Tred R. Eyerly | Insurance Law Hawaii The federal district court determined that the insurer was not obligated to defend construction defect claims under Kentucky law. Westfield Ins. Co. v. Kentuckiana Commercial Concrete, LLC, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 222674 (W.D. Ky. Dec. 14, 2023). HRB, the owner of an apartment complex, filed… Continue reading No Duty to Defend Construction Defect Claims under Kentucky Law
Category: Construction Claims
Connecticut’s New False Claims Act Increases Risk to Public Construction Participants
Fred Hedberg and William Stoll | Construction Law Zone After several decades, Governor Ned Lamont signed a bill into law, effective July 1, 2023, An Act Concerning Liability for False and Fraudulent Claims, Public Act No. 23-129, eliminating language that previously limited enforcement of Connecticut’s False Claims Act to claims relating to a state-administered health or… Continue reading Connecticut’s New False Claims Act Increases Risk to Public Construction Participants
Breach vs. Default — What’s the difference?
John Mark Goodman | BuildSmart The words breach and default are often used interchangeably to indicate that somebody hasn’t done what they were legally required to do. According to Black’s Law Dictionary, the words do appear somewhat interchangeable. Black’s defines breach as “a violation or infraction of a law, obligation, or agreement, especially of an official duty or a legal obligation.” … Continue reading Breach vs. Default — What’s the difference?
Recovering Lost Profits in Construction Claims: What Should Project Owners Do?
Blake Robinson | Davis Wright Tremaine One common consequence when a construction goes sideways, whether because the project is delayed or defects arise, is that the owner suffers lost revenue. For example, an apartment complex owner loses out on three months of rent when a project is completed three months after the substantial completion date… Continue reading Recovering Lost Profits in Construction Claims: What Should Project Owners Do?
Res Judicata not Apply to Bar Overlapping Damages in Separate Suits Against Contractor and Subcontractor
David Adelstein | Florida Construction Legal Updates Can the doctrine of res judicata bar an owner’s claim against the general contractor after the owner also sued and obtained a satisfied judgment against the subcontractor when there are identical, overlapping damages pursued in separate lawsuits. A recent case says, not really. In Pickell v. Lennar Homes, LLC, 48 Fla.L.Weekly D2037a… Continue reading Res Judicata not Apply to Bar Overlapping Damages in Separate Suits Against Contractor and Subcontractor