Mark Chediak | Claims Journal Xcel Energy Inc. acknowledged that its equipment was likely involved in igniting the worst wildfire in Texas history. But the utility company refuted allegations it had acted negligently. “Based on currently available information, Xcel Energy acknowledges that its facilities appear to have been involved in an ignition of the Smokehouse… Continue reading Xcel Says Its Equipment Likely Involved in Huge Texas Blaze
Tag: insurance coverage
To OCIP or Not to OCIP, That Is the Question – Pros and Cons of Wrap-Up Construction Insurance
Michael Jefferson | Davis Wright Tremaine Developers and owners often find that obtaining insurance coverage for their construction projects can be confusing and unnecessarily complicated. When dealing with construction projects in excess of $50 million, an Owner Controlled Insurance Program (“OCIP”) (also known as Wrap-Up or consolidated insurance) may be an option for owners to… Continue reading To OCIP or Not to OCIP, That Is the Question – Pros and Cons of Wrap-Up Construction Insurance
Court Finds No Coverage for Loss Caused by Water Back Up Through a Storm Drain
Tiffany Bustamante O’Quinn | Property Insurance Law Observer In Carrico v. Stillwater Ins. Co., 23-CV-349-RAJ, 2024 WL 308106 (W.D. Wash. Jan. 26, 2024), the Western District of Washington considered competing motions for partial summary judgment in a property damage case involving a winter storm, where large amounts of rain and melted snow backed the drain up… Continue reading Court Finds No Coverage for Loss Caused by Water Back Up Through a Storm Drain
LEG 3 – Has America sneezed?
Jonathan Bruce | HFW We have recently seen a further eyebrow raising decision on LEG 3 (a defects exclusion/write back) under a Construction All Risks (“CAR”) policy coming out of the US, the second in only three months. These will attract some attention for insurance market participants in other jurisdictions because of the dearth of… Continue reading LEG 3 – Has America sneezed?
Court Finds Policy Term, “Windstorm,” to be Ambiguous in Coverage Dispute Involving Tornado
Paul Ferland and Joshua Tumen | Property Insurance Law Observer In Mankoff v. Privilege Underwriters Reciprocal Exchange (2024 WL 322297 (Tex. App.—Dallas Jan. 29, 2024)), the Court determined that the term “windstorm” was ambiguous as utilized in the subject insurance policy. The insureds suffered property damage caused by a tornado and subsequently submitted a claim to their… Continue reading Court Finds Policy Term, “Windstorm,” to be Ambiguous in Coverage Dispute Involving Tornado