Kentucky Supreme Court Holds “Pay-if-Paid” Provision in Subcontract Is Valid and Enforceable, Shifting Risk to Subcontractor

Michelle Beth Rosenberg | Pepper Hamilton LLP | January 25, 2018 Superior Steel, Inv. v. Ascent at Roebling’s Bridge, LLC, 2017 Ky. LEXIS 511 (December 14, 2017) Corporex Development and Construction Management, LLC (“Corporex”), a design builder, contracted with Dugan & Meyers Construction Company (“D&M”), a construction manager and general contractor on the Ascent at… Continue reading Kentucky Supreme Court Holds “Pay-if-Paid” Provision in Subcontract Is Valid and Enforceable, Shifting Risk to Subcontractor

Risky (Shifting) Business: Pay-if-Paid Provision Enforced to Subcontractor’s Detriment

Katherine e. Kohm | The Dispute Resolver | January 20, 2018 In Baker Concrete Const., Inc. v. A. Pappajohn Co., No. FSTCV166028187S, 2017 WL 4106383, at *1 (Conn. Super. Ct. 2017), at issue was the age-old dispute of non-payment for work performed. The Baker Court first recounted the direct avenues for collecting on a construction project when payment is not… Continue reading Risky (Shifting) Business: Pay-if-Paid Provision Enforced to Subcontractor’s Detriment

%d bloggers like this: