Robert M. Frey | Butler Snow | January 30, 2018 An Illinois General Contractor learned a hard lesson the other day; the case is Vivify Constr., LLC v. Nautilus Ins. Co., 2017 IL App (1st) 170192. The General Contractor, Vivify Construction, subcontracted part of the job to Victoria. Naturally wishing to protect itself from claims arising… Continue reading “Additional Insured” Counseled to Read the Policy
Tag: insurance coverage
Certified Copy of the Policy…To the Best of Our Knowledge
Christina Phillips | Property Insurance Coverage Law Blog | February 3, 2018 TO THE BEST OF OUR KNOWLEDGE. . . When determining if there is coverage for a claim, the first document attorneys, homeowners, and adjusters will look at is the policy. We often instruct adjusters or homeowners to request a certified copy of the… Continue reading Certified Copy of the Policy…To the Best of Our Knowledge
Not Every Refusal to Provide Coverage Equals Bad Faith
Cheryl D. Shoun | Nexsen Pruet | January 30, 2018 A complicated and interesting factual history, along with a number of actions, including an earlier one for declaratory judgment, resulted in a thoughtful and reasoned opinion of the United States District Court for South Carolina. Agape Senior Primary Care, Inc. v. Evanston Insurance Company 2018 WL 490386… Continue reading Not Every Refusal to Provide Coverage Equals Bad Faith
Louisiana Appellate Court Affirms Summary Judgment For Insurer Where Damage Manifested After Policy Period
Phelps Dunbar LLP | January 30, 2018 A Louisiana court of appeal affirmed a grant of summary judgment in favor of an insurer where the alleged damage did not manifest during the policy periods. Crosstex Energy Servs., LP v. Texas Brine Co., LLC, 2017-0863 (La. App. 1 Cir. 12/21/17). The insured, operator of an underground salt… Continue reading Louisiana Appellate Court Affirms Summary Judgment For Insurer Where Damage Manifested After Policy Period
No Coverage for Building’s First Collapse, But Disputed Facts on Second Collapse
Tred R. Eyerly | Insurance Law Hawaii | January 3, 2018 While building’s first collapse was not covered, there were disputed facts regarding the second collapse, leading to a reversal of the order granting summary judgment to the insurer on both collapses. Intergroup Int’l Ltd. v. Cincinnati Ins. Cos, 2017 Ohio app. LEXIS 5099 (Ohio Ct.… Continue reading No Coverage for Building’s First Collapse, But Disputed Facts on Second Collapse