Court Evaluates AI-Related Provisions in Discovery Protective Orders

Kathryn C. Cole | GreenbergTraurig As generative AI becomes more common in litigation workflows, courts are increasingly being asked to address how AI tools may be used with confidential discovery materials. A recent decision from the District of Colorado provides insights into one court’s approach to generative AI in discovery. The ruling distinguishes between public… Continue reading Court Evaluates AI-Related Provisions in Discovery Protective Orders

California Becomes First State to Legislate Lawyers’ Use of AI

Esquire Deposition Solutions On Sept. 30, California Gov. Gavin Newsom signed into law a measure regulating lawyers’ use of artificial intelligence in their work. The first-in-the-nation legislation, SB 574, requires lawyers to: SB 574 also amends the California Code of Civil Procedure’s requirements on lawyer signatures on pleadings and other documents filed with the courts.… Continue reading California Becomes First State to Legislate Lawyers’ Use of AI

When Agencies Play Ostrich: A Fee-Recovery Playbook for Any Government Contractor or Grant Recipient

Aron C. Beezley and Nathaniel J. Greeson | GovCon Source A federal judge in Massachusetts recently ordered the Department of Defense (DoD) to pay $450,447 in attorneys’ fees to the Association of American Universities (AAU), after finding that DoD’s now-defunct “Rate Cap Policy” was not just unlawful, but never substantially justified in the first place.… Continue reading When Agencies Play Ostrich: A Fee-Recovery Playbook for Any Government Contractor or Grant Recipient

Protecting Litigation Skill In The Age Of AI

Rebecca Torrey | IR Global How is AI changing the skills expected of professionals in your jurisdiction? Presently, the availability of AI tools has not changed the skills expected of litigation attorneys in California. Some attorneys may be using AI for drafting and editing to improve their writing abilities. Others may use it in research… Continue reading Protecting Litigation Skill In The Age Of AI

Artificial Intelligence Used Incorrectly Leads to Attorney Sanctions

Advise & Consult, Inc. In Capital Standard, LLC v. U.S. Bank National Association (Fla. 2d DCA Aug. 21, 2026), the Florida Second District Court of Appeal sanctioned an attorney with over 40 years of legal experience following the submission of briefs containing 46 hallucinated legal authorities (31 in the amended initial brief and 15 in… Continue reading Artificial Intelligence Used Incorrectly Leads to Attorney Sanctions