate Court Upholds Retroactive Presuit Notice Requirement","datePublished":"2023-06-06T18:36:53+00:00","dateModified":"2023-06-06T18:36:58+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/presuit-notice-florida-appellate-court\/"},"wordCount":1028,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#organization"},"keywords":["Advise &amp; Consult","Florida","insurance","Presuit Notice"],"articleSection":["Insurance"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/presuit-notice-florida-appellate-court\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/presuit-notice-florida-appellate-court\/","url":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/presuit-notice-florida-appellate-court\/","name":"A Matter of Means and Methods: Florida Appellate Court Upholds Retroactive Presuit Notice Requirement - Advise &amp; Consult, Inc.","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2023-06-06T18:36:53+00:00","dateModified":"2023-06-06T18:36:58+00:00","description":"trial court \u201ccorrectly ruled requiring enforcement of enacted presuit notice requirements didn't impair appellant\u2019s substantive rights.\u201d","inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/presuit-notice-florida-appellate-court\/"]}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/","name":"Advise &amp; Consult, Inc.","description":"Construction Expert Witnesses","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#organization","name":"Advise & Consult","url":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/AC-Red-Logo.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/AC-Red-Logo.png","width":162,"height":75,"caption":"Advise & Consult"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Advise-Consult-Inc-126949043996790\/","https:\/\/x.com\/adviseconsult","https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company-beta\/204526\/","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/user\/MrConstructionExpert"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/0a11abe008083d5fb19c2b0feefe7bd7","name":"admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/b01e71b7acadd7657af782b7ad1a30cc?s=96&d=mm&r=pg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/b01e71b7acadd7657af782b7ad1a30cc?s=96&d=mm&r=pg","caption":"admin"},"sameAs":["http:\/\/www.expertwitnessinconstruction.com"]}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p2ztG6-3Msk","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/901252","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=901252"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/901252\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":901253,"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/901252\/revisions\/901253"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=901252"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=901252"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=901252"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}