In Utah, Asbestos Take-Home Exposure Equates to Damages Exposure For Premises Operators and Contractors

Mark Morris and Tyson Prisbrey | Snell & Wilmer In its decision Larry Boynton v. Kennecott Utah Copper, LLC, 2021 UT 40, the Utah Supreme Court found that premises operators owed a duty of care to prevent take-home exposure to asbestos dust not only its employees, but also to independent contractors on the premises. The Court… Continue reading In Utah, Asbestos Take-Home Exposure Equates to Damages Exposure For Premises Operators and Contractors

Utah Expands Premise-Owner Liability To Take-Home Asbestos Plaintiffs

Jackson Otto | Husch Blackwell Utah’s Supreme Court recently issued an opinion which dramatically expands premise owners’ liability for asbestos-related injuries. On August 5, 2021, the Court reversed Utah’s Court of Appeals and held that a lawsuit could proceed against two premises owners on the theory that asbestos dust from their facilities was brought home… Continue reading Utah Expands Premise-Owner Liability To Take-Home Asbestos Plaintiffs

New York Appellate Court Addresses “Trigger of Coverage” for Asbestos Claims and Other Coverage Issues

Paul A. Briganti | Complex Insurance Coverage Reporter On October 9, 2020, the New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, decided an appeal from a trial court’s 2018 summary judgment ruling on a number of coverage issues arising out of asbestos-related bodily injury claims against plaintiffs Carrier Corporation (Carrier) and Elliott Company (Elliott). See Carrier Corp. v.… Continue reading New York Appellate Court Addresses “Trigger of Coverage” for Asbestos Claims and Other Coverage Issues

A Win for Policyholders: California Court of Appeals Applies Vertical Exhaustion for Continuous Injury Claims

Celia B. Waters | Saxe Doernberger & Vita Fresh off the heels of the California Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Montrose Chemical Corp. v. Super. Ct. of L.A. Cty. (“Montrose III”),1 policyholders scored another victory as another California court rejected horizontal exhaustion in the context of continuous injury cases. The Court of Appeal of the State of… Continue reading A Win for Policyholders: California Court of Appeals Applies Vertical Exhaustion for Continuous Injury Claims

Choice of Laws Test Mandates Application of California’s Continuous and Progressive Trigger of Coverage to Asbestos Claims

Christopher Kendrick and Valerie A. Moore | Haight Brown & Bonesteel In Textron v. Travelers Casualty and Surety Co. (No. B262933, filed 2/25/20), a California appeals court held that the Restatement’s choice of laws factors mandated application of California’s continuous and progressive trigger of coverage to asbestos claims, overcoming an argument that a manifestation trigger should apply… Continue reading Choice of Laws Test Mandates Application of California’s Continuous and Progressive Trigger of Coverage to Asbestos Claims

%d bloggers like this: