{"id":905580,"date":"2026-04-21T15:41:43","date_gmt":"2026-04-21T21:41:43","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/?p=905580"},"modified":"2026-04-21T15:41:47","modified_gmt":"2026-04-21T21:41:47","slug":"constructive-notice-in-slip-and-fall-cases","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/constructive-notice-in-slip-and-fall-cases\/","title":{"rendered":"Supreme Court of Texas Reaffirms Strict Constructive\u2011Notice Standard in Slip\u2011and\u2011Fall Cases"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

Steven Moreno | Cozen O’Connor<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Overview<\/h4>\n\n\n\n

In a significant decision for premises owners and occupiers, the Supreme Court of Texas has reaffirmed (and strictly enforced) the evidentiary burden plaintiffs must meet to establish constructive notice<\/a> in slip\u2011and\u2011fall cases. In\u00a0H\u2011E\u2011B, L.P. v. Marissa Peterson<\/em><\/a>, the Court held that evidence of prior roof leaks elsewhere in a store, generalized inspection policies, or speculation about how a condition may have arisen cannot substitute for proof of how long the specific dangerous condition existed at the time and place of the injury.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The ruling reinforces a long\u2011standing but frequently litigated principle: without temporal evidence showing duration, a premises\u2011liability claim fails as a matter of law.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Factual Background<\/h4>\n\n\n\n

Marissa Peterson alleged she slipped and fell on a clear liquid puddle while shopping in the toy aisle of an H\u2011E\u2011B grocery store. She testified that after falling, she noticed water on the floor and observed water dripping from a ceiling rafter above the aisle. However, she had \u201cno idea\u201d how long the puddle had been present before she fell. Her companion initially said he saw water dripping from above the toy aisle about every ten or fifteen seconds, though he later recanted, admitting he had no idea where the water came from and assumed it was coming from the ceiling.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Peterson conceded she had no idea how long the puddle existed before her fall. Video evidence showed that rain in the area had stopped approximately two hours earlier and that no H\u2011E\u2011B employee had traversed the aisle during that time.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

H\u2011E\u2011B presented evidence that, although the store had experienced roof leaks in other areas during a remodeling project, there were no documented leaks above the toy aisle either before or after the incident.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Plaintiff\u2019s Position<\/h4>\n\n\n\n

Peterson acknowledged that she could not show H\u2011E\u2011B had actual knowledge of the puddle and instead relied on a constructive\u2011notice theory, arguing that the store\u2019s history of roof leaks during renovations, the size of the puddle, the alleged dripping from above, and earlier rain suggested the condition had existed long enough to be discovered. She further contended that H\u2011E\u2011B\u2019s heightened inspection protocols during rainstorms and the fact that no employee inspected the aisle for approximately two hours before her fall supported an inference of constructive knowledge.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

H\u2011E\u2011B\u2019s Position<\/h4>\n\n\n\n

H\u2011E\u2011B argued that Peterson failed to meet a threshold and core requirement of Texas premises\u2011liability law, specifically, evidence of duration. H\u2011E\u2011B argued there was no evidence showing when the puddle formed, that prior leaks elsewhere in the store were legally irrelevant to knowledge of a condition at a different location and time, and that evidence suggesting a possible cause of the puddle did not establish the duration of the dangerous condition itself.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Trial Court Ruling<\/h4>\n\n\n\n

The trial court granted summary judgment for H\u2011E\u2011B, concluding that Peterson failed to raise a fact issue on constructive notice. The court also excluded portions of Peterson\u2019s expert testimony.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Court of Appeals Ruling<\/h4>\n\n\n\n

The Thirteenth Court of Appeals reversed, holding that evidence of roof leaks elsewhere in the store, combined with Peterson\u2019s circumstantial evidence arguments, was sufficient to raise a fact issue on constructive knowledge (even without proof of duration at the specific aisle).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Supreme Court of Texas\u2019 Holding<\/h4>\n\n\n\n

The Supreme Court of Texas reversed the court of appeals and reinstated summary judgment for H\u2011E\u2011B.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Court held that constructive notice in slip\u2011and\u2011fall cases requires actual temporal evidence demonstrating that the alleged dangerous condition existed long enough for a premises owner to reasonably discover it. Evidence of prior leaks or maintenance issues elsewhere on the property is insufficient because notice must relate to the specific condition at the time and place of the injury, not to antecedent circumstances that may have caused it. Likewise, speculation about how a condition formed (such as recent rain, a suspected ceiling drip, the size of a puddle, or the existence of inspection protocols) does not<\/em> establish how long the condition existed. Nor do internal safety or inspection policies lower the plaintiff\u2019s burden. Absent evidence of duration, such policies do not create constructive notice. The Court emphasized that it has repeatedly rejected efforts to relax this evidentiary requirement in slip\u2011and\u2011fall cases, even where proof may be difficult to obtain.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Why This Decision Matters<\/h4>\n\n\n\n

This opinion is a strong reaffirmation of premises\u2011liability principles and has several important implications for future slip\u2011and\u2011fall litigation. The Supreme Court of Texas made clear that cases without real evidence showing how long a hazard existed should be resolved at the summary\u2011judgment stage, rather than sent to a jury. Plaintiffs cannot rely on general circumstances (like weather, prior maintenance issues, or a company\u2019s internal safety policies) to fill evidentiary gaps, and courts will not treat ordinary operational imperfections as proof that a business should have known about a short\u2011lived hazard.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Instead, the focus in slip-and-fall cases remains on whether the condition existed long enough to be discovered under the time-notice rule in Texas.<\/em> By reinforcing that duration, not speculation, is the decisive issue, Peterson<\/em> strengthens the ability of premises owners, occupiers, and insurers to defeat unsupported slip\u2011and\u2011fall claims at the summary judgment phase, even when the facts appear plausible, but are unsupported by evidence.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n

When one of your cases is in need of a construction expert, estimates, insurance appraisal or umpire services in defect or insurance disputes – please call Advise & Consult, Inc. at 801.641.8304, or email experts@adviseandconsult.net<\/a>.<\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Steven Moreno | Cozen O’Connor Overview In a significant decision for premises owners and occupiers, the Supreme Court of Texas has reaffirmed (and strictly enforced) the evidentiary burden plaintiffs must meet to establish constructive notice in slip\u2011and\u2011fall cases. In\u00a0H\u2011E\u2011B, L.P. v. Marissa Peterson, the Court held that evidence of prior roof leaks elsewhere in a… Continue reading Supreme Court of Texas Reaffirms Strict Constructive\u2011Notice Standard in Slip\u2011and\u2011Fall Cases<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[10721],"tags":[9895,11429,22,9832,6893],"class_list":["post-905580","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-insurance","tag-advise-consult","tag-constructive-notice","tag-insurance","tag-premisis-liability","tag-slip-and-fall","entry"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"yoast_head":"\nSupreme Court of Texas Reaffirms Strict Constructive\u2011Notice Standard in Slip\u2011and\u2011Fall Cases - Advise & Consult, Inc.<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Supreme Court of Texas has reaffirmed the evidentiary burden plaintiffs must meet to establish constructive notice in slip\u2011and\u2011fall cases\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/constructive-notice-in-slip-and-fall-cases\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Supreme Court of Texas Reaffirms Strict Constructive\u2011Notice Standard in Slip\u2011and\u2011Fall Cases - Advise & Consult, Inc.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Supreme Court of Texas has reaffirmed the evidentiary burden plaintiffs must meet to establish constructive notice in slip\u2011and\u2011fall cases\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/constructive-notice-in-slip-and-fall-cases\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Advise & Consult, Inc.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Advise-Consult-Inc-126949043996790\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-04-21T21:41:43+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-04-21T21:41:47+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@adviseconsult\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@adviseconsult\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/constructive-notice-in-slip-and-fall-cases\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/constructive-notice-in-slip-and-fall-cases\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/0a11abe008083d5fb19c2b0feefe7bd7\"},\"headline\":\"Supreme Court of Texas Reaffirms Strict Constructive\u2011Notice Standard in Slip\u2011and\u2011Fall Cases\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-04-21T21:41:43+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-04-21T21:41:47+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/constructive-notice-in-slip-and-fall-cases\/\"},\"wordCount\":959,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#organization\"},\"keywords\":[\"Advise & Consult\",\"Constructive Notice\",\"insurance\",\"Premisis Liability\",\"Slip and Fall\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Insurance\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/constructive-notice-in-slip-and-fall-cases\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/constructive-notice-in-slip-and-fall-cases\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/constructive-notice-in-slip-and-fall-cases\/\",\"name\":\"Supreme Court of Texas Reaffirms Strict Constructive\u2011Notice Standard in Slip\u2011and\u2011Fall Cases - Advise & Consult, Inc.\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-04-21T21:41:43+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-04-21T21:41:47+00:00\",\"description\":\"Supreme Court of Texas has reaffirmed the evidentiary burden plaintiffs must meet to establish constructive notice in slip\u2011and\u2011fall cases\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/constructive-notice-in-slip-and-fall-cases\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"Advise & Consult, Inc.\",\"description\":\"Construction Expert Witnesses\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Advise & Consult\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/AC-Red-Logo.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/AC-Red-Logo.png\",\"width\":162,\"height\":75,\"caption\":\"Advise & Consult\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Advise-Consult-Inc-126949043996790\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/adviseconsult\",\"https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company-beta\/204526\/\",\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/user\/MrConstructionExpert\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/0a11abe008083d5fb19c2b0feefe7bd7\",\"name\":\"admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/b01e71b7acadd7657af782b7ad1a30cc?s=96&d=mm&r=pg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/b01e71b7acadd7657af782b7ad1a30cc?s=96&d=mm&r=pg\",\"caption\":\"admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"http:\/\/www.expertwitnessinconstruction.com\"]}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Supreme Court of Texas Reaffirms Strict Constructive\u2011Notice Standard in Slip\u2011and\u2011Fall Cases - Advise & Consult, Inc.","description":"Supreme Court of Texas has reaffirmed the evidentiary burden plaintiffs must meet to establish constructive notice in slip\u2011and\u2011fall cases","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/constructive-notice-in-slip-and-fall-cases\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Supreme Court of Texas Reaffirms Strict Constructive\u2011Notice Standard in Slip\u2011and\u2011Fall Cases - Advise & Consult, Inc.","og_description":"Supreme Court of Texas has reaffirmed the evidentiary burden plaintiffs must meet to establish constructive notice in slip\u2011and\u2011fall cases","og_url":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/constructive-notice-in-slip-and-fall-cases\/","og_site_name":"Advise & Consult, Inc.","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Advise-Consult-Inc-126949043996790\/","article_published_time":"2026-04-21T21:41:43+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-04-21T21:41:47+00:00","author":"admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@adviseconsult","twitter_site":"@adviseconsult","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/constructive-notice-in-slip-and-fall-cases\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/constructive-notice-in-slip-and-fall-cases\/"},"author":{"name":"admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/0a11abe008083d5fb19c2b0feefe7bd7"},"headline":"Supreme Court of Texas Reaffirms Strict Constructive\u2011Notice Standard in Slip\u2011and\u2011Fall Cases","datePublished":"2026-04-21T21:41:43+00:00","dateModified":"2026-04-21T21:41:47+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/constructive-notice-in-slip-and-fall-cases\/"},"wordCount":959,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#organization"},"keywords":["Advise & Consult","Constructive Notice","insurance","Premisis Liability","Slip and Fall"],"articleSection":["Insurance"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/constructive-notice-in-slip-and-fall-cases\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/constructive-notice-in-slip-and-fall-cases\/","url":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/constructive-notice-in-slip-and-fall-cases\/","name":"Supreme Court of Texas Reaffirms Strict Constructive\u2011Notice Standard in Slip\u2011and\u2011Fall Cases - Advise & Consult, Inc.","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-04-21T21:41:43+00:00","dateModified":"2026-04-21T21:41:47+00:00","description":"Supreme Court of Texas has reaffirmed the evidentiary burden plaintiffs must meet to establish constructive notice in slip\u2011and\u2011fall cases","inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/constructive-notice-in-slip-and-fall-cases\/"]}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/","name":"Advise & Consult, Inc.","description":"Construction Expert Witnesses","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#organization","name":"Advise & Consult","url":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/AC-Red-Logo.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/AC-Red-Logo.png","width":162,"height":75,"caption":"Advise & Consult"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Advise-Consult-Inc-126949043996790\/","https:\/\/x.com\/adviseconsult","https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company-beta\/204526\/","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/user\/MrConstructionExpert"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/0a11abe008083d5fb19c2b0feefe7bd7","name":"admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/b01e71b7acadd7657af782b7ad1a30cc?s=96&d=mm&r=pg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/b01e71b7acadd7657af782b7ad1a30cc?s=96&d=mm&r=pg","caption":"admin"},"sameAs":["http:\/\/www.expertwitnessinconstruction.com"]}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p2ztG6-3NA8","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/905580","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=905580"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/905580\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":905581,"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/905580\/revisions\/905581"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=905580"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=905580"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.myconstructionexpert.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=905580"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}