{"id":905192,"date":"2025-12-31T15:51:25","date_gmt":"2025-12-31T22:51:25","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/?p=905192"},"modified":"2025-12-31T15:51:30","modified_gmt":"2025-12-31T22:51:30","slug":"duty-to-defend-based-on-allegations-against-insured","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/duty-to-defend-based-on-allegations-against-insured\/","title":{"rendered":"Insured&#8217;s Motion To Stay Coverage Action Denied Where Duty To Defend Is Based On Allegations Against Insured"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>Lauren Maldanado | <a href=\"https:\/\/www.executivesummaryblog.com\/insureds-motion-to-stay-coverage-action-denied-where-duty-to-defend-is-based-on-allegations-against-insured\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener nofollow\">Wiley<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, applying Illinois law, denied an insured\u2019s motion to stay an insurer\u2019s declaratory judgment action seeking a declaration that it owed no <a href=\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/tag\/duty-to-defend-2\/\">duty to defend<\/a>.\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.executivesummaryblog.com\/assets\/htmldocuments\/Landmark%20American%20Insurance%20Company%20v.%20Reproductive%20Genetics%20Institute%20Inc.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener nofollow\"><em>Landmark Am. Ins. Co. v. Reprod. Genetics Inst. Inc.<\/em>, 2025 WL 2855214 (N.D. Ill. Oct. 8, 2025)<\/a>. The court concluded that there were no \u201cultimate facts\u201d to be litigated in the insurer\u2019s action requiring a stay because the duty to defend could be determined by looking at the allegations of the complaint and assessing whether \u201cif proven, those allegations would establish an injury that the policy would cover.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The insurer sought a declaration that it had no duty to defend with respect to a class action lawsuit filed against its insured. The class action complaint alleged that the insured engaged in false and deceptive advertising regarding certain genetic testing and failed to fully disclose the accuracy of such testing. It alleged causes of actions under Illinois\u2019s Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act and Uniform Deceptive Trade Practices Act, as well as breaches of various warranties.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The policy included Medical Professional Liability coverage, which excluded claims arising out of dishonest acts, and Commercial General Liability coverage, which excluded personal and advertising injury arising out of a breach of contract and five specific offenses.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In deciding whether to grant the insured\u2019s motion to stay, the court determined that the key issue was whether it could \u201cgrant declaratory relief without deciding issues of ultimate fact.\u201d The court stated that, under Illinois law, \u201cdeclaratory complaints regarding insurance coverage are \u2018premature\u2019 when they present issues of \u2018ultimate facts\u2019 which would otherwise be resolved in the pending litigation,\u201d such as mental culpability.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>With respect to the duty to defend, the court explained that courts ordinarily look to the allegations made against the insured in the underlying lawsuit, and decide whether, if true, the allegations would implicate coverage. In doing so, the underlying facts are often irrelevant. The court applied this rule and explained first, with respect to the Medical Professional Liability coverage exclusion, that \u201cliability coverage exclusion for claims arising out of dishonest acts does not require a determination of dishonesty.\u201d Similarly, with respect to the Commercial General Liability coverage exclusion, the court stated that \u201c[w]hether the underlying complaint alleges any . . . injury that would take it within the purview of the policy doesn\u2019t require a decision that the injury occurred.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Ultimately, the court held that there was no need to \u201clook beyond the eight corners of the insurance policy and the underlying lawsuit to conclude that there is no ultimate fact at issue.\u201d Whether the insured is actually guilty of the conduct alleged in the underlying lawsuit, the court reasoned, has no relevance to whether the insurer had a duty to defend. The court therefore denied the motion to stay and allowed the case to proceed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>When one of your cases is in need of a construction expert, estimates, insurance appraisal or umpire services in defect or insurance disputes &#8211; please call Advise &amp; Consult, Inc. at 888.684.8305, or email <a href=\"mailto:experts@adviseandconsult.net\">experts@adviseandconsult.net<\/a>.<\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Lauren Maldanado | Wiley The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, applying Illinois law, denied an insured\u2019s motion to stay an insurer\u2019s declaratory judgment action seeking a declaration that it owed no duty to defend.\u00a0Landmark Am. Ins. Co. v. Reprod. Genetics Inst. Inc., 2025 WL 2855214 (N.D. Ill. Oct. 8, 2025). The&hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/duty-to-defend-based-on-allegations-against-insured\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Insured&#8217;s Motion To Stay Coverage Action Denied Where Duty To Defend Is Based On Allegations Against Insured<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[10],"tags":[9895,57,6647],"class_list":["post-905192","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-duty-to-defend","tag-advise-consult","tag-duty-to-defend-2","tag-illinois","entry"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v25.0 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Insured&#039;s Motion To Stay Coverage Action Denied Where Duty To Defend Is Based On Allegations Against Insured - Advise &amp; Consult, Inc.<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"denied an insured\u2019s motion to stay an insurer\u2019s declaratory judgment action seeking a declaration that it owed no duty to defend\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/duty-to-defend-based-on-allegations-against-insured\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Insured&#039;s Motion To Stay Coverage Action Denied Where Duty To Defend Is Based On Allegations Against Insured - Advise &amp; Consult, Inc.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"denied an insured\u2019s motion to stay an insurer\u2019s declaratory judgment action seeking a declaration that it owed no duty to defend\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/duty-to-defend-based-on-allegations-against-insured\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Advise &amp; Consult, Inc.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Advise-Consult-Inc-126949043996790\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-12-31T22:51:25+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-12-31T22:51:30+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@adviseconsult\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@adviseconsult\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/duty-to-defend-based-on-allegations-against-insured\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/duty-to-defend-based-on-allegations-against-insured\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/0a11abe008083d5fb19c2b0feefe7bd7\"},\"headline\":\"Insured&#8217;s Motion To Stay Coverage Action Denied Where Duty To Defend Is Based On Allegations Against Insured\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-12-31T22:51:25+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-12-31T22:51:30+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/duty-to-defend-based-on-allegations-against-insured\/\"},\"wordCount\":537,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#organization\"},\"keywords\":[\"Advise &amp; Consult\",\"duty to defend\",\"Illinois\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Duty to Defend\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/duty-to-defend-based-on-allegations-against-insured\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/duty-to-defend-based-on-allegations-against-insured\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/duty-to-defend-based-on-allegations-against-insured\/\",\"name\":\"Insured's Motion To Stay Coverage Action Denied Where Duty To Defend Is Based On Allegations Against Insured - Advise &amp; Consult, Inc.\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2025-12-31T22:51:25+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-12-31T22:51:30+00:00\",\"description\":\"denied an insured\u2019s motion to stay an insurer\u2019s declaratory judgment action seeking a declaration that it owed no duty to defend\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/duty-to-defend-based-on-allegations-against-insured\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"Advise &amp; Consult, Inc.\",\"description\":\"Construction Expert Witnesses\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Advise & Consult\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/AC-Red-Logo.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/AC-Red-Logo.png\",\"width\":162,\"height\":75,\"caption\":\"Advise & Consult\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Advise-Consult-Inc-126949043996790\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/adviseconsult\",\"https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company-beta\/204526\/\",\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/user\/MrConstructionExpert\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/0a11abe008083d5fb19c2b0feefe7bd7\",\"name\":\"admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/b01e71b7acadd7657af782b7ad1a30cc?s=96&d=mm&r=pg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/b01e71b7acadd7657af782b7ad1a30cc?s=96&d=mm&r=pg\",\"caption\":\"admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"http:\/\/www.expertwitnessinconstruction.com\"]}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Insured's Motion To Stay Coverage Action Denied Where Duty To Defend Is Based On Allegations Against Insured - Advise &amp; Consult, Inc.","description":"denied an insured\u2019s motion to stay an insurer\u2019s declaratory judgment action seeking a declaration that it owed no duty to defend","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/duty-to-defend-based-on-allegations-against-insured\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Insured's Motion To Stay Coverage Action Denied Where Duty To Defend Is Based On Allegations Against Insured - Advise &amp; Consult, Inc.","og_description":"denied an insured\u2019s motion to stay an insurer\u2019s declaratory judgment action seeking a declaration that it owed no duty to defend","og_url":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/duty-to-defend-based-on-allegations-against-insured\/","og_site_name":"Advise &amp; Consult, Inc.","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Advise-Consult-Inc-126949043996790\/","article_published_time":"2025-12-31T22:51:25+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-12-31T22:51:30+00:00","author":"admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@adviseconsult","twitter_site":"@adviseconsult","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"admin","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/duty-to-defend-based-on-allegations-against-insured\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/duty-to-defend-based-on-allegations-against-insured\/"},"author":{"name":"admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/0a11abe008083d5fb19c2b0feefe7bd7"},"headline":"Insured&#8217;s Motion To Stay Coverage Action Denied Where Duty To Defend Is Based On Allegations Against Insured","datePublished":"2025-12-31T22:51:25+00:00","dateModified":"2025-12-31T22:51:30+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/duty-to-defend-based-on-allegations-against-insured\/"},"wordCount":537,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#organization"},"keywords":["Advise &amp; Consult","duty to defend","Illinois"],"articleSection":["Duty to Defend"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/duty-to-defend-based-on-allegations-against-insured\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/duty-to-defend-based-on-allegations-against-insured\/","url":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/duty-to-defend-based-on-allegations-against-insured\/","name":"Insured's Motion To Stay Coverage Action Denied Where Duty To Defend Is Based On Allegations Against Insured - Advise &amp; Consult, Inc.","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2025-12-31T22:51:25+00:00","dateModified":"2025-12-31T22:51:30+00:00","description":"denied an insured\u2019s motion to stay an insurer\u2019s declaratory judgment action seeking a declaration that it owed no duty to defend","inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/duty-to-defend-based-on-allegations-against-insured\/"]}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/","name":"Advise &amp; Consult, Inc.","description":"Construction Expert Witnesses","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#organization","name":"Advise & Consult","url":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/AC-Red-Logo.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/AC-Red-Logo.png","width":162,"height":75,"caption":"Advise & Consult"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Advise-Consult-Inc-126949043996790\/","https:\/\/x.com\/adviseconsult","https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company-beta\/204526\/","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/user\/MrConstructionExpert"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/0a11abe008083d5fb19c2b0feefe7bd7","name":"admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/b01e71b7acadd7657af782b7ad1a30cc?s=96&d=mm&r=pg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/b01e71b7acadd7657af782b7ad1a30cc?s=96&d=mm&r=pg","caption":"admin"},"sameAs":["http:\/\/www.expertwitnessinconstruction.com"]}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p2ztG6-3NtS","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/905192","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=905192"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/905192\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":905193,"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/905192\/revisions\/905193"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=905192"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=905192"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=905192"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}