Tred R. Eyerly | Insurance Law Hawaii The court granted, in part, the insured’s motion for summary judgment by finding that matching roof tiles were required under the policy. Bertisen v. Travelers Home and Marine Ins. Co., 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3907 (D. Colo. Jan. 8, 2024). The insureds sued Travelers for breach… Continue reading Court Finds Matching of Damaged Materials is Required by Policy
Tag: Matching Considerations
From Roof Building Codes to ‘Matching’ Limits, Some Changes Underway in Florida
William Rabb | Insurance Journal Property insurance companies and roofers in Florida don’t often see eye-to-eye. Insurers have frequently blamed unscrupulous contractors for jacking up claims, and roofing companies have sued insurance carriers, blaming them for systematically denying roof work. So it may come as a surprise to learn that the Florida Roofing and Sheetmetal… Continue reading From Roof Building Codes to ‘Matching’ Limits, Some Changes Underway in Florida
Connecticut Supreme Court Rules Matching of Materials Decided by Appraisers
Tred R. Eyerly | Insurance Law Hawaii The Connecticut Supreme Court determined that an appraisal panel could resolve whether the insurer must replace undamaged materials so that they match the damaged materials. Klass v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co., 2022 Conn. LEXIS 2 (Conn. Jan. 11, 2022). The insured reported damage to the… Continue reading Connecticut Supreme Court Rules Matching of Materials Decided by Appraisers
Matching Considerations in Utah
Jonathan Bukowski | Property Insurance Coverage Law Blog | November 26, 2019 The National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) drafted a model law named the “Unfair Claims Settlement Practices Act.” These standards include fair and rapid settlement of claims as well as the procedures and practices constituting unfair claim adjustment practices. Section 9 of the… Continue reading Matching Considerations in Utah