Tred R. Eyerly | Insurance Law Hawaii Reversing the judgment of the district court, the Fifth Circuit found the insurer owed a defense in a construction defect case. Siplast, Inc. v. Emplrs Mut. Cas. Co., 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 795 (5th Cir. Jan. 11, 2022). The Archdiocese of New York sued various… Continue reading Fifth Circuit Finds Duty to Defend Construction Defect Case
Tag: duty to defend
Beyond the Eight Corners: Determining Whether a Liability Insurer’s Duty to Defend Is Triggered
Andrew Gann, Etahjayne Harris and Nicholas Hill | McGuireWoods In two recent decisions, the Texas Supreme Court defined the limited parameters in which Texas courts can look beyond the “four corners” of the complaint against the policyholder and the “four corners” of the insurance policy (i.e., the “eight-corners rule”) when determining whether an insurer’s “duty… Continue reading Beyond the Eight Corners: Determining Whether a Liability Insurer’s Duty to Defend Is Triggered
Nevada Supreme Court Holds That Insureds Can Use Extrinsic Evidence to Prove Duty to Defend
Bethany L. Barrese | Saxe Doernberger & Vita The recent Nevada Supreme Court ruling in Zurich American Insurance Company v. Ironshore Specialty Insurance Company benefits insureds seeking to establish an insurer’s duty to defend. As a matter of first impression, the court clarified that insureds have the burden to prove that an exception to a policy exclusion… Continue reading Nevada Supreme Court Holds That Insureds Can Use Extrinsic Evidence to Prove Duty to Defend
Excess “Other Insurance” Provision Does Not Relieve Insurer’s Duty to Defend
Nathan Lovett | Wiley Rein The United States District Court for the Central District of California, applying California law, has held that a D&O insurer cannot rely on an excess “other insurance” provision to preclude a duty to defend. TriPacific Capital Advisors, LLC v. Fed. Ins. Co., 2021 WL 5316407 (C.D. Cal. Nov. 15, 2021). The… Continue reading Excess “Other Insurance” Provision Does Not Relieve Insurer’s Duty to Defend
Third Circuit Holds that Duty to Indemnify “Follows” Duty to Defend
Jeffrey J. Vita | Saxe Doernberger & Vita In a win for policyholders, the Third Circuit Court of Appeals recently affirmed a District Court’s 2018 ruling, which held that the duty to indemnify follows the duty to defend where a settlement precludes a determination on the facts of the case relative to liability and apportionment.… Continue reading Third Circuit Holds that Duty to Indemnify “Follows” Duty to Defend