Tag: duty to defend

In Washington, an Insurer Cannot Refuse to Defend, Change Its Mind, and Still Expect to Control the Defense or Avoid Bad Faith

Kevin Mapes | The Policyholder Report | February 20, 2018 A recent decision from the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington again demonstrates the decidedly pro-policyholder nature of insurance-coverage law in the state of Washington. Like so many coverage cases, 2FL Enterprises, LLC v. Houston Specialty Insurance Co., arose from underlying construction-defect litigation.… Continue reading In Washington, an Insurer Cannot Refuse to Defend, Change Its Mind, and Still Expect to Control the Defense or Avoid Bad Faith

An Insurer’s Duty to Defend is Now Triggered by Pre-Suit Notices Under Florida’s Construction Defect Statute, But Only With an Insurer’s Consent

Gary Brown and Steven Appelbaum | Construction Industry Counselor | January 5, 2018 In a case of first impression that will undoubtedly have significant effects on Florida’s construction and insurance industries, the Florida Supreme Court recently decided that an insurer’s duty to defend under a standard form commercial general liability (CGL) policy was triggered by… Continue reading An Insurer’s Duty to Defend is Now Triggered by Pre-Suit Notices Under Florida’s Construction Defect Statute, But Only With an Insurer’s Consent

Florida Supreme Court Ruling to Have Big Impact on Duty to Defend Construction Cases

Elizabeth B. Ferguson | Insurance Journal | January 4, 2018 A recent case out of the Florida Supreme Court will likely have a big impact on the duty of insurers to defend Florida construction cases. The case, Altman Contractors, Inc. v. Crum & Forster Specialty Insurance Company arises out of a declaratory judgment action filed in the… Continue reading Florida Supreme Court Ruling to Have Big Impact on Duty to Defend Construction Cases

Federal Court Reaffirms That There is No Duty to Defend or Indemnify a Builder for Defective Construction Work

David M. McLain | Colorado Construction Litigation | December 18, 2017 Association Insurance Company v. Carbondale Glen Lot E-8, LLC In a case that squarely confronts the juxtaposition of an insurer’s duty to defend or indemnify its insured for construction related defects, the United States District Court for the District of Colorado recently granted an… Continue reading Federal Court Reaffirms That There is No Duty to Defend or Indemnify a Builder for Defective Construction Work

Oregon Supreme Court Confirms Broad Duty to Defend

Theresa A. Guertin and Tiffany Casanova | Saxe Doernberger & Vita PC The Supreme Court of Oregon issued a decision at the end of last year which perfectly illustrates the lengths to which a court may go to grant a contractor’s claim for defense from its insurer in a construction defect suit. In West Hills… Continue reading Oregon Supreme Court Confirms Broad Duty to Defend