Aron C. Beezley and Nathaniel J. Greeson | BuildSmart
Government contractors often focus on federal procurement opportunities, which are governed by the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) regime. However, the state-level procurement landscape presents a distinct — and often less uniform — set of rules, risks, and opportunities. For businesses expanding into state or local markets, understanding these structural and procedural differences is essential.
No Uniform Regulatory Framework
Unlike the federal government, which operates under the FAR and agency-specific supplements (such as the DFARS or NASA FAR Supplement), each state maintains its own procurement statutes, administrative codes, and policies.
- State-specific rules – Every state has unique procurement laws — such as California’s Public Contract Code, Florida’s Chapter 287, or Texas’s Government Code, Title 10.
- Local autonomy – Counties, cities, and school districts may impose additional rules, meaning contractors must navigate not just one framework, but potentially dozens within a single state.
Decentralized Oversight and Variation in Procedures
Federal procurement is largely centralized through agencies with well-defined acquisition structures and oversight by entities such as the Government Accountability Office (GAO) or the Court of Federal Claims. By contrast, state procurement is decentralized, with varied and differing oversight bodies, review processes, and appeal rights.
- Procurement authority – Some states rely on a central purchasing office; others delegate authority to individual agencies.
- Bidding thresholds – The dollar value that triggers formal competition or public solicitation requirements varies widely.
- Dispute resolution – Whereas federal contractors can file bid protests at the GAO or COFC, state-level protests may be handled internally by the procuring agency, an administrative hearing office, or a state court — each with unique timelines and procedures.
Distinct Socioeconomic and Local Preferences
While federal procurement promotes small business participation through programs administered by the Small Business Administration (SBA), state procurements often include preferences for local or regional businesses.
- Local vendor preferences – Many states apply in-state bidder preferences, tie-breaking advantages, or reciprocal preference laws.
- Diversity and inclusion goals – States frequently impose supplier diversity requirements that differ from SBA standards, such as targeted participation goals for minority-, women-, or veteran-owned businesses certified at the state level.
- Reciprocity issues – A business recognized as a small or disadvantaged business by the SBA — or another state — may need to obtain separate certification under state-specific programs.
Contract Terms and Risk Allocation
Generally, federal contracts follow standard clauses prescribed by the FAR, ensuring predictability and a well-developed body of precedent interpreting those clauses. State contracts, however, often vary significantly:
- Standard terms – Many states use their own “general conditions” that may differ from FAR terms, particularly regarding termination rights, indemnification, and dispute resolution.
- Negotiation flexibility – Smaller procurements or professional services contracts at the state level may allow for more negotiation than their federal counterparts — but may also include terms that increase contractor risk, such as broader indemnification or fewer rights to equitable adjustments.
- Sovereign immunity – Contractors should also be aware that sovereign immunity issues are often governed by state constitutions and statutes, which can limit recovery in disputes.
Transparency and Public Record Obligations
Both federal and state governments generally emphasize transparency, but state-level public records laws — which are often broader than the federal Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) — can expose more contractor data to disclosure. As such, contractors should take care to properly mark proprietary information and understand the applicable state’s public disclosure exemptions before submitting proposals or invoices.
Bid Protests and Remedies
Bid protest rights and remedies differ substantially:
- Federal level – The GAO and the Court of Federal Claims provide well-established protest venues with fairly consistent case law and defined timelines.
- State level – Some states provide an internal protest procedure; others require direct filing in state court. Deadlines can be as short as a few days, and remedies may vary depending on the state.
Conclusion
While federal procurement generally offers uniformity and predictability, state-level contracting requires agility and state-specific expertise. Each jurisdiction presents its own set of statutes, procedures, and preferences that can materially affect a contractor’s eligibility, pricing, compliance obligations, and protest rights.
Contractors seeking to expand into state markets should invest time in understanding each state’s procurement code, developing relationships with local agencies, and ensuring compliance with diverse registration and certification requirements. With proper preparation, the state procurement arena can offer substantial growth opportunities — especially for companies already accustomed to the discipline of federal contracting.
When one of your cases is in need of a construction expert, estimates, insurance appraisal or umpire services in defect or insurance disputes – please call Advise & Consult, Inc. at 888.684.8305, or email experts@adviseandconsult.net.
Republished with permission. The article, “Understanding State-Level Procurement: Key Differences from the Federal System” was originally published on BuildSmart by Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP. Copyright 2025.