No Damage for Delay? No Problem: Exceptions to the Enforceability of No Damage for Delay Clauses

Chris Broughton | ConsensusDocs Introduction: Under a no-damage-for-delay clause, the owner is not liable for any monetary damages resulting from delays on the project. In lieu of monetary recovery, the contractor’s remaining remedy is a non-compensatory time extension. These clauses are common at the contractor-subcontractor interface as well. While no-damage-for-delay clauses are enforced in most… Continue reading No Damage for Delay? No Problem: Exceptions to the Enforceability of No Damage for Delay Clauses

Today’s Contacts Enforceability Issue: No Damages for Delay or Disruption Clauses

Josh M. Leavitt – February 25, 2014 We start our series of articles on multi-state variations in the treatment of contract risk with one of the most common sources of legal disputes on construction projects: scheduling, time impacts, and disruptions. Schedule-related disputes are usually fact-intensive, often require scheduling consultants, are time consuming and — if… Continue reading Today’s Contacts Enforceability Issue: No Damages for Delay or Disruption Clauses

%d bloggers like this: