Key Takeaways
- Policyholder Input vs. Expert Assessment: Asking an insured for their observations does not create a presumption of bad faith; in fact, failing to inquire may suggest an inadequate investigation. However, policyholder input cannot serve as the sole perimeter for an environmental testing scope.
- Carrier Obligation: The legal responsibility to design a scientifically sound, comprehensive sampling plan rests with the insurer and its qualified assessment professionals—not the lay policyholder.
- Bad Faith Exposure: Restricting testing strictly to locations explicitly requested by an insured—while ignoring predictable contaminant reservoirs—exposes carriers to bad faith liabilities under statutory and common law standards.
Analysis
1. The Role of the Insured in Claim Investigations
In property insurance claims involving wildfire smoke and particulate contamination, claims adjusters frequently question whether relying on a policyholder’s requested testing locations satisfies the carrier’s duty to investigate.
An insurer is fully expected to gather factual input from the policyholder. As primary witnesses to the event, policyholders provide critical context regarding:
- HVAC operating conditions during the event
- Open doors or window locations
- Visual ash distribution and odor intensity
- Prior cleaning attempts
- Occupancy factors (e.g., presence of vulnerable populations)
Gathering this factual history is an essential component of a thorough investigation. However, inquiring about a policyholder’s concerns is distinct from delegating the technical design of the investigation to them.
2. Technical Scope and Professional Standards
The average homeowner lacks technical knowledge regarding pressure differentials, heavy metal settling patterns, HVAC particulate redistribution, or statistical sampling methodologies (e.g., judgmental vs. representative sampling, detection limits, and background controls).
Industry standards—including the Technical Guide for Wildfire Restoration—explicitly distinguish between policyholder input and professional assessment:
- Policyholder interests and observations inform where potential impacts occurred.
- Certified Industrial Hygienists (CIHs) and environmental assessment professionals must exercise independent judgment to design a scientifically defensible sampling plan.
- Decisions regarding sampling types, locations, and methodology must be made in consultation with qualified professionals.
Similarly, regulatory bodies—such as the California Department of Insurance—emphasize that smoke damage claims must be fully and fairly investigated without shifting substantial technical or financial burdens onto the insured.
3. Legal Implications: Bad Faith and Totality of Circumstances
Under governing case law (e.g., Egan v. Mutual of Omaha Ins. Co. and Wilson v. 21st Century Ins. Co.), an insurer is obligated to fully inquire into all potential grounds supporting a claim. A carrier cannot focus exclusively on evidence supporting a denial or rely on an artificial boundary to avoid discovering covered damage.
The Adjuster’s Trap:
If an adjuster asks an insured, “Where do you want us to test?” and subsequently limits sampling strictly to those specified rooms—omitting attic spaces, HVAC ductwork, wall cavities, or crawlspaces—the insurer cannot defend the scope merely because it matched the layperson’s list.
While an insurer may scrutinize an insured’s requests, reject scientifically unsupported testing, or retain experts to establish background contamination levels, the overall investigation must be reasonably designed to uncover the true extent of the damage.
Guidance for Claims Handling
- Inquire Thoroughly: Frame questions around factual observations rather than technical scope (e.g., “Where did you observe ash or odor?” rather than “What rooms do you want tested?”).
- Consult Experts Early: Provide the policyholder’s factual history to a qualified environmental professional to establish an independent, property-specific testing scope.
- Avoid De Facto Waivers: Never treat a policyholder’s failure to identify a concealed contaminant reservoir as a waiver of coverage or testing.
- Maintain Standards: Ensure investigations comply with written company guidelines and regulatory requirements for prompt, complete, and fair claims resolution.
Written with the assistance of artificial intelligence.
When one of your cases is in need of a construction expert, estimates, insurance appraisal or umpire services in defect or insurance disputes – please call Advise & Consult, Inc. at 801.641.8304, or email experts@adviseandconsult.net.