Scott Paton | Hodgson Russ Construction Alert Although “construction” was originally deemed by Governor Cuomo to be “essential”, and thus exempt from the restrictions imposed by his March 18, 2020 Executive Order, that has since changed. Through subsequent Executive Orders, as interpreted by various State agencies, the reach of COVID-19 has extended deeply into the… Continue reading No-Damages-for-Delay Clauses and the COVID-19 Crisis
Tag: No Damages For Delays
Does a No-Damage-for-Delay Clause Also Preclude Acceleration Damages?
Christine Fan and Ted Gropman | Pepper Hamilton Construction contracts often include a “no damage for delay” clause that denies a contractor the right to recover delay-related costs and limits the contractor’s remedy to an extension of time for noncontractor-caused delays to a project’s completion date. Depending on the nature of the delay and the… Continue reading Does a No-Damage-for-Delay Clause Also Preclude Acceleration Damages?
Damages For Delay-An Update
Henry L. Goldberg | Moritt Hock & Hamroff | February 12, 2019 One of the most significant developments in construction law of late concerns an issue I have been actively involved in for some time. It is a coordinated, industrywide effort to eliminate “no damages for delay” clauses for public construction. As with the federal… Continue reading Damages For Delay-An Update
Slow As A Turtle? “No Damages For Delay” Clause Inapplicable To Contractor’s Claim Against Architect
Matthew DeVries | Best Practices Construction Law | September 5, 2018 On Saturday, I took the kids to the zoo for a day-long adventure. Faith’s favorite attraction was the turtle compound that was filled with about 20 slowpokes walking a circle. Like watching paint dry, we sat on the sidelines as these mini-dinosaurs trekked the… Continue reading Slow As A Turtle? “No Damages For Delay” Clause Inapplicable To Contractor’s Claim Against Architect
No Damages for Delay Clause? How About Damages for a Cardinal Change? Steel Erector Claims its 301 Day Delay Constitutes an Abandonment of the Subcontract and CA Fed Court Agrees.
Brendan Carter, Esq. | The Dispute Resolver | July 28, 2018 Sauer Incorporated (Sauer) entered into a design-build contract with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers for the design and construction of the Operational Readiness Training Complex at Fort Hunter Ligget, California. Sauer then executed a subcontract with Agate Steel, Inc. (Agate) for the structural steel… Continue reading No Damages for Delay Clause? How About Damages for a Cardinal Change? Steel Erector Claims its 301 Day Delay Constitutes an Abandonment of the Subcontract and CA Fed Court Agrees.