{"id":903057,"date":"2024-07-25T15:17:15","date_gmt":"2024-07-25T21:17:15","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/?p=903057"},"modified":"2024-07-25T15:17:17","modified_gmt":"2024-07-25T21:17:17","slug":"hail-claims-problems-part-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/hail-claims-problems-part-2\/","title":{"rendered":"The Problem(s) With Hail Claims \u2013 Part 2"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>Bill Wilson | <a href=\"https:\/\/www.claimsjournal.com\/news\/national\/2024\/06\/28\/324727.htm\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener nofollow\">Claims Journal<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In <a href=\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/hail-damage-problem-with-hail-claims-part-1\/\">last month\u2019s column<\/a>, we began our examination of hail and windstorm claims issues by focusing on the pervasive problem of whether delayed discovery and reporting of hail damage meets the conditional requirements of most homeowners policies to report damage promptly or as soon as practicable.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In this issue, we\u2019ll examine other hail damage issues such as actual cash value vs. replacement cost policy provisions, percentage deductibles, and special cosmetic damage exclusions, as well as existing \u201cmarring\u201d exclusions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Actual Cash Value vs. Replacement Cost<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>While this issue appears to be more pervasive in commercial lines, as opposed to personal lines policies, some carriers have introduced actual cash value (ACV) endorsements for roofs or roof coverings because of increasingly poor loss experience with wind and hailstorms, as exacerbated by the vulnerability, in particular, of asphalt shingle roofs. In some cases, these endorsements may be removed, usually for additional premium, but that may not be the case in excess and surplus (E&amp;S) markets or other markets of last resort.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>That being said, though, on this issue I\u2019d rather focus on dispelling the all-too-common myth that a roof must be replaced within 180 days of the loss in order to receive replacement cost, rather than ACV, coverage. For example, a commercial insured (multiple condo buildings) experienced a hailstorm in May but was not aware of the damage until February when a claim was filed. The insurer admitted coverage but said only the ACV of the damage was covered because replacement cost coverage was not requested within 180 days of loss.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>This is the actual governing language in the policy form [<strong>emphasis<\/strong>&nbsp;added]:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><em>\u201cYou may make a claim for loss or damage covered by this insurance on an actual cash value basis&nbsp;<strong>instead of a replacement cost basis<\/strong>. In the event&nbsp;<strong>you elect to have loss or damage settled on an actual cash value basis<\/strong>, you may still make a claim for the additional coverage this [coverage] provides if you notify us of your intent to do so within 180 days after the loss or damage.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>For this policy provision to be correctly applied, one must follow the \u201cRTFP!\u201d principle and read the provision carefully. Yes, there is a 180-day (from the date of the loss) conditional requirement to get replacement cost coverage, BUT only if the insured initially \u201celects to have loss or damage settled on an actual cash value basis,\u201d \u201cinstead of a replacement cost basis.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In this case, the insured never elected ACV instead of replacement cost. He requested recovery on a replacement cost basis, as provided by the policy. Therefore, the 180-day condition is never triggered.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In addition, to dispel another myth, nothing in this language, or similar language in other policies, requires that replacement actually take place within 180 days of the loss. In some cases, such timely replacement is not possible, nor do most policies require it. The insured must simply express, within 180 days of loss, an \u201cintent\u201d to recover on a replacement cost basis.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Percentage Deductibles<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>A number of carriers have introduced windstorm or hail percentage deductible endorsements, though predominantly so far in commercial lines. These deductibles typically range from 2% to 5%. That doesn\u2019t sound like much of a retention, but when a single multi-family apartment or condo building roof costs an average of $250,000 or more to replace following a storm that may impact multiple buildings in a complex, the result may be a very high retention. One of the primary purposes of a deductible is to encourage loss prevention by insureds, but there\u2019s not much insureds can do about the weather other than talk about it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Cosmetic Damage Endorsements and Marring Exclusions<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Both ISO and AAIS have introduced endorsements providing an option for recovery on an ACV basis and\/or an outright exclusion for \u201ccosmetic\u201d damage. By \u201ccosmetic,\u201d these forms essentially mean damage that consists only of marring, pitting or other superficial damage, but not structural damage or damage that inhibits the property from continuing to serve as a weather barrier.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Even without these endorsements, I\u2019ve come across instances where claims were denied because damage was not structural, even though damage, as traditionally considered, means any reduction in value beyond the policy deductible.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Courts generally do not look favorably on such restrictive interpretations of \u201cdamage.\u201d A case in point is Welton Enterprises, Inc. v. Cincinnati Ins. Co., 131 F. Supp. 3d 827, 834 (W.D. Wis. 2015) where the court found that cosmetic damage may constitute \u201cdirect physical loss\u201d absent any more restrictive language.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In addition, some of these denials erroneously focus on \u201cmarring\u201d exclusions but when you examine these exclusions, you typically find them within a series of exclusions that involve damage that occurs over an extended period of time, usually through normal use.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>A notable contract interpretation rule is noscitur a sociis, a Latin term meaning \u201cit is known by its associates.\u201d Applying this principle, the meaning of an unclear or ambiguous term can be determined by considering the other terms in which it is listed. I elaborate on this and other interpretative principles in my book,<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u201cWhen Words Collide: Resolving Insurance Coverage and Claims Disputes.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>But, again, it is important to read the policy carefully. For example, one proprietary dwelling policy actually defined \u201cmarring\u201d to mean [<strong>emphasis<\/strong>&nbsp;added]:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><em>\u201c\u2026 any disfigurement, blemish, discoloration, weathering, or stretching, or the like \u2026 including, but not limited to, scratching, denting, creasing, gouging, fading, staining, tearing, oxidizing, blistering, or thinning,&nbsp;<strong>whether occurring at once or over time<\/strong>.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Well, while I had originally intended to cover this topic in two articles, we\u2019ve run out of space in this issue and there are still important considerations such as matching issues, Pair Or Set clauses, suits against the insurer, and potential solutions to all of these issues. So, tune in next month to <a href=\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/hail-claims-problems-part-3\/\">Part 3<\/a> of this series.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>When one of your cases is in need of a construction expert, estimates, insurance appraisal or umpire services in defect or insurance disputes &#8211; please call Advise &amp; Consult, Inc. at 888.684.8305, or email <a href=\"mailto:experts@adviseandconsult.net\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener nofollow\">experts@adviseandconsult.net<\/a>.<\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Bill Wilson | Claims Journal In last month\u2019s column, we began our examination of hail and windstorm claims issues by focusing on the pervasive problem of whether delayed discovery and reporting of hail damage meets the conditional requirements of most homeowners policies to report damage promptly or as soon as practicable. In this issue, we\u2019ll&hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/hail-claims-problems-part-2\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">The Problem(s) With Hail Claims \u2013 Part 2<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[10721],"tags":[9895,6482,22],"class_list":["post-903057","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-insurance","tag-advise-consult","tag-hail","tag-insurance","entry"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v25.0 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>The Problem(s) With Hail Claims \u2013 Part 2 - Advise &amp; Consult, Inc.<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"hail damage issues such as actual cash value vs. replacement cost policy provisions, percentage deductibles, and cosmetic damage exclusions\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/hail-claims-problems-part-2\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"The Problem(s) With Hail Claims \u2013 Part 2 - Advise &amp; Consult, Inc.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"hail damage issues such as actual cash value vs. replacement cost policy provisions, percentage deductibles, and cosmetic damage exclusions\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/hail-claims-problems-part-2\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Advise &amp; Consult, Inc.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Advise-Consult-Inc-126949043996790\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-07-25T21:17:15+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-07-25T21:17:17+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@adviseconsult\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@adviseconsult\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/hail-claims-problems-part-2\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/hail-claims-problems-part-2\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/0a11abe008083d5fb19c2b0feefe7bd7\"},\"headline\":\"The Problem(s) With Hail Claims \u2013 Part 2\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-07-25T21:17:15+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-07-25T21:17:17+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/hail-claims-problems-part-2\/\"},\"wordCount\":1017,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#organization\"},\"keywords\":[\"Advise &amp; Consult\",\"Hail\",\"insurance\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Insurance\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/hail-claims-problems-part-2\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/hail-claims-problems-part-2\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/hail-claims-problems-part-2\/\",\"name\":\"The Problem(s) With Hail Claims \u2013 Part 2 - Advise &amp; Consult, Inc.\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2024-07-25T21:17:15+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-07-25T21:17:17+00:00\",\"description\":\"hail damage issues such as actual cash value vs. replacement cost policy provisions, percentage deductibles, and cosmetic damage exclusions\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/hail-claims-problems-part-2\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"Advise &amp; Consult, Inc.\",\"description\":\"Construction Expert Witnesses\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Advise & Consult\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/AC-Red-Logo.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/AC-Red-Logo.png\",\"width\":162,\"height\":75,\"caption\":\"Advise & Consult\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Advise-Consult-Inc-126949043996790\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/adviseconsult\",\"https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company-beta\/204526\/\",\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/user\/MrConstructionExpert\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/0a11abe008083d5fb19c2b0feefe7bd7\",\"name\":\"admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/b01e71b7acadd7657af782b7ad1a30cc?s=96&d=mm&r=pg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/b01e71b7acadd7657af782b7ad1a30cc?s=96&d=mm&r=pg\",\"caption\":\"admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"http:\/\/www.expertwitnessinconstruction.com\"]}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"The Problem(s) With Hail Claims \u2013 Part 2 - Advise &amp; Consult, Inc.","description":"hail damage issues such as actual cash value vs. replacement cost policy provisions, percentage deductibles, and cosmetic damage exclusions","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/hail-claims-problems-part-2\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"The Problem(s) With Hail Claims \u2013 Part 2 - Advise &amp; Consult, Inc.","og_description":"hail damage issues such as actual cash value vs. replacement cost policy provisions, percentage deductibles, and cosmetic damage exclusions","og_url":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/hail-claims-problems-part-2\/","og_site_name":"Advise &amp; Consult, Inc.","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Advise-Consult-Inc-126949043996790\/","article_published_time":"2024-07-25T21:17:15+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-07-25T21:17:17+00:00","author":"admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@adviseconsult","twitter_site":"@adviseconsult","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/hail-claims-problems-part-2\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/hail-claims-problems-part-2\/"},"author":{"name":"admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/0a11abe008083d5fb19c2b0feefe7bd7"},"headline":"The Problem(s) With Hail Claims \u2013 Part 2","datePublished":"2024-07-25T21:17:15+00:00","dateModified":"2024-07-25T21:17:17+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/hail-claims-problems-part-2\/"},"wordCount":1017,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#organization"},"keywords":["Advise &amp; Consult","Hail","insurance"],"articleSection":["Insurance"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/hail-claims-problems-part-2\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/hail-claims-problems-part-2\/","url":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/hail-claims-problems-part-2\/","name":"The Problem(s) With Hail Claims \u2013 Part 2 - Advise &amp; Consult, Inc.","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2024-07-25T21:17:15+00:00","dateModified":"2024-07-25T21:17:17+00:00","description":"hail damage issues such as actual cash value vs. replacement cost policy provisions, percentage deductibles, and cosmetic damage exclusions","inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/hail-claims-problems-part-2\/"]}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/","name":"Advise &amp; Consult, Inc.","description":"Construction Expert Witnesses","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#organization","name":"Advise & Consult","url":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/AC-Red-Logo.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/AC-Red-Logo.png","width":162,"height":75,"caption":"Advise & Consult"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Advise-Consult-Inc-126949043996790\/","https:\/\/x.com\/adviseconsult","https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company-beta\/204526\/","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/user\/MrConstructionExpert"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/0a11abe008083d5fb19c2b0feefe7bd7","name":"admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/b01e71b7acadd7657af782b7ad1a30cc?s=96&d=mm&r=pg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/b01e71b7acadd7657af782b7ad1a30cc?s=96&d=mm&r=pg","caption":"admin"},"sameAs":["http:\/\/www.expertwitnessinconstruction.com"]}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p2ztG6-3MVr","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/903057","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=903057"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/903057\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":903059,"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/903057\/revisions\/903059"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=903057"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=903057"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=903057"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}